2. analog
  3. 189306-1643

AT-OC9XMLvs AT-OC9XSH

Any experience comparing these carts?  Is there really a difference in stylus shape between the two?  

I have owned a few OC9ML and was not disappointed.  

I'm looking for a new cart coming off of a Lyra Skala and don't expect quite that refinement but would like equal or improved dynamics.  Also looking for solid imaging and a good soundstage.

Arm is a Jelco TK-850L on a severely modified VPI TNT.  All Herron Audio electronics.  

bpoletti
johnss
564 posts
 

Would really suggest you consider the ART-9. Quite the nice cart. The only cart I like better is the ART-1000. 

bpoletti OP
1,528 posts
 

@johnss 

Which one and why?  

 

panzrwagn's avatar
panzrwagn
444 posts
 

You would be moving from a 5th Gen moving coil to more modest, albeit impeccably executed design. Still, I can't imagine you'd be happy with the results. A-T carts aren't really known for the two characteristics you mention - dynamics and soundstage. If the replacement cost is the issue, then I'd consider a Hana ML. In my personal experience, and in every review I've read, Hana carts are extreme overachievers, easily comparable to anything 3X-5X their price.

tablejockey
3,787 posts
 

"Still, I can't imagine you'd be happy with the results"

The OP was  previosly satisfied with the OC9.

The ART9 has extensive positive user threads here, and other forums.

Cart choice like many things audio, is just personal ear preference.

 

 

johnss
564 posts
 

@bpoletti  -

I have most of the AT carts plus quite a few others. The ART 9 is a nice pathway into the ART series. Pretty musical cart, nice soundstage. 

The ART 1000 is in another league. the dynamics, soundstage depth, instrument placement in the sound stage better every other LOMC I have tried. Its one heck of a hot rod LOMC cart.  

 

More to discover