Sota or Technics


Hello all, first time post here. 
I am in the market for a new TT under 2k. I've narrowed it down to the Sota Comet and the Technics 1200GR.
Going to use a $300 to $500 MM cart. 
System consists of NAD533 TT (currently). NAD pre amp, Cambridge Phono pre amp, Mac 240 amp, TDL compact monitors. 
Sota i like as it uses the 330 tonearm, is built in the states, solid rep, solid support, is pleasing to the eye.
Technics I like as it's built like a tank, seems more plug and play has a good rep and looks good too. (more bells and whistles, both positive and negatives there)
Obviously they are different in some ways. Direct drive vs belt etc..
Was wondering if anyone had an opinion either way on either deck. Greatly appreciate any feedback.
Thank you
128x128Ag insider logo xs@2xdoyle3433
I would love the 1200G. but full disclosure I'm also trying to budget for some new or new to me loudspeakers. I love my TDL's but it's time for a change. My hope was to upgrade TT and speakers for around $4 to $5k. 
I mostly listen to jazz, big band to some fusion, Rock of all kinds. 
I like that both the Sota and Technics are daily drivers if you will. I mean no offence to any of the upper crust players. 
I look at it this way. I have a wonderful Triumph that I don't drive often, great car, fun to work on, fun but scary to drive. I also have a mildly modified Mazda MX5 and drive the snot out of it. Guess that's the long winded thought process. 
I worked in a high end store back in the early 90's. 
Glad I found this site, reminds me of such good times. 
It really is down to the arm. Everybody knows I am a big Sota fan. But, I'm afraid the first "real" Sota is the Sapphire. At the Comet's price point they can not put in a suspension. However, Sota has a lifetime trade in policy. So if your decide you want to move up you send in the Comet and they will credit you (not sure how much) towards your new table. 
Having said all that the RB300 is a better arm than what is on the Technics which is going to be more significant sonically. I have not listened to this Technics but I have never liked the sound of direct drive turntables. My main experience with them was decades ago, I must have sold and set up 100 of them at Luskin's Hi Fi. So, take it what it is worth. The Technics is cool looking and made well. The Goldring 1042 is IMHO the best buy in a MM cartridge. The AT VM series is also a great buy. The Goldring is perfect with the RB300. It might be a little too compliant for the Technics. The AT cartridges are fine in either. There is also Grado, Soundsmith and Clearaudio to consider. The best moving magnet cartridge I have ever heard is the Clearaudio Charisma but is not the best value. The Goldring is close and 1/3rd the price. The AT VN93ML at $170 is another amazing value. The one I set up had a stylus rake angle that was way off -87 degrees I think it was. it was actually tilted the wrong way
requiring me to raise the back of the arm quite a bit. Azimuth was fine.
I also listen to big band and own a 1200GR. I don’t know the details of the Sota arm, but the technics has removal head shells. A must if you listen to 10” 33s and 78s on a single table.  It also has push button speed control. It is based on the SP 10 & 15 moreso than the original 1200s. Transcribers swear by those models. I also own a belt drive Trovatore with the same capabilities. Between the two I find the Technics more precise, and very strong in the mids. Also, the soundstage is wider - but not as deep. I can’t comment on the cartridge choice. I prefer MC carts. Again, the discs - needle size - may limit you on the cartridges. 
Looks like you're sold on the Technics, especially since you actually like its appearance. The quality of the sound of a direct drive TT is dependent on the quality of the drive motor. Quiet motors are expensive to manufacture and that price has to be passed down to the consumer. In the price range you are considering, both tables are compromises and will work well for you, but the real players will take a little larger financial commitment.
I’m normally a fan of belt-drive tables, however, I recently acquired a 1210GR and am very impressed with the sound quality it produces. I’ve owned quite a few turntables including a handful of vintage direct-drive tables. This is the first table I’ve encountered that I feel mostly combines the best sonic attributes of belt and direct-drive. I can only surmise this is due to the core-less motor, or maybe that it allows the user to choose the motor’s torque level (which I set to its lowest). Whatever the case, it doesn’t exhibit nearly as much of the character I previously found objectionable with direct-drives.

Sure, I’d rather have a Palmer or SME 20, but for a mere mortal’s budget, I doubt there is anything better under $2K (my reference is a belt-drive setup that last retailed for over $4K).

The GR’s arm is no slouch BTW. I have a nearly new $800 Jelco arm in my closet that I could fit to the GR but don’t foresee that I’ll ever bother.