So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again...

The target audience is audio Professionals. Higher ground than audiophiles. Audio Professionals trickle down to audiophiles.

Hmmm....really hate to put it this way but simply put that right there is pretty well proof positive you really don’t have a clue...

And for the record, I’ve played in both the audiophile and "Professional" sandboxes for several decades.

And also for the record, Genelec does make some very good speakers ( btw, that being said, they are not like a lot of the other folks in that field....even though they most likely all "met the requirements"...).

Cheers

I agree, edgewound is either completely clueless or he is simply stirring the pot. It indicates to me a complete lack of understanding regarding the fundamentals of sound and the more sublime aspects of reproduction. Pearls before swine. 

I think it will be hard for djones to come back from "met the requirements". So telling of a particular thought process that apparently is hard to shake. 

Yep...I'm clueless on why people can be so gullible when it comes to audio and signal flow.

The streamer met the requirements I was looking for. I could have assembled a cheaper alternative but I didn't want to bother with getting the AES3 board from France which is the only place I could find one. I listened to 5 different streamers I could tell no difference in sound so I bought the one I liked. It was a subjective decision. 

I admit I never tried reversing the ethernet cable or AES3 cables. Perhaps that would have clinched the deal for a more expensive streamer. 

So telling of a particular thought process that apparently is hard to shake.

It's easy for me to change my view all it takes is evidence. 

Yep...I’m clueless on why people can be so gullible when it comes to audio and signal flow.

Save for some "snake oil" products on the market the other ignorant marketing ploy is reducing audio experience to pure new upgrading electronical design who measure better fort sure.... 😁

ACOUSTIC is the fundamental fact my dear.... NOT the signals....

Any relatively good gear can convey signals in a relative acceptable way... It is easy to buy some "good" gear able to convey "signals" relatively well....

But the misinformation of most audiophiles and "objectivists" heads ESPECIALLY is about the ignorance of the  huge importance of acoustic and ESPECIALLY about psychoacoustic ... The "measuring better new highly priced design" is a DECEPTION of his own also and insisting on it, instead of pointing to acoustic importance, is an half truth worst than a lie........And reducing audio qualities to measures participate of this MARKETING general delusion...

Eat your signals....

My 500 bucks system convey very well the signals....

By the way each of my ear listen not to "signals" BUT to the first wavefront coming from my controlled room and my ears/brain recreate all aspects of sound experience with the 2 different message of my ears....All my room is a distributed set of pressure zones marked out for making easier the brain job....

I trust my ears not your "measured signals"...

If you have study electronic engineering now begin to study psychoacoustic....But beware acoustian USE their ears...You will be obliged to change your tune and stop insulting people....