Send in the Clowns


I have just watched a review of a monoblock on another site. I will not mention the site nor the monoblock brand name. What I found funny was that the reviewer did not listen to the amplifier at all. All he did as measure it and say this is fantastic.His ears did not come into it at all. What a clown.

laoman

I like measurements derived from good engineering and science, including user studies that ask critical questions about what groups of listeners perceive as better. By looking deeply at the science and how human hearing appears to operate we can get better reproduction equipment. We certainly want, at first blush, equipment that accurately reproduces the original recording which means we want exceptional fidelity that can be assessed via principled measurements. Now some folks like coloring the reproduced sound to suit their preferences. Luckily, we are in a golden age where DSP can be used to achieved almost any outcome and room treatments can compensate where DSP can’t quite deliver. At least we can measure those outcomes, though!

But I do like this hobby and the musical journey, and especially like that we have great measurement resources that can help us distinguish exceptionally engineered equipment from merely overpriced and underwhelming hype.

If it wasn't a tube amp, then it doesn't matter. It will sound the same as every other amp ever made. Clown.

" It will sound the same as every other amp ever made. Clown."
I am glad you admit that this statement is a clownish one. It has to be satire as this is completely absurd.

As a matter of interest, the head clown, whose name I still will not mention, now claims he knows more than Bruno Putzeys. Both the arrogance and self delusion are strong in this one.

Ask yourself these two questions. Can I live with and be happy with my audio equipment if it measures really well but doesn’t sound great? Conversely, can I live with and be happy with my audio equipment if it sounds great but doesn’t measure well at all?

More to discover