Removing the lid of your amp/preamp


I have seen audiophiles remove the cages of their equipments be it SS or Valves. Some swear there is a sonic benefit to it. Anyone has done this?
dalton
I have done it with a Cary tube preamp but for heat dissipation not sonics. I am no running with the cover back in place now because who wants to dust circuit boards?

I noticed no discernable differences with or without the cover.

Ralph
Removing the cage doesn`t automatically bestow sonic benefits. I`ll grant it MAY facilitate ventilation in pwr. amps which tend to generate max heat. The downside is that it can make gear susceptible to the dreaded RFI & EMI. Tube gear is generally more @ risk of RFI than SS. While not all tube amps fall victim, with these it IS more the nature of the beast.
Sure. Removing tube cages or the lids on tube amps/pre-amps can accomplish 2 things, one all the time the secord some of the time. 1) Improve heat disapation, 2)Eliminate surfaces which can or do resonate without having to add weight to damp them. I would only avoid doing this on CDP's because of the additional dust build-up possibly effecting operation of the laser. Removing lids on SS stuff - I would only do this if I had to to damp a transformer hum. Can't think of much other benefit, but perhaps some ss experts can sign in with their views.
I only take mine off once a year to blow the dust out. Never had a heat issue and I would be afraid of some freak accident that could result in a short from something dropping on a circuit board. Oh and I take the covers off to change the bulbs....it's a McIntosh thing.
Tube pre-amp is fine to remove lid. Solid State amp is a very bad idea. The SS amp bias is set according to temperature. Remove the lid and the amp will be all over the map in regards to stability/performance due to too much heat loss.
It appears many missed this exchange from a couple of months ago -

"One tweak that I tried that makes a BIG difference is playing the amp with the cover off. When the cover is on, electromagnetic waves bounce off the metal and back into the amplifiers circuitry. When the cover is off, you will be surprised how much better it sounds."

Then the other Mensa candidate responds -

"Honestly, electromagnetic bounce effect sounds like pseudo-science to me, but if the XX sounds better with its top off, then top-off it shall be!"

Honest. Amazing stuff. You couldn't make it up if you tried. “Electromagnetic bounce”- maybe it could be teamed up with soundstaging power cords (OK, chords) to positive effect. Too funny.
Tube pre-amp is fine to remove lid. Solid State amp is a very bad idea. The SS amp bias is set according to temperature. Remove the lid and the amp will be all over the map in regards to stability/performance due to too much heat loss.

This gave me a bit of a start since I had not heard of such prior and because after I had Steve McCormack do his Platimnum mods to my DNA-225, I had told him of my plans to install a 3/8" thick piece of smoked polycarbonate as a replacement top plate. I drilled mnay holes (in the pattern of the stylized McCormack "M" logo) and additionally have the piece stand off above the sides all around via 1/4" nylon lugs. Steve thought it sounded a good idea. After reading this, I contacted SMc Audio today and got this intial response from Steve's great right-hand man, Kris Jeter:

"The DNA amplifiers bias remains very consistent and within the optimum performance window with the top cover off or on (unless it's subjected to gusts of cool air in an otherwise stable environment) and since removing the metal top cover can result in better sound, I would say that your setup with the polycarbonate top cover is optimum."

I subsequently got this response from Steve:
"A "well-designed" bias system should track thermally, and should be able to keep up with any gradual temperature shift. It is true that removing the topcover would allow air gusts to make the amp's internal *air* temperature less stable, but bias systems typically track the heatsink temperature, and these are usually external, anyway. It is true that transient variation in air temperature might cause relatively rapid changes in the operating point of some smaller devices not linked to the bias system, but this type of sensitivity will vary a lot from one design to another. I would say that thermal stability is a good thing in general, but most of us don't have strong winds blowing through our listening rooms, so I don't see removing the topcover as a problem. In fact, I do it all the time, and I don't hear any problem with my designs."