No preamp in system


 

I want to point out how the perception of our equipment changes over time. I’m getting so use to the sound of my system without a preamp (which is out for repair) to the point that I’m accepting it as good sound.  It reveals something about our hobby.  When we get new equipment we often say “let it break in.”  And lo and behold, it sounds much better over time.  Is it that were really fooling ourselves, and that it’s simply a matter of us getting use to it?

Just food for thought.

rvpiano

Glad to hear you are getting used to it. Likely getting your preamp will be a real treat when returned. 

Good question you pose, of perspective and time. Until about twenty five years ago, I would say my perception was pretty relative. What sounded good, was based on what I heard. There were systems that sounded better... typically based how many details, how much bass, the width and depth of the soundstage. But I think my perception over time could be influenced by exposure and time.  

Then I went out to hear what real music sounded like. Specifically to develop an absolute measure... yardstick. For over twenty years I steeped myself in live acoustic music specifically develop an absolute measure against which to judge my system and system choices. 

I will say that my perception will vary a little... but during that time I also assembled my system to sound like the real thing... so that the absolute is reinforced. So, while I am sure my perception of "good sounding" varies a little... probably not a lot.

I’m pretty sure lots of folks simply wonder around in solution space just comparing one system versus another and in that case lots of drift is likely... I think. 

 

Just a stab at it. 

 

There are many ways to sound “good”. You never know until you try. 

@mrdecibel 

Hi!  I hope all is going well with you too.  
To answer your question: Without the preamp most everything sounds very good, but is missing something. That something is the high frequencies and, to an extent, soundstaging.  And, on some things I think it actually sounds a little better that way. With most things though it lacks a certain presence and excitement.

I agree with @ghdprentice that live music should be your benchmark. Acoustic instruments and voices are the touchstone. I don't really compare components to each other but rather listen for how "real" it sounds in my system. A lot of gear can sound impressive but over time seem artificial in some way. 

When I make changes I use music with singers I've heard live. I have an enduring sense of how their voice expressed emotion and I listen for that. 

I do experience getting "used to" a certain sound and liking it, but that's because it corresponds to my expectations for sounding real. If it doesn't sound that way, I don't get used to it, I get annoyed by it.