older speaker designs


So I haven't really paid attention to hifi for a while for many reasons, but am now looking for new floor standing speakers.
My focus has been on the Revel Performa3 f206 lately for a couple reasons. Good performing speaker, size fits where they will be placed, and spouse approval factor is high as they are good looking speakers.
My concern is this. I think Revel unveiled the f206 back in 2013 or 2014. As the design is now closing in on 10 years old, should that concern me? Is the pace of technology innovation/advancement in speaker design about to make the f206 obsolete? Should I be concerned?
gwb72tii
I agree! It was an excellent speaker then - and remains an excellent speaker today! Plus buying on the used market allows you substantial savings!
I have speakers 70+ years old.. They sound as good as they did new.  In a lot of cases, BETTER... What is suppose to wear out? Surrounds?
The old Co/Ax RED center have cloth surrounds, they will last as long as the cones, 100+ years. Silicone is your friend..

Everything requires maintenance. I don't care who makes it.. I've bought speakers at least 25 times with LOOSE drivers, screws missing.. Sound REAL bad....

Two hours later.. Better than new.. It's always air leaks, whether surrounds or loose drivers.

Why better? I didn't have to break them in.. :-)

Regards
Really good question. Don’t be concerned at all. My answer, however, does not pertain to your prospective f206’s. I know little about them. I am using speakers that I purchased 31 years ago, that I love more than ever because they fit my needs, like the Revels seem to fit yours.

They are 2-way floor-standers with a butyl woofer surround that I think will be in pristine shape forever. In 2009, I had tweeters rebuilt by a guy who bought the factory tooling. My point is that if failures can be repaired (and there are independent repair shops with very talented techs), you could enjoy those speakers for decades and decades.  Unless a future technology obsolete’s everyone’s speakers.  Highly unlikely. I’ve read many times that basic speaker technology has not changed all that much and that the art is in implementation of drivers, XO’s and cabinet.  Of course, the artist is aided by an understanding of  acoustic science and the use of high quality parts.

Fitting your space properly or ideally is very important and not terribly easy to replicate, particularly when tied to WAF. I literally like mine more than ever because with each improvement I make around them, they sound better. Your experience could be the same.  Since 2017, I educated myself on proper room set up, bought a very good integrated amp (then modded it up 2019), in 2018 modded all speaker XO parts, wires and posts, 2020 got better (but not expensive) speaker wires, and just last month finally added a really nice streamer to my system.

Frankly, I’ve always loved the sound signature of my speakers. So much, in fact that I literally have searched episodically for some years to find a speaker that would sound even better to me or be a viable replacement should mine fail and not be repairable (my tweeters are 100% proprietary, made by the company itself).  These auditions have revealed that new designs don’t sound better to me despite a 30 year lapse in time. I will be the first to admit when I find a design that hands mine their hat.  But, it has to fit nicely in my room which brings me back to one of your Revels attributes. I did find a speaker I liked very much, but it was way too big for my narrow room and had side-firing woofers. Audio Physic, Codex. The smaller AP model did not sound good to me (or anyone else at the demo, frankly—including the salesman), and they were $8K and 30 years newer. AP uses top drawer engineering and parts from what I have heard but that model didn’t sing to anyone in the room.
Sorry so long, but I wanted to explain the basis of my view that, as a consumer of audio products, I believe the “technological advances” in speaker-building should give you zero pause. I say “as a consumer” in hopes of preventing anyone who wishes to debate the point of technological progress. I don’t wish to have a debate.

Using better parts in a well-designed product can be hugely beneficial, however. That’s what my mods were about.  Like much better tires on a car you like. But first....you like the car’s performance at factory spec, then you seek to enhance it with some better parts.
thanks for the detailed explanation of why "not to worry". As I mentioned I've been out of hifi for some time, and coming back it's easy to get overwhelmed by the "hype" of why one is better thank the other. 
My required speaker placement in our front room is not perfect for optimizing 2 channel stereo, as I suspect is true for most of us. But I do appreciate good sound even if I may not be sitting in the sweet spot. I have a line on a set of f206's for a decent discount from new, and folks who own them tend to like them. I guess I'll be taking the plunge.
Next on the list will be seeing how my 15yr old integrated drives them.
They are 88dB so no worries, couple hundred watts and you will be okay.
Your 15 year old integrated - assuming it's a decent make and model in the first place -should be fine. Fifteen years ago was 2006; amplifier technology HAS changed in that time, of course, but unless you're going Class D or looking for streaming/HDMI options, a good amp fifteen years ago is going to be a good amp now, aging capacitors and/or tubes notwithstanding.

Revels are superbly made speakers. They'll sound great.
Revel are excellent speakers if you are worried about age I've seen the 226be under $5K. 
My integrated is a Music Hall Maven, 100w
In its day it was thought to be a very good receiver, good upsampling DAC and very good amp
id really like to use it as it’s been in storage for the last 6 years
Well sure won’t cost anything to listen.. I set up one that fit in the palm of my hand (a power amp) I was blown away.. It sounded wonderful. The whole system cost 650.00 tube pre with tone control to boot. 30 year old speakers... the amp is a class d  2.1, 50x2, 100x1. BT, WiFi, ect.

All HD and SACD Sony ES series..

I bet it would match a lot of systems in the SQ. Behind the curtain test.
I haven’t even done cable tweaks yet, (good cables) 650.00 TOTAL

Regards
I wouldn’t worry about the design being of older origin; by and large the speaker-wheel hasn’t been reinvented for ~100 years, contrary to marketing BS and an industry that would have us believe otherwise to keep their wheels turning. It’s the specific implementation that counts, and whether vital parts of the speaker have aged less gracefully to where one should be concerned. Quality speakers should last quite a long time, so in this case I wouldn’t be concerned.
My experience with revel is more watts, more dynamics. The only nk on the f206 is owners find them light in the bass compared to the competition. I spent time with the f208 with an anthem 225i driving them and found them to have an open sound with excellent balance from any seat in the room. I would recommend them for ht all day. Watts are cheap and if your avr has pre outs you can always add a class d amp to drive the revels, if needed.