Jazz listening: Is it about the music? Or is it about the sound?


The thread title says it all. I can listen to jazz recordings for hours on end but can scarcely name a dozen tunes.  My jazz collection is small but still growing.  Most recordings sound great.  On the other hand, I have a substantial rock, pop and country collection and like most of us, have a near encyclopedic knowledge of it.  Yet sound quality is all over the map to the point that many titles have become nearly unlistenable on my best system.  Which leads me back to my question: Is it the sound or the music?  Maybe it’s both. You’ve just got to have one or the other!
jdmccall56
Thanks so much for all the interesting thread contributions; very informative!  Gonna go find me some Freddie Hubbard on CD!
  • "If it’s not about the music. You don’t actually appreciate jazz. Stick to Kenny G."

I agree. Kenny G's music as presented to the public via his recordings is nothing but electronic, drenched in artificial digital reverb bunk. However, he does have talent. I saw him give a performance on the old Arcenio Hall show one night. No electronic enhancement. Just straight-ahead jazz. The man was terrific. Kinda reminded me of Sonny Stitt. Who knew??

Frank
@oregonpapa 

i rewatched the 9th episode of ken burn's jazz documentary... was reminded of clifford brown, lester young/lady day, horace silver... what a lovely show and the talent of these artists was tremendous... they shaped the jazz we listen to today