Interconnects and non-believers

unreceivedogma"I’m probably old enough to be your granddaddy."

If that were true you’d be dead I think you are in second or third grade "grammar school" or maybe fourth but that’s about it based on what you say here but you sure are one of the local experts here about dogma you are all about faith, belief, and fervor over what you believe to be true.

I just put in some Mogami 2549 rca's from my cdp to my SEP amp. I picked them up for $20, figuring it's always nice to have some cables lying around. I'm going to buy some more, they sound better than the BJ LC1's I was using. Mainly they have more presence up top, which also gives the illusion of soundstage a boost. Nice, since the EL34's roll off a bit up there. You don't always have to spend $$$ to find an improvement in cabling.

The operative words, fairly presented by the OP are "Non-Believers" .

To the poster who derided the scientists who make judgments  ".....without considering  observable phenomena" I suggest that, in the difference of cable issue there ARE not (yet) observable phenomenon in the non-biased reproducible sense respected by scientists. 
So belief system, sure, no sense in arguing. Enjoy your religion, be it conventional, alternative, new age whatever, enjoy your cables. But do not conflate with science and engineering.
And BTW lots of "scientists and engineers" pray at least occasionally, self included. Agree life is not ALL science!
Elizabeth, I truly could not tell if your comments on HIV and health were parody/satire or genuine.

playmore,

I agree that the debates that are often depicted as "objectivists vs subjectivists" have the character of a religious vs non-believer debate, and they are on the continuum of the debate between religion and science.