If you were to design a tone arm, what would it look like and feature?


There are a good number of different tonearm designs currently on the market. Some feature a uni-pivot, some gimbal bearings, some are air bearing designs, others use a knife edge...etc. We also have multi adjustability ( SRA, Azimuth weight, etc) and size--9 inch 10inch..twelve inch. Then we have the SAT tonearms that also feature carbon fibre etc., 
If money was no real object, what is your idea of the 'ideal tonearm' that you would design...and why?
128x128daveyf
jagjag - An auto arm lifter (gentle) at the end of a record that does not thump the arm

My turntable sits within armreach of the main listening chair. The stylus never makes it past the first runout groove and is lifted. But if at the other side of the room......

@daveyf
I’d like to see an "affordable" tonearm that is able to do VTA on the FLY while the record plays ( the only way to do it so you can hear it).......and not lose its settings (VTF)

I believe of all the tonearms mentioned on this thread so far only one has this capability, and it is not the expensive VTA with remote control one that Larry mentioned. 8^0

Atmasphere ^^^ that is SOTA in my book. VTA on the FLY and not lose settings. A designer needs to think that VTF is important enough to make a design that gets over physics.

An uninterrupted run of internal wire from the cartridge tags to the RCA plugs.

No matter the design, it would have a removable head shell. Many companies now have that type as standard on their most expensive models.  There is not terchnical reason for not designing the arm with one, but old traditions die hard.

Every connection in a wire creates eddy currents and micro-arcing at the connection interface. This distortion is particularly harmful in a tone arm, owing to the fact the signal from the cartridge is the most highly amplified in all of audio. 
 

The same thing happens with physical vibration. Waves traveling up from the cartridge, instead of being uniformly and smoothly dissipated along the arm wand and into the body and base, are reflected back at the head shell/arm tube interface. Which is aggravated by the need for a fastening mechanism.

So it turns out there are a great many technical reasons why detachable headshells (and arm wands) are a bad idea. 
Unless of course you value being able to readily swap cartridges enough to make it worth the sonic sacrifice. In that case you really should just use a two or 3 arm table. But there’s always people who want to believe in the free lunch, a much more likely explanation as to why we see this obviously inferior design even on high end arms.

The arm's rigidity, mass, bearing & damping all play a role in extracting your cartridges peak performance. The tonearm has to support the cartridge in its correct position over the entire record, while allowing it to move inward to the centre of the record and navigate any vinyl surface imperfections.