Also, another caveat - depth of soundstage a result of getting more time-correct low-level detail from your system. It seems that the precise imaging of echoes and the decay of instruments in the apparent acoustic space now appear - like putting on your glasses, if you're myopic. If you like live recordings and classical, you may prefer this kind of sound. Pop, rock and small-ensemble jazz might sound a bit too subdued in this case. (Since most of us grew up listening to that on a totally soundstage-less boombox, old habits and expectations die hard) But 'laid back' could describe a psychoacoustic phenomenon where there is a little dip in the midrange (exactly where, I am not sure, but somebody mentioned this some newsgroup a long time ago), and this gives a 'laid-back' sound. The human ear is most sensitive in the midrange area; with the midrange being attenuated a bit, it makes the bass and treble comparatively louder. In my experience, this is much less satisfying than the first case - having a deep soundstage. I even had 2 power cables that manifest each phenomenon above exactly in my system! You should try and see which one plagues your system, then correct accordingly...
too laid back, or deeper soundstage?
With every equipment upgrade I do I notice the sound is more and more laid back. I guess you can say the stage is getting deeper. But on some recordings I miss the immediacy, especially on vocals. My upgrades were as follows, Adcom amp to CJ, MIT 330 to new shotgun cables, and MSB DAC to Sony SACD. Each upgrade improved the sound in every other way. My speakers are likely next to go. I currently have Spica TC-60's. I listened to Audio Physic Tempo's and they seem even further laid back. Any suggestions on speakers? What about cables? Cables seem to have made a big difference and are probably easiest to upgrade. Opinions? Don't audiophiles want performers in the room? What is this, "it sounds like your sitting in row Z" talk?? Do listeners prefer this?
10 responses Add your response