What do audiophiles want from a cable?


What should a high quality interconnect or speaker cable do to the sound of a system? Make it more transparent? Improve the sound stage and focus? Soften unpleasant highs? Tighten the base? Bring out the mids?

To me, a good cable should reveal more of what is on the recording and more of the true nature of my components. So when trying new cables, I look for more detail and accuracy without becoming cold and clinical. This seems logical, and yet after reading reviews and trying a few of the cables in the reviews, I find that the cables that have received glowing endorsements are not especially transparent or revealing. They modify the sound, but they don’t take me where I want to go. I wonder if the reason I don’t hear what the reviewer heard is that I don’t know what to listen for. Am I too focused on cable accuracy and resolution, and not enough on actual sound quality? Or is it just a case of no two systems sounding alike so why trust a review anyway? Thanks.
mward
I bet that Zero gauge thing would  beat the so called level 7 anti-cable, MTWTFS, and even on Sundays all seasons.

It is unlikely that you don’t know what to listen for, or am too focused on cable accuracy and resolution, and not enough on actual sound quality.

- it just a case of no two systems sounding alike so why trust a review anyway? 

- but I'd also be leery of trusting a Reviewer who gets any compensation (incl. ads) from a co. whose products are reviewed

- What you CAN trust is a blind listening test - both A/B and extended on familiar program material
 Interesting idea and if it is indeed the better method, then expect to see "laser cables" in the future Obi Wan.  

I don't get why you are not feeling the "fluid" chrisr.  Seems pretty brilliant to me.  I mean Jim Aud's concoctions(fluid,ferox,contego) used for mechanical damping of the vibrating conductor(among other things), seem to do the job very well in my setup.  The result is IMHO, the most quiet cable in audio that I've used.  I have heard the effects of all three brews in my system.  All made positive improvements at the time of insertion!  For example, the Purist Audio Design LE power cable jacketed in a bath of Jim's blend of fluid and ferox called Contego, gave a loud wake up call for me when used with my Lampizator DAC.  I think John McG has experience with this cable as well?  I don't know about him, but using this cable in my system produced a wow moment.  I preferred it over the Elrod EPS Signature cables that were also very impressive, just not at the level of the PAD LE in my setup.  I think it was the Contego bath that helped to create an immensely dense and powerfully presented field of lifelike sound.  "Room boundaries be gone" type of experience.  Incredible performance that is sadly out of my price range lately.

@ Inna..after all this discussion and your input, I am considering swapping in Poseidon ic from Lampizator to MA7000 for awhile.  This would mean other than the WyWires Platinum USB, I would have PAD only signal cables, which is what you are doing if I understand correctly your previous posts.  After hearing my system with PAD Ultimate USB, Venustas Luminist ic, then Venustas Preasto ic, to Musaeus speaker cable and Venustas jumpers, I am curious to try more PAD. So my question is Inna, can you give me impressions of Poseidon in comparison to Neptune in your system? or have you only experience with Neptune please sir?  Gonna try debunking my own "do not loom" theory before it's all said and done.  I also want to try the fluid/ferox combo again.  In the past it was Proteus Provectus from DAC and Venustas between preamp and amp.  I ended up preferring the Jade Vermeil Gold w/Bybees over Proteus Provectus at the time.  Btw, WyWires Platinum and PAD Ultimate USB cables are both top performers here. Hard to decide betwixt these two awesome USB cables.  Thanks Inna