My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab
Thanks carey1110. Great to know many readers appreciate the different opinions. 
A fantastic journey, enjoy it !!!! @jetter has it right

next thread: WhiteCougarXRT
One thing is having an opinion and another is attacking someone personally. Let’s not get both things confused. They are far different. It’s one thing to say to someone:
"I personally feel that you are in debt because you work a low paying job"

Another thing is to say:
"You are broke because you are lazy as hell and don’t want to work"

They are both TOTALLY different. I’ve been a victim of both here. I will respect opinions but never an attack or fabricated story about me. That is where I will come out and engage hard with you.
You can tell me you don't like the magnepan or the Logans or the new cables for x , y reason and that you prefer what we did a few videos ago etc and that is fine. I am, WE ARE, all learning as we move forward. 
My opinion is that we have to take the op ´s reviews with a big grain of salt. Here ´s why... and there is absolutely no lack of respect in the following.

The gear is simply changing too rapidly for him to evaluate things correctly.

His love for overwhelming bass presence and listening at very high volume level for years has most probably made his ears less efficient at discerning small nuances in the sound quality reproduction. Requiring more and more powerful amps on steroids...that he thinks are better just because his earing now mostly responds to dynamic changes...

His love for ridiculous wattage ratings, prestigious and costly products plays a big placebo effect here. The fact his misunderstanding audio gear is NOT like cars as to price / results/ quality ratio explains this pretty plainly. It ´s audio circuits, not german engineering...

The continuously mix and match cable shoveling, and the recent use of power cable adapters, renders the latest reviews awkward at best.

The verified fact that the products tried usually find themselves on the Audio Palace dealer web site is just too much concerning to be ignored.

The op lack of empathy for the most of us playing at reasonable msrp level, and the constant reminder of it , is one big reason the ops gets challenged far more in the recent weeks. He makes it a ego thing, we do not.









Post removed 
Like another poster just said, you do not own this thread. You have to live with different opinions as long as they are respectful.
Like another poster just said, you do not own this thread. You have to live with different opinions as long as they are respectful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Firstly, it is imbecilic to continue to take Jay's post as saying he was the owner of this thread.   Did you miss the fact that he referred to the moderators as the custodians and disciplinarians of the thread?  Any common sense reading would indicate that he was/is the sponsor of the thread.  Clearly he doesn't own/possess anything here.


Second, it is also disingenuous to attempt to characterize/cloak personal attacks as opinions.  Nice try.  
Techno would be crying like a baby and blubbering about the unfairness of it all if he was on the receiving end of his nonsense.
Post removed 
Post removed 
WC never treats this thread like he owns it and is generally never disrespectful. Stop arguing for the sake of argument and let him do his thing
kren0006,

Thanks for your listening evaluations of the LRS, Rega, Spendor and Linn speakers.  But you said that compared to the other speakers, the LRS was garbage.  What do you mean by garbage?  I never said that the Alexia 2 or any other speaker WC has presented is garbage, just that these boxes have a canned quality compared to the more open, natural quality of the 20.7.  When I heard Wilsons at a well known dealer, I did think they were all garbage, but WC has built wonderful systems so that what he presents as a total system is certainly nothing like garbage.  I am on record as praising him for nice sound on his videos.  

I freely admit the more powerful bass and overall dynamics of box speakers, but I don't know if you hear the natural quality of planar boxless speakers.  I don't know how much exposure you have had to live unamplified music to appreciate what I am saying.  Most of your listening is to artificial processed music, so if that is your reference, I can understand why you prefer the sound of all those box speakers you mentioned, which give you that type of sound which is artificial box resonances superimposed on top of the intrinsic sound of the drivers themselves.  So I believe that the best hope for the lover of dynamics with a decent degree of clarity is those open baffle (OB) dynamic driver designs.  No, I haven't heard any of them, but I respect the word of tweak1 who has them and has owned the Maggie 3.6R and Acoustat models which are OB planar and electrostatic OB designs, respectively.

In addition, I know you have limitations on the amount of money you are able or willing to spend on a system upgrade.  It is certainly possible that a Wilson or Magico speaker costing over $100K would please me, but I am lucky that my preferred designs are much cheaper.  Electrostatic technology is 100 years old, and most of them are affordable.  Planar ribbons are affordable, like the 20.7.  I am waiting to hear the unique latest GTA planar ribbon.  Combined with their custom 2-6 subs, they promise to be a system that does everything the best, for $30-50K or so.  I will report on this.  OB dynamic driver designs are also modestly priced, and I can see you going for them and having everything you want.  The only "deficiency" of OB speakers is that the bass is not the stomach hitting assault that rock lovers like.  Actually, I regard this as not a deficiency but an advantage since realistic natural bass is tight without that pressurized assault.


Wow, now I’m wondering the need to be on this thread if  the mods are going to stifle discussion. I had a post removed that attacked no one. I did ask greyhound what he thought would happen to this thread if jay were no longer part of it. I sure didn’t mean nor perceive that as an attack on him. Just trying to point out that without jay, the reason for this thread doesn’t exist. The rest of us are expendable, people come and go over time, but that wouldn’t prevent the thread from continuing on its path. Fr9m that 
tecno your post above has many discrepancies from reality of things. Jay dosnt go for products because of an over abundance of bass. I don’t think anyone here feels the Maggie’s have that. When he had the DAWs he said he didn’t see what anyone needed more bass than those had. Though a number of people here have expressed that they do like the additional bass. Crazy wattage? I don’t think so. Maybe to some one who is only into SETs. There’s some much much more powerful amps avaible. Again jay has said that power alone is not what’s important. The reserve capacitance some of these amps have do make a difference he had said. If you’re looking for a thread on moderately priced equipment, this isn’t it. No one is under any obligation to provide that. So not sure why you think he should. There are tons of YouTube channels on that type of equipment, and much less on the higher end like jay does. I think most of us clearly understand what this is about. And that’s why we are here. It’s not an issue if you’re into different equipment, but it’s no reason to knock him for concentrating on what he wants to do. He’s not testing it right? Again, I think most of us understand what he is doing, and no, it’s not the same thing the guys at stereophile, the absolute sound, Steve Gutenberg, etc etc are doing. And by the way, they arnt doing what you’re describing either. He’s doing his own thing. Either you get it or if you don’t, then it’s just not for you. As has been expressed many times, jays way isn’t for everyone. It’s seems you obviously do not like any, or very little of what he does. I don’t participate in threads, or watch channels that can’t hold my interest, but that’s just me. I guess my time is valuable enough to me that I’d rather spend it on things I find to be fun. 
Post removed 
What I meant was that they were vastly inferior in producing music versus the other speakers, in my opinion

Even at $650, I would not buy them. I have $600 Kef q150 as backups in my third system and think they sound much better, inasmuch as I’m able to compare them having owned or seriously demo’d both, albeit in different systems, but even in that store system under same conditions I judged LRS decidedly 4th of 4, as mentioned. Ymmv
Good point Viber about the unamplified music as a reference.  Otherwise we’re just stating what flavor we like.  If you are trying to get close to what is real and true then you must know what that is. On the other side of the coin a persons preference may be to a certain style or genre that is always amplified which may be WCs preference. Can’t say that I’ve heard many violins or flutes on his videos. If that was his preference he might have a different speaker preference or entirely different system. Again personal taste.  BTW I love electrostats but not for every kind of music. 
Hey @whitecamaross : can’t you block this Techno Dude so that he can never see your threads, thus never being able to post in them? At least this is my understanding but I can be wrong.

I have a strong sense he is just messing with you. Like making fun of. The true definition of Troll
The more you guys fuss about him the more you fuel his behavior. Don’t give attention to unwanted behavior. The best way to keep him off this thread ( if that’s what you want, personally I could care less)  is to not read or respond to his post. Plain and  simple. The constant on going Dialog about him is really Unbelievable. 
Carey that is Excellent point you make about musical preference. You’re right. None of WC’s selections have been unamplified Violins, and precisely zero people are asking for that, well except one.


Re other comment about getting back to WC journey, watch the YT vids and post impressions here. Not enough people do that and then the thread gets sidetracked into silliness 
Kren0006 for some reason I can’t post on the video. Must be because I’m using my iPad. Im Subscribed but can make a post. 
no I mean post video impressions here, on A’gon. That’s what we need more of so we don’t have to talk about Vibers pull-ups or Techno’s beefs

i think so far I am only one to comment here about latest vid
That's a good point kren. 
Well, I would like feedback on the last video I uploaded. Any thoughts on what was gained or lost when it comes to the presentation after switching cables ? 
In all your videos with the 175$ vodoo adapters plugged into the 50 000$ Mephisto, what do you think was gained or lost WC ? I would estimate a fair amount of credibility...

By listening at concert level all these years with overwhelming bass, what do you think was gained or lost ? I would estimate your ability to discern the lost decay of notes that was present with the Colosseum that is very much less there with the Mephisto.

But but...the Mephisto is on big time steroids as you always say. What was gained or lost all these years then ? I would estimate the purity of the music that was replaced with the ability to thump your chest ( Wilsons woofers do that). Whats one of the worst jobs in usa with repercussions on human ear drums ? Military is one of them. Viber can surely attest that as a doctor.
TechnoFirst off hearing loss is very interesting I googled 10 worst jobs for hearing.  Just to get the facts straight. 
#10. Hairdresser- multiple hairdryers 85db
#9.  Nursery school teacher, screaming kids 85db
#8. Motorcycle riding wind and motor 104db
#7. Gardener, lawn tools weed whack er etc 107db
#6 DJ in nightclub 115 bd
#5 Carpenter tool saws etc 120 db
#4. Builder,  jackhammers etc 130db
#3. Miner 135db
#2. Formula one race driver 135
#1. The worst job of all is Airport ground control at 140 dB  
I don’t ever recall WC saying he listened at concert levels for years where did you get that from?


 So we all  have some hearing loss If you’re over 40 however that doesn’t prevent us from discerning the difference between audio components. It just means you have a limited frequency range lacking the extremely high frequencies where there is very little music.    BTW the bass is not the damaging part of sound near as much as the loud high frequencies. Hope this puts the hearing issues in perspective. Also WCs videos allow you to listen and discern for yourself. Commenting specifically on what you notice is what we are looking for.  For example maybe you feel the sound quality has changed maybe not for the better,  but I’d like to know what specifically,  is it the sound stage, the high frequencies more or less aggressive etc. not whether or not WC is credible.  What is you perspective on the sound?   I’ve heard the Mephisto with the Wilson sound great and I’m sure WC will find the perfect recipe for many of you,  maybe not all as we are all different and prefer different music. I’m enjoying going on this journey with him,  where else can you do this from you on home. Keep it up WC I like it even if it’s not my journey. 
 

carey1110,
Wonderful post.  Nice info about noise exposure in jobs.  I totally agree that instead of saying something is "better" it would be more useful to describe the specific ways it is "better"--HF, focus, soundstage (forward or laid back), midrange tonality, bass tightness or fullness, etc.

Regarding hearing, everyone loses HF sensitivity through the normal aging process.  Read the wonderful 25 year retrospective by Mike Fremer in the latest Stereophile.  At 73, he says he doesn't have the hearing he had 25 or even 10 years ago, but he says he is a better listener.  I have observed how elderly violin professors perceive so much more than the young student violinists.  Obviously, the young violinists hear better, but the elderly professor points things out that the young violinists missed.  So listening is a lot about judgment and experience.
Tecno, with all the vast knowledge that you seem to feel you have, why won’t you impart that to us with your own you tube channel. With the energy spent telling others how they’re doing it wrong, it seems it would be better spent showing us how to do it right. Instead of negativity, turn it into positive energy. Helping people gives me more self satisfaction then tearing them down. Making others feel bad dosnt do anything to make me feel better.
Yes, please do. You can start with the piece of junk "Dynaudio NOT SO Special 40" you know so much about.
The problem is that in the military not so long ago, very few were using ear protection when exposed to noise. Today things are supposed to have changed for the better.

It’s a shame no cheerleader want to discuss the Vodoo adapters plugged into the Mephisto. This thread is supposed to be about serious products playing at another level. Along with serious reviews, isn’t it ?...

Hey WC, would you review a Ferrari on four chinese 13 inches tires ? Would it be a serious thing to do ?

I don’t have any experience with Vodoo adapters on powercords do you? Do they change things a lot?
Are you serious carey1110 aren’t you following a tiny bit ? WC ´s jaw dropped to the floor as to the change when he plugged his new powercords without the Vodoo joke adapters.

Quote:

s. I can NOT BELIEVE the way my Mephisto woke up.
One of the few redeeming features of the covid situation is the opportunity to enjoy outdoor dining and outdoor live, unamplified music.  Yesterday I drove through lower Manhattan in the lively Prince St area.  I stopped at a red light and heard some jazz.  Even through my closed windows, after only a few seconds, I could tell it was live.  I opened the window and saw the tenor sax player about 20 feet from me.  The sound was immediate and clear and had more life at 50 dB than from any audio system cranked up.  I didn't analyze the HF, midrange, bass, soundstage or any other audiophile BS.  

The closest analogy I can make for anyone who has little knowledge of live, unamplified sound is furniture.  When I was a child, my family had a nice white painted piece.  But my parents knew it was a fine antique, and they had it restored, stripping away gobs of paint and who knows what other junk that was covered by that white paint.  After that, I couldn't believe the beautiful wood that was revealed.

Nobody would deny that the pure wood that was revealed is more beautiful than the paint job.  In the same way, live unamplified music is more beautiful than audio systems' imitation of it.  Box speaker designs with their artificial resonances added from the box have thicker layers of paint superimposed on the sound of the intrinsic drivers, and boxless designs have the least amount of paint or resonances added.  That's why OB boxless designs are the best approach if the goal is the closest simulation of live, unamplified music.  We'll see how the boxless ML 13A and 20.7 compare.
Techno,
"The problem is that in the military not so long ago, very few were using ear protection when exposed to noise. Today things are supposed to have changed for the better."

Not correct. I was in the AF until 2001, I worked on the flight line on jets. We had to wear hearing protection, if we got caught not wearing it we were written up and usually put on weekend duty for further punishment. 

We had foamies, over the ears ones, and headsets for talking to the aircrew. A lot of times foamies and over the ears. Problem is the pitch or frequency of the engines when they ran them up to taxi, it could be brutal. Don't get me started on the B1's, they were insanely loud shaking the hanger when they took off.

We also had mandatory yearly hearing tests. So yes the AF did and does take hearing protection very seriously.
I must agree that your observations of live music are very well stated. The fact is that live music is far superior to recorded reproduced music. Just the recording process alone degrades things significantly. Not to mention trying to fix that with a system to play the recording.  The best we can hope for is to hear what’s on the recording and maybe embellish it a bit to our liking.  No matter what speaker you you will not get that back it was lost as soon as a microphone was placed between you and the live music. So what it comes down to is trying to recreate the EFFECT  that live music has on us.  So when you hear the live music what is it you like and why. For some it may be weight of it, for other it may be dynamics, or the detail of the reed or wood sound or the metal in the guitar string. What ever is more important to you will determine what you prefer in speakers Wise and supporting gear. Some systems get just one or Two characteristics close while some systems get close on multiple characteristics. If dynamics, bass and weight and less important The you may be happy with quads.  The point is that what ever you personally value in music will be what influences you decisions. No right or wrong choice because it is YOUR choice.  However just about the time I think I have it as good as it gets I hear something new that changes my view. Wish I could hear it all but don’t have the time, money  or energy to do that. However viber6 what speakers you like have peeked my interest since we value some of the same qualities in music. 
Techno-  hearing protection is required in commercial airport as well and it’s still considered the #1 job for hearing loss. The same as the job you were doing in the AF.  I’m sure you suffered some loss. Hearing loss doesn’t always show up at first.  It’s cumulative and may not manifest itself until you get older. If you you worked on the flight line you were at high risk even with hearing protection. How long did you do that job?  However even if you have hearing loss you can probably still tell differences of stereo with in your limited bandwidth. 
Hearing protection was required In the AF  during The early eighties and before.  I’m a retired AF veteran and worked in the hospital where we  kept tabs on you guys as far as your hearIng  goes. 
Yes live music, both amplified and un amplified can have wonderful tone and impact, but on a day to day basis i prefer the talents of Mark Knopfler, Ray Brown and Charley Parker rendered by a decent high-end system, compared to the often talentless stringing and fiddling of amateurs and street musicians. If you land somewhere for a dinner or a wedding with talentless people playing live, it can be downright brutal.
Carey -  Are you addressing Techno or me?

I was in the AF I don't know if Techno was.
Carey,

I worked on the flight line 7 years and yes I have suffered hearing loss even using the hearing protection that I did.

Moderate in one and mild in the other ear. Still I think I hear music alright but who knows, it is when I have conversations with people where I don't always hear things.
WC I went back to the video from the colosseum to the present day Mephisto. I can’t say there has been any improvement along the way. I do feel the Mephisto does not have as much finesse with the music as the Colosseum has. Also previous videos seemed to have better tonal balance and naturalness. The problem in trying to tell the differences is that there have been so many changes so quickly that I can’t tell what change I’m hearing. Even the microphone has been Changed. All these changes make it almost impossible to determine what is what. Maybe a little more stability in the system would make it easier for us to make comparisons. Just within the last couple weeks you have changed power cords, interconnects, speaker cable and speakers. Personally I preferred the D’Agostino and the Colosseum over the Mephisto. While the Mephisto has better dynamics, bass slam And sound stage size It seems less musical and imore aggressive that earlier videos with the other Gryphon amp. Like I said it’s hard to know what is making the difference. We’ll see what the Pandora does when it comes in. My 2 cents worth for what it’s worth.
Of the last two videos you just posted with the Maggie’s, I felt the the second one sounded better. Cleaner Clearer more relaxed sound.