What type of speaker would sound better?


 

1. mid-tier 3 way with multiple lower quality drivers and parts OR

2. High end 2-way with premium crossover parts and speaker drivers. 

Either one could be a stand mount, small tower, or anything in between.

For example you listen to a well recorded symphony in a 15 X 30 living room. You have 250w @ 8ohms. You start on a mid tier 3-way and then on a high end 2-way system, which do you think would sound better?

 

dtapo

You say lower quality vs higher quality and that’s a very subjective decision to make. You should get an idea what matters to you. Personally I would always go on the quality side, but I haven’t experienced much hearing degradation and understand what I like. If those circumstanced changed, it’s always nice to have the full range speaker if it fits the room better.

Another thought is that sometimes a great 2 way and a high quality pair of subs betters a 3 way speaker. It’s hard to get good bass in a speaker for under 15k at least.

Gaddy, I appreciate your opinion and agree with it, however when a manufacturer that has hundreds of thousands of employees and an incredible economy of scale significantly drives down the cost over time- 94 million cars made each year. A car door might cost $20 after the first 5 million. Still, I'm generally in agreement with your point.

Whatever sounds best to you. Because speakers sound different to everyone and we all have different preferences. Go demo some.

Actually, a high end 2-way would be better depending on transducer specs.  A good wide range speaker that can produce good lows and mids along with high end high frequency driver would sound fantastic.  Less losses in crossovers for 2-way vs 3-way. 

@dtapo 

With symphonic music and your room size a two-way stand mount speaker will struggle to deliver appropriate scale and dynamics unless a higher efficiency larger speaker like a DeVore Fidelity or Audio Note. 

I suggest you state your budget and ask for recommendations.