Trans Fi Salvation direct rim drive turntable


Hi A'goners, I've just bought this turntable, confident it'll be my last upgrade. The rest of my system is a Tom Evans Groove Plus SRX phono stage, EMM Labs CDSA SE cd player, Hovland HP200 pre/Radia power amps, Zu Definitions Mk 4 loudspeakers, so a pretty good way to listen to vinyl.

Over the years, since 1995 I've progressed from a Roksan Xerxes/Artemiz/Shiraz, via a Michell Orbe/SME V/Transfiguration Orpheus, finally ending up last week with my new Trans Fi Salvation/Trans Fi T3Pro Terminator/Zu modded Denon 103.

This turntable (£2500 UK price, approx $4000-$5000 US) is the brainchild of Vic, a retired dentist, who, fed up with the shortcomings of belt drive and traditionally-pivoted tone arms, literally from the ground up devised first the Terminator air bearing linear tracking tone arm (now in T3Pro guise as on my system), and now the direct rim drive Salvation turntable, a technology in direct opposition to the hegemony of belt drive we've come to accept from the '70s.

In summary, he has developed a motor that directly rim drives an oversize platter. The magic is that vibrations are drained away from the platter and hence stylus. So minimal rumble is transmitted, the weakness of Garrards/Lencos in the past. This is mated to a substantial slate plinth which does a great job of isolating the whole rig from external vibrations.

Where this differs from direct drive is that the torque applied is high enough to counteract stylus drag, but it is strictly analogue controlled ie no digital feedback applying constant micro speed control. Speed is set correctly, torque is sufficient, and speed stability is like a rock.

This is combined with his air bearing linear tracking arm, discussed on other threads.

So technical description over, how about how it sounds? Well, years ago I always assumed the overhang in bass when playing lps on my previous belt drive/pivoted arm tts, apparent as a benign artifact, was all part of the 'romance' of vinyl, esp. when compared to the dry, clinical sound of early cd. But in 2007 I acquired the EMM cd, which had a natural analogue sound playing silver discs, but none of this bass colouration. On studying the growing reemergence of idler/direct drive, and their superiority in maintaining speed stability, I agreed that the belt speed instability might be introducing this.

Two years ago I came across Vic, and now I can report that eliminating the belt for high torque rim drive has taken this whole artifact out of the equation. Whole layers of previously masked information like rhythm guitars are now present, treble information has abundant naturalness and decay, and bass, which appears to be less in quantity compared to belt, is actually more accurate with a real start-stop quality, much more like digital, and the real thing. The other positives are more linked to the arm, including uncanny tracking across the whole record side; I'm really not exaggerating in saying that the last few grooves at the end of an lp side are as solidly reproduced as the first. Music with strong dynamic contrasts are really served well by the Salvation, and I am shocked at how good this all is after trepidation that the sound might be hyperdetailed but too assertive etc. In fact music is reproduced with a relaxed incision, and a welcoming detailed transparency.

The amazing thing is that all of this is not in anyway at the expense of the natural warmth and tonal dimensionality that still puts vinyl way ahead of any digital (imho).

The only thing, and Vic would like this to be known, is that his creation is a cottage industry, and he can only produce limited numbers to order.

I'm happy to answer qs on it, as I really want our community to know about a possible world beating product at real world prices. My tech knowledge will be limited, but no problem discussing sound quality issues.

I'm not affiliated in anyway to the product, just sold my Orbe on ebay and bought this. Regards to all
spiritofmusic
The issue with Magnetically levitated feet on a TT in my view is that if the motor is separate from the TT then it compromises the rigidity between motor pulley and platter/bearing. I have no doubt that IF one has a TT that is being subjected to vibration and feedback then it may appear to be an improvement in noise floor, however this is at the cost of speed stability. Any vibration from the floor will affect the motor and platter/bearing differently resulting in instability.

An example is my back up TT - Platine Verdier. When I removed the suspension ( which is quite lossy in standard form ), the level of belt creep and oscillation was dramatically reduced - visually around 95% plus and speed stability improved.

In an ideal world the motor and platter/bearing should be rigidly coupled. You might be better to put the TT with motor drive on a platform, and then put the whole platform on the maglev feet if you have feedback issues.

On the subject of the magnetically levitated platter, I use the ball insert on the Verdier ( I can measure the platter lifting down to less than a micron through the use of a dial gauge calliper when the bearing spindle is adjusted such that most of the platter weight is still carried by levitation ). Grounding the bearing tightens up the bass and provides better timing and coherency, and cleaner transients with less smear.

Sgunther, at £120 for the 3 mag feet, it's a no brainer. The only issue I'd be wary of is if your system tends twds over brightness/thinness, this might be exaggerated. In a more neutral or warmer sounding system, the SQ impvts are substantial.
Lewm, thanx. There's too much sensitivity on forum boards and social media generally, we can all be too protective/defensive over comments construed as criticism. Will rein the hyperbole in, but the mag feet have definitely improved what is already a giant killing package.
Dover, don't worry too much about lack of continuity using the mag feet. Any movement via the feet is microscopic, this is just a way to minimise the travel of vibrations up into the tt. I'm actually considering running the motor pod on Symposium Acoustics Rollerblocks HDSEs, which will addd ANOTHER possible layer of discontinuity. Btw, the Salvation is a direct rim drive, not belt drive, and as such may be better able to cope w/this kind of isolation/discontinuity.
Impressions of the Salvation and the VPI Rim drive
I had the VPI Rim Drive and it was a nice Turntable but no way in the same league as the Salvation in terms of detail and dynamics