where do you cross over your ht setup


hello. i am just wondering where everybody else crosses over there ht system at. thx says 80hz with speakers set to small. some speaker co. say set front mains at 60hz the rest set at 80hz set to small. i even read one speaker co. in a reveiw say 20-30hz and set speakers to large. if you are driving a full range speaker system with a stand alone powered sub what do you fellow audiogoners find best. also when using a spl meter do you set up your system at 75? thanks.
theaterhome
I guess no one can answer this one.

Question to you...Why do you think that a cone driver mounted in the main enclosure is superior to a similar (perhaps identical) cone driver mounted in a different box?
Six of one: half a dozen of the other.

Well regarded subwoofers are described as "fast". Surely that is the same thing as saying that they are capable of relatively high frequency reproduction. The subwoofer system that I built includes 15" JBL drivers that were used as woofers in their speaker systems crossed over at 800 Hz. Obviously 80 or 90 Hz is no problem.
I use two REL Strata III and Sonus Faber EAII, believe me, the speakers sound much sharper around 80hz then the subwoofers, thats why I xover at 60hz...

This is not a "cientific" statement, just what I hear...
Yeah really, a good subwoofer/speaker should have no problem playing "accurately"(relative term) up to 80hz! I know I've read and heard many many many times where reviewers talked about the sub they were discussing not being able to play as well up to 80 hz! THIS IS MOSTLY NOT AN ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF WHAT'S REALITY for many situations! Many subs do just fine, even superb at being played hard up to 80 hz and beyond! There becomes problems with dirrectionality and lack of coherence with the main speakers they're crossing over too, as well as poor sub placment in the room, and improper level matching and such at those frequencies however!...Again, user error!
I will conceed that MANY, YES MANY subs are built to be able to take and playback the much more demanding(less accurate musically i'll conceed) dynamic and synthetic sound from movie soundtracks! This becomes a power handling issue. Thus, they are built with a lower "Q factor", or tightness paramater compared to many music woofers built into many speakers!!!...yes! I know that.
Still, there are NUMBEROUS SUBS THAT NOT ONLY HAVE EXCELLENT EXTENSION, BUT ARE VERY TIGHT(high "Q") and accurate as well! Many THX sub's are such, like M&K's superb MX200/350/5000, etc. Paradigms Servo 15 and PS1000(budget) are very tight and extended!! Infact, for the money, you CANNOT BEAT THE SERVO 15 FOR EITHER MOVIES OR MUSICAL ACCURACY AND IMPACT/EXTENSION FOR THE MONEY, PERIOD! I've found no better sub at this price EVER!!! The higher-end Velodynes are ok. But an other turely dynamite all around woofer is the Earthquake...yes! But there are many others out there at different price ranges and budgets, that have no problem(if set up correctly, which is the downfall of most, conceeded).
The reality, regardless, is that, even with some SLIGHT compromises in some "looser" designed subs, FOR MOVIES AT LEAST, the compromises and trade-off's out-weigh the disadvatages of a potentially truely "accurate" bass note at and around the 80hz range! I mean you can still get truely superb results sonically with a lot of care taken. And I think the advantages out-weigh the con's!
Still, that said, you can negate any real aregument in the debate of letting your more "likely" musically accurate bass woofers in your mains vs. crossing down to a woofer in the HIGHLY DEMANDING BASS reigion for HT, by simply getting one of the better subs!
Think about it..if you were building a subwoofer with a built in powered driver, there should be no reason to think you couldn't design a woofer with better control and accuracy than what an equivalent sized woofer in your speakers offered! This is handled much more commonly by powered full range speaker designs, like those offered by Dunlavy, Infinity, NHT, Paradigm, Avantgarde, Phase Tech, Snell, Linn, Klipsch, JBL, and many others! The woofers in those speakers in mention, are very very dynamic, fast, coherent, and well integrated!..there's no reason to think it's not possible to properly set up an external woofer to do the exact same job, with the same results with proper care and know-how!!
Still, again, for what movies are demanding dynamically, even if you are chosing a less than optimally accurate subwoofer design for your system, crossing over the work to the sub still outweighs any dissadvantage you'll likely need to consider for movies!
Now if you like to listen to your much less dynamically demanding music material "full range" through your speakers, then you can always drop the sub, and have no worries! But for what you need for "thill factor", "impact", authority, dynamics, etc from a movie soundtrack, you simply are making a major mistake by not allowing that all to play properly through your system, by not letting the powered sub handle the dirty, and highly demanding bass chores!!...and that includes up to 80hz I'm affraid.
But, if you are affraid, then just go buy one of the better more accurate subs (paradigm PS1000,Servo 15, M&K MX series, Thiel's expensive sub, Velodyne's HGS(OK), Earthquake Supernova's(superb all around), etc, and you'll have no problems if you set up up right!!!!
I must mention something that I've known for years however regarding bass and overall potential "dynamic transparancy" from a speaker system! That being that passive design speakers and external (even high powered) amp set up's really can't reproduce an accurate(again, relative term...as nothings perfect) and "totally dynamically transparent" pressentation!..especially in the bass!!!
I've known for years, as do many speaker makers, that horns, and active drivers do a much better job of reproducting fundamentals closer to "true dynamic transparancy" with all likely sonic info that's likely to pass through the system! True dynamic control, and thus "accurate playback" of info, from say the bass region, requires as much power and as high of a damping factor as possible! Given most passive speaker systems inability to adequately provide control over the rather inadequately "underdamped" passive crossover network/driver configurations, the lister, ESPECIALLY WITH "UNATURAL" SOUND EFFECT RIDDLED MOVIE MIXES, has to listen to a rather less than optimally dynamic and transparent sonic pressentation, due to physical restraints of the playback system! Again, every time I hear a much more realistic and potentially accurate bass program from "active speakers", much more highly efficient speaker systems, and "active powered speakers" in general!!!! It's just the way it is.
So, for me, any time I can get an active woofer/driver in play, I try to do so if the trade-off's don't outweigh the benefits!
I think, for most peoples peice of mind, they would be better running their audiophile speakers full range for their more likely "less dynamic" music needs, and cross over to the sub to handle the "unreasonablly dynamic" digital movie information! Because inevitably, you know people are going to be facing compromises...I just think doing with I mentioned limites the compromises, and maximizes the benefits and effectiveness of the system for the needs!
It's all good though....
Well, I dont think two REL Strata III, (they are closed boxes, so should have a reasonable Q, tightness), in a not too large golden ratio room, 15 x 24 x 9, are what you call inadequate subwoofers...
I agree that the power is in the hands of the sub.Most manufactured subs are not able to reproduce the bass of six channels.Not that they all are producing bass all the time because they are not.I watched the whole movie saving private ryan and the movie is in the sub.Build it big with out board amps and custom drivers and you too will feel what they felt in the post production studio.THX standards work.They work because of the practical use of subs handling the bass.Case closed
I´ve had the next door neighbour knocking on my door because there was a war going on his living room, I was watching Saving Private Ryan... ;)

Any way, what I really love to listen to properly is music, and I hear mainly the great sound tracks on movie and concert DVDs, the explosions and such are also there, very realistic too, I never fail to be fooled by rain and thunder on movies, always look out the window...

Music is my priority, movies are yours, we are both happy, cheers... :)

Enjoy the hollydays, and have a great 2004...
I must admit that a LARGE PART OF MY BIAS stems from my "long running" complaint regarding the shor-comings of passive systems in closely proximating "dynamic transparency" on the whole!
I still remember the first "real" high-end system I heard many years ago. The guy who's home system it was my pleasure to have heard, had a completely active system, that just blew me away!!!!...I din't hear anything even remotely close to that system, dynamically at least, until many many years later. His system was so dynamic IT HURT!!! There was soooooooo much power and dynamic ability there, that it left everything else I heard rather flat sounding and "gut-less" by comparison over the years.
Granted, that system was also very refined and "high-end" sounding as well...not just strong and dynamic!
That said, ESPECIALLY IN REGARDS TO HOME THEATER, I have very little impatience with whimpy sounding passive speaker sysetms that can't DELIVER THE GOODS when it comes to dynamic transparancy and general power deliver/dynamics!..which I think a good HT system should do.
I think more high end speaker makers should be building, at the very least, active woofers(for the demanding bass) into their speakers!
I have talked with many high end designers, and I find that the arguments they usually offer are "cost factor", "flexibility", "tradition", "practicality"(heat build up, space issues, etc),"public acceptance"! To me, I think the only "move-up" that can be made in transducers is to do more active speaker/woofer designs!
It's this reason, not to mention that that's what the "home theater experts" in the field have found, that I think the only way to really handle bass magangement in a passive sysetem, is to enlist the help of a crossover to a powered woofer of some sort!..it's like effectively bi-amping your system, and adding and active woofer to your bass chores...it's closer to what you need for dynamic accuracy.
If people don't want to do this, no problem. But don't think you're going to blow anyone away with your action adventure demo's at home!...that's all I'm saying. Because a lot of what's "exciting" and "involving" from a movie soundtrack, is the "dynamic ability", and authority a good movie has to offer...and a sound system needs to portray that more than anything!...that and dialog inteligibilty and lack of coloration.
Interesting link to read on spare time.

[/http://www.harman.com/wp/index.jsp?articleId=122/]
Here we go again!.. I've been pondering much of what has been said above on this subject and decided to do some more checking on the matter. Here's an excerpt of an email I sent my friend regarding this dilemma and his reply. Said friend works very closely with the engineer who helped create the spec for THX Ultra2 (among other projects) in the Bay Area. Names have been changed to protect the innocent. To wit:

Dear Mr. X,
I have a quick tech question for you regarding THX
equipped processors/receivers. There's been a lively
thread on Audiogon.com in the "Home Theater"
discussion forum regarding where to properly set the
crossover for bass management for movies and home
theater. There's lots of debate regarding why it's
better to set your crossover to 80hz and set your
speakers to "small" (even if you run "large" front
speakers) to maximize dynamic range. Others say it's
better to set the crossover lower depending on where
the main speakers rolloff.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it true that
regardless what type of speakers you tell your Dolby
Digital processor you have (large or small) and where
you set the crossover point for bass during initial
setup, doesn't THX override those settings and default
back to an 80hz crossover, set all speakers to
"small", and route (or "sum") all LFE to the active
sub when THX processing is engaged? It seems to me
that's the only way THX could reasonably ensure proper bass
management and to coax the maximum dynamic range from
a 100 or 120-watt THX-equipped receiver which most likely will be used in a
variety of potential systems with different
brands/specs of speakers, room size, etc.
I'd love to hear your thoughts on this!

Mr. X's reply:

"Regarding your question, funny thing, (name omitted) called last week
with
the same question. You are correct, the crossover point is 80hz, no
matter
what size speaker is being used. As for your explanation, you nailed
it on
the head." (End)

I hope this helps to clear the air at least a little bit especially for those running receivers and/or processors equipped with THX processing. If max dynamic range is your goal for movies and HT, THX knows a thing or two about helping you get there!

Cheers!
JZ