kr4
Responses from kr4
| DSPeaker Anti Mode 2.0 evaluation Ozzy, DSpeaker says the time delay to process is equal to about 3 feet of sound travel, so placing your subs 3 feet closer to you than your main speakers will cancel that problem. They also state that it is very minimal and not to worry about that... | |
| Deciding between Yamaha or Marantz I have not had problems with the room correction in either the Marantz or the Yamaha and, yes, the Yamaha will handle two independant subs. | |
| Deciding between Yamaha or Marantz All sauce, no meat. | |
| Deciding between Yamaha or Marantz So, Bol972, if you will not tell everyone "how I do it," your recommendations are not useful since no one else can do it your way. Also, how does your measurements "at totally different places and hights" not apply equally to XT32 as you say they ... | |
| Optimal vertical position of bass traps in corner? Yes, it does. Placing it in a tricorner (intersection of three boundaries) will allow it to interact maximally with all three major room modes (L,W,H). This means that placing it in the corner at the floor or at the ceiling is more effective than ... | |
| Remote volume control = unacceptable compromise? Another exception is Ayre. | |
| DSPeaker Anti Mode 2.0 evaluation DSP processor or a proper crossover. | |
| New DSD DAC. Recommendations please The exaSound DACs will play up to 4xDSD as well as DXD. Also, the e28 will handle up to 8 channels. Some more comments here: http://forum.stereophile.com/content/music-round-63-page-2 | |
| DSPeaker Anti Mode 2.0 evaluation 1. Overlap has nothing to do with time delay; it is the inevitable concomitant of using a sub with main speakers.2. Calibrating the sub with AM 2.0 is what inserts the delay in the sub because the processing takes time. It cannot reduce/change it.... | |
| DSPeaker Anti Mode 2.0 evaluation I have no doubt that both outputs are OK. However, the sub output will be delayed by about 10-20msecs which represents a phase shift between the subs and the main speakers. In the frequency range where they overlap, the phase shift might be a prob... | |
| DSPeaker Anti Mode 2.0 evaluation Ozzy-I have never used the QOL but I should point out that, hooked up as you have it, the AM 2.0 will introduce a latency (delay)into the subs and that is likely to screw up some of the vaunted phase corrections of the QOL. | |
| What's the deal with Microgrove LPs? I have 7" and 10" LPs and they are 33rpm. Yours are CBS/Columbia and are likely to be, as well. 45rpm was RCA's thing. | |
| DSPeaker Anti Mode 2.0 evaluation Necessary, useful, whatever. If you have a problem which needs a cure, you have to decide if the cure is worth the cost. | |
| DSPeaker Anti Mode 2.0 evaluation In theory, of course, the insertion of any unnecessary additional device, even an interconnect can only diminish the accuracy of the signal. However, the issue is whether that insertion is truly unnecessary or if the price of its insertion buys an... | |
| DSPeaker Anti Mode 2.0 evaluation Congratulations! Your setup and acoustics are perfect! :~) |