My wife says she will "spay" me if I keep trying to tweak things.
91 responses Add your response
Post removed |
Post removed |
Post removed |
Post removed |
Light is not effected by magnetic fields so drop that as an issue for reading the CD, only after it has been converted to electrical signals will it be effected by the magnetic fields. vibrations, out of round, miss reads etc are the issues and no amount of snake oil on the CD will stop that. clean scratch free CD is the best we can do. |
@roberjerman +1 to Geoff pointing out the analog nature of the reading of the binary digital code. Any "tweaks" that enable your player or transport to read the digital data on your silver discs will yield sonic benefits. As far as "Spaying", I treat every CD or SACD with Rain-X. No, it's not just for windshields!💿📀 |
roberjerman Digital data storage is not analog-like at all! It exists independent of the physical properties of the storage medium! This is the revolutionary change in music storage and retrieval! Analog- like fixes do not apply (sprays, green pens, trimming the edges,weighted pucks, demagnitizers ... ). >>>>Actually, while it’s true the physical data on a CD is unalterable, the process of reading the data is an analog process, an optical process. And therein lies the problem. Because the laser reading process is not perfect, even with Reed Solomon codes and laser servo mechanism, the physical data is subject to misinterpretation/error caused by any of a variety of things, vibration of the CD transport, background scattered laser light, magnetic fields, static electric charge, and others, even the color of the CD label. Don’t be a digital denier. Join the thousands of happy campers who use vibration isolation, coloring of CD, beveling the edges of CDs, demagnetizers, static charge neutralizers, CD sprays, whatever they can think of to improve the sound. Don’t be an ostrich. Don’t be a cube, rube, go ape! |
The best product I have seen for CDs is the AudioDesk CD Sound Improver. It trims and balances the CD so it has less jitter and is easier to read. We did tests ripping a CD and then ripping it again after using the AudioDesk. The CDs we tried all ripped around 10% quicker after the AudioDesk. Which means that there were less errors that had to be re-read. |
There was a CD treatment shootout quite some time ago. Lotions Eleven by the illustrious Clark Johnsen in Positive Feedback. It might have been updated to Lotions Twelve. Kind of been a while. 😳 I’ve had a lot of em over the years, Liquid Resolution was Top Dog, and would you believe I stumbled on my stash of Liquid Res just last week? Oh, my! I didn’t get off on Essence of Music. Optrix is OK. Jena Labs is very good. |
I've heard good things about this https://www.musicdirect.com/equipment/optrix-cd-cleaner-clarifier New thread... https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/are-there-any-really-good-cd-cleaners-out-there?highlight=CD%... |