atdavid
Responses from atdavid
| How Science Got Sound Wrong Are you seriously suggesting that we cannot measure electrical signals, to very high bandwidths, and with exceptional resolution? That is definitely what you appear to be saying? Is that what you are saying?I really don't need to say much more t... | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong It is fine to say that I am wrong, it is another to prove that I am, or even show some logic to justify that I am.The initial aspects of the auditory system is a mechanical system. Heck, the transfer of sound is a mechanical system. But even if no... | |
| New Omega E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies RF and EMI absorbing sheets are quite common in industry, relatively inexpensive, and easily sourced. The technology has been around for a long time. For high frequencies, typically carbon black, graphene, etc. embedded in a polymer, for lower fre... | |
| Best home remedy for paper cone woofers cleaning the dust off? Air duster. | |
| Does the 'Buck' Start with the DAC? If the DAC is well designed, has good analog layout, is isolated as necessary, etc. then the streamer should not matter at all. | |
| new GAN amplifier georgehifi,Considering most tube amplifiers with transformers, which many audiophiles love, and use regularly even with hard to drive speakers, have a damping factor <=20, your overall argument at least w.r.t. listening enjoyment is questionabl... | |
| New Omega E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies If the manufacturer asked you to, and you did it, then yes, that would be an advertisement. jafreeman OP506 posts11-21-2019 2:06pmIn my opening statement, I said a few of us who have these new mats were asked to introduce them, not because we work... | |
| New Omega E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies Perhaps you can explain how applying a "mat" to a sealed metal enclosure would significantly change the EMI, when the metal enclosure would already do that? Since the mat has metal on it, it would stick to a steel enclosure which would also have ... | |
| Do speaker cables need a burn in period? That's almost as good as this video with all the cables in the wrong direction:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4mHPeMGTJM | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong And I could bring forth many musicians who would tell you that digital recordings are more truthful to the sounds they are creating, even though "analog", with its limitations may have lovely euphonics. Who is right, them or you?I could also bring... | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong Cool, I also participate on DIYAudio and AudioScience, and you know what, there are many many people on both those forums who would never make the mistakes that the author of this article and you have made.I provided several links in this forum th... | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong The author came up with an explanation that was wrong by trying to assert expertise in an area he does not have. In many ways that is worse than creating no explanation at all, because it deflects from understanding possible real reasons ... just ... | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong Teo,You are displaying the same technical ignorance as the author of the article. Just "stating" something without understanding the underlying mathematics does not make your statement true, not even remotely, all it says is you do not understand ... | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong The author makes a claim w.r.t. timing of digitized signals, i.e. the timing limitation is the sampling rate, that is not at all accurate for a bandwidth limited signal. The author creates a problem that literally does not exist .... there is no p... | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong Timing resolution of digitized bandwidth limited signals. |