Help and Advice Needed: Cary Audio SLP-05 Preamp RMA Disaster


First, I want to thank everyone. This forum has been one of the best sources for information about gear, and I have used it extensively for years.

 

I am in need of help and advice on how to proceed from here.

The preamp is a Cary Audio SLP-05 Ultimate w/ Kimber Kable Upgrades.

Does anyone have an issue with the volume on their SLP-05 not fully muting when the knob (not mute button) is turned to zero, and do they have significant crosstalk between the channels?

This is only with XLR in and XLR out.

In particular, I would like to hear from people with DAC's with a rated voltage of 4.5V or more on XLR. This is about every high end DAC like the Holo, Chord, Auralic, and even Cary offerings, as well as DACs from Matrix, and other entry level high-end DAC's

 

My Gear:

i9 based server running HQPlayer Embedded and Roon Core.

Sonore Optical Rendu, Holo May KTE DAC, Manley Snapper Monoblocks, 6Pi Cornerhorns.

 

The story is a bit long,

so here is a TLDR;

My SLP-05 preamp does not mute when the volume is turned to zero (mute button works fine), and has significant cross talk between channels. I can input a 1KHz test tone into the LEFT channel (not other inputs), and hear it clearly from the RIGHT channel with the volume turned to zero.

Here is an unlisted video that I sent to Cary demonstrating the problem.

Cary is claiming the issue is my gear. First, they claimed my amps have too much gain (it has less than the Cary amps), and too many watts (watts?!?), then my speakers are too sensitive (102dB). They finally fixated on my Holo May DAC having too much voltage at 5.8V on balanced (the Cary is rated at +/-3V, or 6V). They remained fixated on this even though I provided the above video using the Matrix DAC which is rated at 4.5V.

 

I measured the voltage coming out of the Matrix DAC as shown in the video at

    

pin1-pin2

pin1-pin3

pin2-pin3

Matrix DAC LEFT

1.085V

1.084V

2.170V

Matrix DAC RIGHT

1.083V

1.081V

2.164V

 

which is very close to what they claim is "standard."

Cary is being resolute in stating that they have sold thousands of these preamps, never had this problem, and my case is unique. It seems I am the only owner of a Holo May (or Chord, or Auralic, or...) and an SLP-05...

 

Advice needed:

Cary is proposing modifying the preamp as follows:

1) Relocate a capacitor that is getting charged via the ground plane near the input buffer tube, and isolate the input buffer ground.

2) Tie the floating XLR neutrals to ground at the relays (this will short the inputs when an input is not selected).

3) Add a 5:1 voltage divider across the input for XLR 1, and RCA 1 to reduce the inputs from 5V to 1V. I do not know what they propose to use for the ground reference here.

I would like some feedback on these mods. I think some of these are pretty questionable. Why tie the relays directly to ground when it might be better to tie them through a 1M resistor? Tying the XLR neutral to ground seems like an invitation for common mode distortion and might prevent the circuit from being fully differential. 

Moving the cap seems fine, but it does not address the core issue - why are we having ground plane issues in the first place?

----------------------

The story as briefly as possible

I want to be clear up front, that I never engaged in raging, yelling or name calling, I never made any demands other than "you have to make this right." I did express myself as being "very upset and angry," and in a later email, "Please understand that my trust is pretty much gone at this point."

I RMA'd my 2 week old SLP-05 because the volume would not fully mute with the volume control (mute button works fine). While they had it, I paid ($250.00 + $250.00 shipping) for the gain reduction mod.

They could not find anything wrong performed the gain reduction mod, and sent the preamp back to me.

When I powered on the preamp, it was DOA. It turned out FedEx dropped it hard enough to knock the rectifier tube loose, and break the straps holding the big power capacitor down.

I found the gain reduction had no effect that I could determine, it is too loud at 10:00, and almost impossible to adjust to a low listening level.

I found the signal still bleed through at zero volume, and I found that the left channel bled through to the right channel.

 

What ensued was a steady stream of what can only be called BS (or "nonsense" as I referred to in my emails) with the Quality Service Manager. When it became clear that not only was I being not being listened to and there was a lot of CYA going on, I called and asked for the contact info of someone in authority to monitor the situation. I was given the email of the owner, who it turned out was never told about the shipping damage. I was finally issued an RMA 3 weeks after getting my preamp back.

 

They once again could not find anything wrong.

I had to actually write out an experimental plan for them to duplicate the issue.

As far as I know, they did not test another preamp with or with out the upgrades to see if the issue is unique to my unit or not.
 

It is clear to me that Cary does not want to know if there is a problem.

I am at a near loss as to how to proceed from here, and I could really use any input you good folks could provide.

 

Thanks you,

-Josh

joshua43214

Although I am among those who feel that the quality of Cary's tech support has declined, I will also say that (to me) my Marantz SA10 does sound great through the balanced ins and outs of my SLP-05. 

You may want to look at a VAC Renaissance V preamp.  It is not 6SN7 based but it does balanced ins and outs, has a remote for volume and mute, and a home theater pass through.  You will find these same capabilities on other VAC preamps also, but a previously owned Renaissance V should be in the correct price range. Excellent customer service.  

@mulveling is absolutely correct. 6V balanced/3V RCA is getting more and more common, and for very good reason. My Holo May is not unique, the Chord Dave is 6V on XLR.

The Cary 200TS is 3V RCA and +/-3V on XLR
And no I am not confused about RMS, +/-3V is 6V total - there should be no debate about this. Their manual even recommends setting the output to max (3V) when using a preamp.

 

High output voltage on a DAC is very desirable, and it is why most companies seem to be headed that direction.

 

I don't want to paste a quote from the emails they sent me because I have no idea what the laws are about this (or whose state the laws would come from).

So, I will paraphrase:

The balanced signal enters the amp, and is summed by the input buffer. Even with the volume at zero, current passes through the tube and into the ground plane which is shared with the line stage. The reason the right channel was affected more than the left channel is because the right channel input buffer tube is next to the right channel gain stage, which causes a great deal of interaction with a coupling cap that is nearby.

This comment just raises all sorts of questions, whose answers are all "Ya, but it shouldn't."

The actual circuit in the Cary is like this: the signal passes through a relay, into the input buffer tube, to the volume, then to the gain stage and out to the power amp.

So signal should (in theory) pass through the plate of the input buffer, up a wire to the attenuator and stop if the volume is at zero. It does not interact with the ground plane until it passes through the attenuator.
The only way for signal to enter the ground plane is by some kind of coupling, in this case the signal was coupling via a capacitor.
So why is the signal not better protected? if it can couple with cap, then the cap can couple with it. In other words, if the small signal input can couple with and energize the line via a capacitor stage, then the line stage can also couple with the  small signal input.

 

Honestly, they fed me so much BS, the above paraphrase being just a small part of it, that I doubt they even found the problem. I have been under the belief from the beginning that the amp simply has a solder or flux bridge somewhere. As they kept telling me, they have "sold thousands" of these with no problem. I am sure hundreds of those are hooked up Chord or Holo DACs. I would even bet that this thread has been read by people who also have a DAC with my voltage output.
From the moment I sent my first email about it, the response was "it passed QC before be shipped it, and it is perfect." Weeks of emails, and it never seemed to get through to them that my gear is not unusual and there is probably something wrong with my unit. All they would have to do is grab another one off the burn I rack and test it.

Ask yourself, if would anyone here actually pass on to a customer the statement from a tech that "your amp has too much gain, too many watts, and your speakers are too sensitive" with regard to volume bleed through and channel cross talk?
This just screams a tech who is not able to make mistakes without serious consequences. As for the QC manager, either he is willing to feed me serious BS, or he is incompetent.

They tried one line of BS after another until they got fixated on the 6V output from my Holo May, and ignored the fact that I had to switched to using a different DAC with lower output voltage.

 

So yes, Cary has lost its healthy organizational culture and is a downward spiral. 

I’m not trying to throw gasoline on the fire, and I have very limited knowledge on hardware, but Cary’s comments on "It passed QC before they shipped it" is a big BS.

As I mentioned in one of my posts here, I had an issue that was very easily caught in QC, and apparently it didn’t.

I don’t want to get into the debate of the design of Cary product, etc., that is not my expertise. But I do feel that they really need to take a serious look at their QC/Support department, and think about customer satisfaction, if they want to continue to compete in this HiFi business.