The fundamental difference between Roon and InnuOS is in philosophy: whereas Roon believes in high powered, complex sound shaping, InnuOS pursues minimalist and purist design: low powered processors and maximum attention to suppressing RMI/EMI and ground level noise intrusion. This has direct implications on software coding: Sense is designed to minimise CPU usage whereas Roon sees CPU usage as uncritical and uses complex plug-ins such as DSP to increase user friendliness.
Has anyone used the new Innuos 2.0 Sense music app? Compared it to Roon?
Anyone know if Innuos Sense has a similar setting? I can’t seem to find it.
- ...
- 152 posts total
Very well said @antigrunge2 |
I too believe Sense to be better than Roon. The only feature which tempts me back to Roon is DSP. We all need a tone control now and then. I did ask Innuos if they plan to add such a feature, and the reply from Head of Sales was thus:
|
“Trouble with that is that the more powerful the processor the higher the noise level…” Exactly! One of the reasons why I prefer Aurender’s Conductor app over ROON. And some folks wonder why Aurender is not supporting ROON :-) |
I too switched from Roon to Sense. One possible solution to your DSP is to just add a miniDSP in your signal path between pre & amp. Yes yes I know this is an extra A/D-D/A but using the miniDSP-HD version I have been unable to hear the difference noting that I have the miniDSP due to my multi-amplified horn system that that I use the mini for both crossover and volume slope of the multiple amplified horns so that they stay matched at all volumes. |
- 152 posts total