Sound quality differences in streamers


Can there be sonic differences between moderate and high priced streamers when used for streaming only. I will not use or engage an onboard DAC or any other feature, just stream from Tidal or Amazon to DAC. If the unit is just transferring zeros and ones to a DAC can there be differences in say a $300 WiiM and a $3000 dSC streamer? Thanks

kckrs

@paqua123 

About logging in. I have a desktop, laptop and three iPads. I use Audiogon daily. I end up logging on to one of the devices maybe once a month while using them all constantly. Sounds like you are doing something that makes it difficult. Are you closing down your browser completely between uses?

@verdantaudio - As with @sns, I too prefer the Roon server operating core to be separate from the endpoint/renderer.  My first server/streamer (after moving away from my customized Mac mini) was the Antipodes DX a one-box server/streamer, similar to the current K50.  Based on my successful time with the DX, I am sure the K50 is a great sounding unit.  However, I have found that separating the server and streamer offers potential benefits that work well for me, including,

  • Locate the server in a separate room near the network equipment and not in the main music system room,
  • separate potentially noiser, higher powered processing duties performed by the server from the final processing/reclocking duties performed by the Roon endpoint unit,  
  • position the streamer/endpoint in the main system room so the cable from endpoint to DAC can be short,
  • separate units allow allocating a greater proportion of the available funding into the steamer/endpoint, which some believe has a greater impact on the sound than the unit performing the file storage/server/Roon core duties,
  • separate units make it easier to maintain and upgrade one or the other, without needing to upgrade a more expensive combination server/streamer.  

Of course, there is more than one way to get good sound and many prefer to simply purchase a single, high-performing, one-box solution like the Antipodes DX or Oladra, Grimm MU1 or MU2, Aeon 432 EVO, or similar.

@mitch2 i agree wholeheartedly.  The only caveat I would make is that the K50 and Oladra may be one box but they each have two computers and a clock in them. That is, a high powered server, a separate mid powered endpoint and then a clock. Two separate computers/motherboards with discrete power supplies.  The only thing that is common is the power cord and the chassis.  The others mentioned are one box solutions with one computer. 

verdantaudio,

I'm not a dealer, just an end-user. I've owned several Antipodes Audio music servers. I've compared Antipodes to other music servers and have preferred Antipodes to Aurender, Innuos, and several others. I have the Oladra now and it's my last music server. 

@ricred1    I love the Oladra.  I personally run the Oladra at home as well and have for several years.  I have no interest in replacing it.  This unit will not be my last. I turn my samples over and I will buy another Oladra.