Jazz for aficionados


Jazz for aficionados

I'm going to review records in my collection, and you'll be able to decide if they're worthy of your collection. These records are what I consider "must haves" for any jazz aficionado, and would be found in their collections. I wont review any record that's not on CD, nor will I review any record if the CD is markedly inferior. Fortunately, I only found 1 case where the CD was markedly inferior to the record.

Our first album is "Moanin" by Art Blakey and The Jazz Messengers. We have Lee Morgan , trumpet; Benney Golson, tenor sax; Bobby Timmons, piano; Jymie merrit, bass; Art Blakey, drums.

The title tune "Moanin" is by Bobby Timmons, it conveys the emotion of the title like no other tune I've ever heard, even better than any words could ever convey. This music pictures a person whose down to his last nickel, and all he can do is "moan".

"Along Came Betty" is a tune by Benny Golson, it reminds me of a Betty I once knew. She was gorgeous with a jazzy personality, and she moved smooth and easy, just like this tune. Somebody find me a time machine! Maybe you knew a Betty.

While the rest of the music is just fine, those are my favorite tunes. Why don't you share your, "must have" jazz albums with us.

Enjoy the music.
orpheus10
It's getting to be that time of year!

A CARNEGIE HALL CHRISTMAS CONCERT
Kathleen Battle - Frederica von Stade - Wynton Marsalis - Andre Previn with orch and chorus.

Great Singing by two of the best. Wynton and his band do a great 'Winter Wonderland' and 'Three Kings'. I have it on CD and will now order the DVD. I nust SEE this.

Is there anything Wynton CANNOT do?? His, and his septet's playing is perfect for this performance! The man is at home in any setting! Just like Ray!

The arrangements are just awesome. Battle is awesome on the 'Mary' tunes. At moments, Her voice/music sounds a little 'Porgy & Bess-ish'. von Stade shines on 'Lo, How A Rose E'er blooming'. Effort went into this. And the best were recruited to do it.

The American Boyschoir and the Christmas Concert Chorus provide support.

A Must Have.

Cheers
I finished the last CD today. I think you will enjoy the set. You can have fun trying to 'guess' who is playing what!

I just like the idea of putting on a CD and listening to some of the best Jazz ever recorded. No filler.

Like you, I have most of these, but I like the random aspect of playing the CDs.

And it includes the 'corrected' version of Ellington's Diminuendo and Crescendo in Blue, as performed at New Port.

I am sure you know of Paul Gonsalves' 'interlude' hahahhahahah On the original LP he blew into the wrong mike. After a lot of effort between VoA and CBS, all is now as it should be. His solo was recorded on a Voice of America mike instead of the CBS mike. It is loud and clear now.

I have also discovered that Ornette Coleman is not as bad as I once though. Could I be growing into his stuff?

Check out the tune list of CD-5. That alone is worth the price.

Cheers
Ornette Coleman's stuff on this compilation is good by any standard, but that's the case with many of the original albums; the tunes selected here, were the only good tunes on some of the albums, consequently, if you have these tunes, but don't have the original LP, you're not missing much.

Enjoy the music.
Rok, have you noticed that many of the tunes reviewed on this thread, were also in the compilation?
I never heard of the Ray Draper Quintet before, but I like them. The tuba as a solo instrument is so unique and different from anything in my collection that I got to get it.

Enjoy the music.
*****Rok, have you noticed that many of the tunes reviewed on this thread, were also in the compilation?******

Yep. They cherry picked, but that's just fine with me.
I think you are right about the Ornette Coleman thingy. I never play his CDs, but he sounded good on this set.

Today's Playlist:

Vladimir Horowitz -- THE 1982 ROYAL FESTIVAL HALL RECITAL
music by Chopin,Rachmaninov,Scarlattie,Schumann and Scriabin

Not Jazzz, but I understand Horowitz liked Jazz, so just view this as a plug for a fellow 'aficionado'.

Playing For Change -- SONGS AROUND THE WORLD
Great stuff, if you listen to the CD. The DVD is sort of distracting.

The Langley Schools Music Project -- INNOCENCE & DESPAIR
The GREATEST ROCK CD EVER!! Puts all those over-bearing, over-paid, no talent, Rockers to shame!!

Cheers


The Frogman and The O-10 have just reminded us, In case we had forgotten, why the TUBA and the Sousaphone did not make the trek North out of Nawlins with Jazz.

Thanks Guys

Cheers

Playing for change.....SONGS AROUND THE WORLD, was quite impressive, and I didn't find the DVD at all distracting; as a matter of fact I enjoyed it, that's the only way I'd want the music.

I always enjoy children performing, never missed a concert when my kid was that age; all the other proud parents enjoyed them as much as I did, each parent thought his kid was the star of the show, I couldn't bear to hurt their feelings by telling them my kid was the only true star of the show.

Enjoy the music.

Exactly! As I said, Nawlins!

I have been looking for my CD of Perlman and Zukerman playing Mozart Violin Concertos, with guest soloist, Roland Kirk, but I can't seem to find it.

Cheers

Acman3, I notice Japanese seem to prefer the strictly classic jazz script. I only like Nawlins jazz live, or in a movie, which means I liked this; I've always wanted to dance the second line. I liked the tuba dude, that jam was cookin.

Enjoy the music.
O-10, Yes, if you think about their culture it makes since.

A young player who has been around 10 or so years already. Nice.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMM9wgR0SpA
While thinking of purchasing Winard Harper's album Coexist, I ran across this great label, JLP, Jazz Legacy Products. Great Jazz, Great Price!
****Another Bad Boy*****

Acman3, We are in agreement. In fact he is so BAD, he is just plain awful!!

This not Jazz. This is sound creation!

How many more assaults like this can my beloved music take and survive? Why don't they go pick on Rock?

Cheers
***** Christian Scott ****

Good player in need of a band. This band plays too loud. Over powers the leader / soloist. They also need a different wardrobe!!

Cheers
O-10:

The Playing for Change CD has music not found on the DVD. I find it easier to concentrate without the video. See it once, that's enough.

I was not kidding about the kids and the Rock CD. It is awesome.

Cheers
If it's Jazz and a Tuba, it must be New Orleans Jazz or Brass Band or Sousa or maybe zydeco. There is nothing else that will fit. The Tuba is not a swing/BeBop/hard bop, instrument. Try Olympia or Preservation Hall.

If it's a Tuba in a 'self proclaimed' Jazz group, then they are Noise makers or sound creators.

Next?

Cheers
Bob Stewart is a Professor at Julliard. He played Tuba with Mingus for a while. It may not be to your'e liking, but he is great.

If Christian Scott did what you say, he would sound OLD school. Something NO young man wants to happen. I like his Band. They are influenced as much by today, as the past. Not always a bad thing.

I was in a record store the other day, and some Dylan was playing. I was thinking, this sounds pretty current and enjoying it. When I got to the counter to pay for my records, I asked two twenty-something "KIDS's" what they thought of the music. They looked at each other and one said, "It's OK when I go visit my Grandma" and they died laughing. Painful :^)

Keep enjoying what you like anyway, they will be old someday, and be stuck with Lady GAGA.

Acman3, while I liked each individual musician ( I listened to the complete set), I didn't care for the music; maybe I've gotten too old for new music. I'd like the Frogman's take on it.

Enjoy the music.
****Bob Stewart is a Professor at Julliard. He played Tuba with Mingus for a while. It may not be to your'e liking, but he is great.****

I did not question his musical ability. He knows his way around the Tuba, and if he teaches at Julliard, well, what else is there to say?

My point is this. The Tuba is just not a 'Jazz' instrument. Sure, some New Orleans groups and the brass bands use them, but that's about it. Anything else is a gimmick.

And I would bet there is not a musical instrument on planet earth that has not been a part of at least one Mingus recording date. I am sure I have heard Tuba on a Mingus record.

How many Saxophone players do you know with the ambition to play with a Classical Symphony Orchestra? Same problem that Jazz Tuba players have.

Even I find Dylan dated. Once the war in Viet Nam ended and the Civil rights violence subsided, he was finished. He was a niche performer. Loved his stuff back in the day. His was the first LP I ever purchased. Along with Baez and Saint-Marie.

And Jazz, like all great music, is not subject to a 'listen to by' date. It does not get old. I have an entire rack of Classical CDs. The music on these CDs was composed by people long dead. It ain't old.

I listened to 'Satch Plays Fats' today. WOW! Wanna hear Jazz trumpet? Listen to Pops. Just as current as when Waller wrote it.

Good one, about lady Gaga! Serves them right! hahahhah

Cheers
"...You can't play anything on the horn that Louis hasn't already played...even modern."
-- Miles Davis

Maybe a little bit of an exaggeration; but, considering the source, it's quite a compliment.
One of the most beautiful yet sad and haunting jazz compositions that I have ever heard. This was written by Billy Strayhorn for Ellington's band and was his last composition. He was dying from cancer and finished it while in the hospital. Johnny Hodges is simply incredible on this.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ckls62nZHw
Blood Count:
One of the best things about this thread, is being introduced to music you don't have. The absolute best thing, is being reminded of great music you already own.
Will play it today. I will enjoy it much more now that I know the HISTORY behind it.

Good Call.

Cheers

Hank Crawford is a tenor sax man you can instantly recognize, that's because his sound is so uniquely different from all the other tenor sax men; they also like his unique and pleasing sound. The first time I heard him, thoughts of Ray Charles came to mind, and I didn't know why; he was Ray Charles musical director from 1959 until 1963.

"Angel Eyes" has been one of my favorite tunes for ages, but when I heard Hank's version, I realized this was the first time I'd heard Angel Eyes. It seems to have a deep melancholy sadness, and longing for the lost love of "Angel Eyes"; this song has come to life in the guise of a captivating women with angel eyes whose spell can not be broken, and it leaves all her lovers to long for the hypnotic gaze of her very special "angel eyes".

His versions of other standards have a uniqueness I can't quite define; consequently I'm left with a new word, "Crawfordesque", there is no other way to describe the sound he gives to standards.

I have here a package of my favorite tunes by Hank that I found on "you tube"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHdrtdqKkeM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dMcpgEt0AA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSHMRyY5Drk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0Cx8Tk4Miw

Enjoy the music.
As far as Jazz & tuba's go, IMO it begins and ends with the great Howard Johnson's band and debut recording; 'Gravity'. Piano, bass, & drums joined by 5-7 tubas. You'd be sorely mistaken by pegging this as a 'novelty' record. It's a beautiful, great Jazz record, you oughtta check it out!
Jazz Tuba in it's natural enviroment. Rebirth Brass Band thingy might be a little raw for you 'up-North' sophisticates :)

Cheers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lmx3rlucDQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNSFZWMnomM
well you shouldn't have got me started!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNSFZWMnomM

cheers
"Blood Count" was a featured piece for Stan Getz for decades. As much as I love Johnny Hodges, it's Getz who embodies the song. There are numerous YouTubes and recorded version. Here's some interesting commentary about Getz and the song.

On a different topic, check out the story and video of Sarah Vaughan.

"Blood Count" was as you described it. Johnny Hodges was "Mr. Alto Sax" before Bird. This music prompted me to go through the vaults; I found a treasure of Duke Ellington, Billy Strayhorn, Johnny Hodges and others, for my listening pleasure, that was quite rewarding.

This is music I heard as a child, when such things as who was making the music were irrelevant. Since I associate music with what I was doing when I heard it, childhood memories flashed across my mind like a slide show; in regard to the music, I only recall a joyous feeling and liking it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIkekMoEQY4&list=PL927020F299B15A86

Enjoy the music.
Re Getz and Blood Count: I love the way Getz plays that tune; I can't think of anything that Getz did that I didn't like.

****As much as I love Johnny Hodges, it's Getz who embodies the song****

Interesting choice of words about a song written by a man who is about to leave his body. I agree that Getz's versions are great and there is no point debating who plays the song better. However, to my way of thinking, "Blood Count" is about the composition, orchestration and all, and not just the "song". It was the last statement by a brilliant composer/orchestrator intended to be played by a group of musicians that he knew exactly how each would sound on each individual part; they were his musical palette. No piano/bass/drums rhythm section can capture the dark and funereal (literally) sonorities of Ellington's brass and reeds; his chord voicings are amazing. The orchestration as a whole is a dialogue between the soloist (Hodges) and the band. Great stuff.

onhwy61, although it's possible that Getz version sounded better, there's no way he could embody the song better than Johnny Hodges. If that sounds like a contradiction, I leave it to Frogman's post for elaboration.

Enjoy the music.

onhwy61, although it's possible that Getz version sounded better, there's no way he could embody the song better than Johnny Hodges. If that sounds like a contradiction, I leave it to Frogmans post for elaboration.

Enjoy the music.

Eddie Harris, "A Child Is Born", this is one beautiful tune. That reverberation makes the sound come from far away, and it just knocks me out. I had "reverb" in a 66 Electra 225 that made all the music sound this way; it was like riding in a cave.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_N1mPWwxgRI

Enjoy the music.
*******As much as I love Johnny Hodges, it's Getz who embodies the song. *********

Without doubt, The most outrageous statement ever made on this thread.

I thank the OP, O-10, and The Frogman, for calling him on it.

All opinions do not deserve respect. This is one!

Cheers
Everybody has an opinion and I have stated mine. I have nothing but respect for anyone who disagrees with me. Well, maybe not everyone.

Not to change anyone's opinion, but here's another critic who agrees with me.

Onhwy61, you're only making your situation worse, and I'm not going to try and explain how or why; the Frogman seems to be best with words, I'll leave it to him.

Bobby Hutcherson is an artist I don't think we touched on. In regard to his recognition as a top vibraphonist, his biggest problem has been "Milt Jackson". While many others compare everyone to the "jazz giants", I listen long and deep to each individual artist's contribution to jazz. In the case of Bobby, I give you "Delilah".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amgLychKCMY

That was most certainly a treat for my ears.

Enjoy the music.
Nothing in Jazz beats Ellington at his best over the years, IMHO. The amount of talent that came under his wings as well is hard to fathom!

Onhwy61

"The most beautiful yet sad and haunting jazz compositions that I have ever heard. This was written by Billy Strayhorn for Ellington's band and was his last composition. He was dying from cancer and finished it while in the hospital. Johnny Hodges is simply incredible on this."

This was written by Billy Strayhorn for Ellington's band while he was dying of cancer. It's totally 100% impossible for anyone other than Johnny Hodges to embody the essence of what Billy Strayhorn has written better than, "Johnny Hodges".

The way Billy Strayhorn, Duke Ellington, and Johnny Hodges went together, your statement in regard to "opinion" is almost sacrilegious. I gave you the benefit of the doubt when I stated it was possible that Getz version sounded better.

Opinion means nothing in regard to this, and Ted Gioia's review was no less irreverent than your statement.

Case closed.
Consistent with the power of great music, the subject of "Blood Count" has elicited some very strong feelings. I don't think I can add anything to what I have already stated concerning my reasons for considering the original version to be the best other than to encourage all to consider that context (historical or otherwise) is very important when "judging" any art. I invite and encourage Onhwy61 to tell us why he considers Getz's version to be superior. Not to take him to task, but simply as an attempt take this discussion beyond simple statements of "I like this better", and learn what exactly he means by stating that Getz "embodies" the tune. I realize that putting feelings about a performance, and art in general, is not an easy task. But, surely, some commentary should be possible; if only something as simple as "I prefer the sound of the tenor saxophone", but hopefully something beyond that.

Having said all that, and since Gioia's review was cited as support of Onhwy's particular viewpoint (or, at least, how his comment was interpreted), a couple of observations about the review:

Interestingly, Gioia never says that Getz's version is superior at all. He never says anything about Getz playing it better than Hodges nor that Getz's quartet renditions are better than Ellington's. Notice that I said "his quartet's rendition's"; this goes back to my previous comments about musical context and the need to look at the entire composition/orchestration, not simply the melody. What he actually does say is "Getz owned this song". What does he mean by this? I doubt Gioia is lurking on Agon in order to tell us, but I think we have some important clues. Again, context; historical context:

Strayhorn wrote it, Ellington/Hodges performed it and recorded it (once). After Strayhorn's passing (and adding poignancy to the whole matter) Ellington never played it again out of respect for Strayhorn. Many years later, Getz makes the composition a staple of his repertory and plays and records it beautifully; and, by all accounts, probably much more frequently than any other artist. THAT is what I believe Gioia meant by "Getz owned this song". Not, that he played it better than Hodges did. I believe Gioia (or any credible jazz writer) knows better than to say something like that, while fully understanding the reverence held for Ellington, Strayhorn, Hodges, and the circumstances around that composition.

Speaking of reverence and the other "review" that is cited (Scott Albin). First of all, I find it conspicuous that he uses the same language that the far more credible writer (Gioia) used; that Getz "owned" the tune "FROM THAT POINT ON" (1982). I would not argue that point. However, he also said that Getz "outdid Hodges". While I definitely don't agree with that assertion, I think that he, also, misses the point about needing to consider the entire composition and not just the tune. Now, the part about reverence, and I admit that any conclusion about this is conjecture on my part, but it decreases this particular writer's credibility in my book:

I find highly suspect this writer's assertion that Getz had never heard the Ellington/Hodges recording of "Blood Count" prior to recording it fifteen years after Ellington recorded it. First of all, Getz had a great fondness for Strayhorn tunes; to the extent that he recorded an entire album of the music of Strayhorn, as well as performing many of the compositions live on a regular basis. A great jazz player with a fondness for a particular composer would be familiar with just about all of that composer's work. Additionally, given the prominence of Ellington, Strayhorn, Hodges and the circumstances around the composition, the story is the kind of thing that travels like wild fire within the jazz community. It is difficult to believe that Getz had never heard it. Obviously conjecture on my part, but I think it points to the use of hyperbole by that particular writer.

Not that Ohnwy61 needs anyone's opinion to support his own; he doesn't. But, personally, I would appreciate knowing why he has it.
Words matter.

"Embodies" was a bad choice of words. Change that, and I have no problem with anything else he wishes to say.

But, you cannot say a player can 'embody' a tune written by a great composer, on his death bed, and written for players of whom he had a very intimate knowledge as people and players.

He knew who would play his work. You can't get around that. He wrote many tunes for the Ellington Band.

Now if you like Getz, fine! Liking Getz' version is a valid 'OPINION'. Just leave the 'embodied' thing out of it.

And lastly, this place is more of a conversation, than the usual "audiophile Thread". NOTHING here has to be better, or worst, than anything else. It's all good.

Now as the OP said, lets consider the CASE CLOSED, lest we become like the rest of Audiogon.

Cheers
The Frogman's post was as eloquent, logical and well reasoned as always.

If this was Physics, we would say it was 'beautiful'.

Lets get back to important stuff! I have a 'review' coming up! :) Calm down! I'll post it soon. You people never get enough!!

Cheers