Jazz listening: Is it about the music? Or is it about the sound?


The thread title says it all. I can listen to jazz recordings for hours on end but can scarcely name a dozen tunes.  My jazz collection is small but still growing.  Most recordings sound great.  On the other hand, I have a substantial rock, pop and country collection and like most of us, have a near encyclopedic knowledge of it.  Yet sound quality is all over the map to the point that many titles have become nearly unlistenable on my best system.  Which leads me back to my question: Is it the sound or the music?  Maybe it’s both. You’ve just got to have one or the other!
jdmccall56

Showing 5 responses by jjss49

freddie hubbard on cti

red clay
sky dive
first light
straight life

👍👍👍👍
assembling a system that can deal with the wide wide range of recording quality of the various forms and sources of music we listen to is a key learned skill in this pursuit

that been said, it is still hard to have cake and eat it too... whereever on the spectrum you choose for your system’s tonality

and oh, yes, to the top line question... it is about the music... the brilliant music... they system is there to convey and hopefully not distract
there are many good sounding, well engineered jazz labels... to me though, manfred eicher's ecm sets the bar as the gold standard over the years and still, today

you must like the selection of music/artists though... 
@oregonpapa 

i rewatched the 9th episode of ken burn's jazz documentary... was reminded of clifford brown, lester young/lady day, horace silver... what a lovely show and the talent of these artists was tremendous... they shaped the jazz we listen to today
indeed o-papa

one of the great beauties of streaming is to be able to cue up all these wonderful old artists’ recordings and revisit anew...

was just listening to dexter gordon coleman hawkins and monk tonight 👍👍

btw - monk was always a genius... just took you a while to get it 🤭🤭