Thought I would ask the group -- when I was last in the analog game some 12-15 years ago it was a VPI or Nitty Gritty for record cleaning (that and the wood-handled Discwasher pad with red-bottle liquid, Zerostat and Decca CF brush for just before playing an LP)... are these still the go-to standard units, or has the state of the art / ’value’ options advanced to some other kits in the present? I see cleaner units now from Pro-ject, Music Hall, Spin Clean, etc etc.
In my case I am not trying to ’deep clean’ mistreated, flea market or recycled recors store records... just good hygiene maintenance-cleaning of a treasured collection - 80% regular records, 20% ’audiophile’ pressings.
Bradf was considerate enough to email me links to information about the "budget-priced" CleanerVinyl version of an osmosis cleaner. At around $700 for the 12-LP version, I do believe I'm gonna get me one!
I've found that all of the hype over protecting the label is just that, hype. Early on in my record cleaning education, before the 16.5 and the AD and the steamer, I use to actually dip my lps into a sink full of distilled water to rinse. I never had one issue with the labels. (Of coarse you don't let them soak.) On older lps where the labels have aged, if they get wet, just blot them off, don't rub. Having said this, if I see my cleaning fluid seep onto a label, I'll blot it off.
While I'm steaming, during the time when the steamer is recharging, I'll blot off the label when necessary. As I mentioned earlier, I hold a record over a sink against my torso while steaming. This allows everything to drain off as much as possible.
Thank you for the tip. I found a half dozen steamers on Amazon. Guess I'll pick one and have at it. Not expensive. Might add to the labor but I will take your judgement on this!
If you can find the dbtech with the larger tank, go for it. That one is a no-brainer.
Are you familiar with the Gem Dandy cleaning system? I've often thought about making my own (simple pvc stand w/ basic tools) but taller to set in my sink. After spreading the fluid on a lp, attach it to this and voila'! I will do it at some point.
ebm,
Yes, I've even used mine to clean out the mold that accumulates inside of an in-door ice maker. Lots of uses.
...the dbtech has much better ergonomics (compared to my Mapleshade) which makes for better contol. It has a very good steam pattern as well. These two things make a difference!
a friend of mine bought a HAAN after watching me using my Mapleshade years ago. I went to his house one day just to test it out. I was disappointed in that unit. Much lower steam pressure, lesser steam pattern..
Same here, other machine: Moth RCM/II. 10 years´ faultless service, deep cleaned over a thousand albums. Price app. 500 euros. Noisy but does the job. Highly recommended.
Maybe what I've failed in getting across is, with steaming, in good lighting...the water/light allows you to actually see anything left on the lp.
I've cleaned lps through my AD/16,5 time and again, still, there are just some times where steaming is THE only way to get an lp clean.
Ex: I was just listening to my Outlaws lps, I pulled the "Live" record out. I had marked previously.."re-steam?". Mind you, this was way before I had my 16.5/AD cleaners.
I was re-steaming under my under-cabinet led light and can see the little "flakes" on the lp that are stubborn, but will come off when you apply first, common sense, then a more aggressive application. These are the types of things that will not come off just through any automated process.
This is why I believe that being able to actually see what's going on while cleaning is essential ti The Best process.
On another topic that I had started, I made clear yesterday of this fact.
Right now, all I can do is apologize for things (out of my control).
I shut my computer down yesterday and ran all of my Norton system controls in order to do what I could on my end.
I don't know what else I can do on my end.
FWIW: Looking at our conversations now, I see the (extra, overlay (content) that I advised the Audiogon people two weeks ago. There has been some kind of intrusion regarding my posts here.
Very well, I see your situation now. I just got the impression from your previous post that disgusts me. Whatever/by whoever it was meant to be I do not like calling names.
I come from a very different culture, some things are much insulting than in your culture I´d assume.
I haven´t read all this thread and I have no idea what the heck is going on here since that two weeks.
Someone/thing intruders your posts ? That´s another story. Truly annoying. Contact customer help, they will do their best I strongly believe. I have been mistreated too. Someone spread misinformation of my activities. Very tiresome.
I will delete my posts here soon ´cos I suddenly lost all interest to this particular thread.
slaw, I've not read this post for awhile, so going back a month to your comment I'll add this.
While my VPI was set properly as delivered, a friend received one which was not. He is not a person with much patience so I offered to help. Contacting VPI I was told (by Mike, though this was several years ago) about the 185 degree setting for the suction tube. Thinking it through that makes perfect sense, but I agree it should have been in the manual.
I agree that ultrasound is the best method, by far. I had a VPI machine, and tested those results against an Elmasonic US machine running at 80 KHz. No contest. The Elmasonic was far superior.
To spin the records I use a spinner from Vinyl Stack: the Ultrasonic Spin Kit. The spacers also protect the labels.
It's a good combination - they both work well, they both look good, and they both have a fine fit and finish. The Elmasonic is German, and looks it; the Vinyl Stack looks German but is domestic. Good companies, good products. Highly recommended.
Terry, It seems the Vinyl Stack Kit is reasonably priced but does it include a tank and if so what are the exact dimensions. Is a wider tank more handy in practice ? Do they provide any chemicals/solvents, or are they needed at all ? And how much time does it take to clean one record set ?
I just got the newest iteration of thePro-Ject(marketed as the MK II in the UK) and have been pleased with it. I paid $499, and the dealer threw in a dust cover. I still use my Spin Cleaner for the really dirtyrecords first...don’t want to stress the new baby yet 🙂. I am still experimenting with mycleaningprocess.
The company has a recommendedcleaningprocess of adding drops of their (diluted)cleaningliquid, turn on themachinerotation, use the goat-hair brush to spread the liquid, reverse the rotation and use the brush again, then vacuum two rotations and reverse for two more rotations.
My dealer recommended another process that he uses for hisrecordcleaningservice: he uses a Spin Cleaner for the initialcleaningof very dirtyrecords, then attaches therecordand cover, adds liquid, then gently scrubs with a Mobile Fidelitycleaningbrush. He then vacuums themachinein one direction.
I have seen a marked improvement in the sound quality, and mycleaningand drying time is halved. Love the fact the RCM has no platter. I have had only two minor problems: the aluminum arm rests on a plastic collar and is so tight I could not manipulate it; a little engine grease fixed that. Also, the vacuum arm when fully swung over touches therecordlock and causes aluminum shavings to fall on therecord. Slightly adjusting the vacuum arm avoids this. The factory-provided liquid seems to work well
Hi, I'm considering a VPI 16.5 ($800) versus a Pro-Ject VC-e ($499) or VC-S2 ($699). The VCI does not have a reverse button; The VC-E apparently has a hole on the base below the record which is sucked up when spinning the records so the bottom side of the record gets dirty while being cleaned. I heard they have a plate to cover this that they are including in newer models.
I'd appreciate any recommendations, i.e. which brand and model would you recommend and is the reverse feature that important in cleaning albums?
I used the VPI 16.5 with a three step process (enzyme, cleaner, ultra pure water rinse) for 15 years. This was when used albums joined my collection and employed a one step for new pressings. Once that was complete rarely was it revisited. The machine was reliable and a solid performer, though it is a little loud so I used ear plugs. I have since moved to ultrasonic cleaning and sold the VPI to another who is continuing to achieve good results with its use.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.