Unipivot tone arms


Help me Understand how Unipivot tonearms function  what are the advantages and disadvantages?

lstringfellow

It might be cheaper/easier to build a unipivot, particularly because precision machining of the point and cup is not as critical as the machining of conventional gimbal bearings, but, some very good builders with very exacting machining make unipivot arms, and some very cheap arms are made with coventional bearings.  I don't think cost explains the choice made.  There are arms that do seem to be quite sloppy and chatter that are made with all sorts of designs. 

As to the Naim ARO, that is an interesting arm.  It may be a bit sloppy, and to my ears anyway "jangly" sounding, but I can see why some people like it for its lively character; I heard it perk up a system that sounded a bit too dark and dead sounding for my taste.

I had a Keith Monks Audio Lab (KMAL) and a JH Formula 4 arm from Australia. Both unipivots. Now I have a Mayware from England - the original that JH copied. They all sound excellent!

Some unipivot tonearms (VPI for example) are poorly designed because they are inherently unstable, thus the tracking force is in a constant state of fluctuation as the tonearm traverses the record. I suspect this is why VPI has been moving toward gimbal bearing arms in recent years.

Graham Engineering knows how to make a proper unipivot.

 

 

 

I have a VPI unipivot arm and it tracks beautifully with my Soundsmith cartridge. I have tracking force adjustment and alignment as well. 

I’ve had a Moerch UP-4 on my Scheu Premiere MKII for 20+ yrs.

Used with a couple Ortofons and Lyras…setup is currently in my A/V system (not main) but works and sounds great.

Have also heard and operated (not my own) VPI unis with ZYX and Lyras.  Work and sound just fine.