By acoustic and psycho-acoustic definition, we cannot compared home listening conditions with studio conditions or great concert Hall conditions...😊
It is like saying that a vehicle potential destination reach and speed and confort disposition make a Saturn Rocket better than a Ferrari and a Concord plane better than a Ferrari too but less good than the rocket...
And the ONLY interesting factor for most of us anyway , out of acoustic knowledge and experience that matter the most is the ratio S.Q. optimal level/ lowest price ratio...
I am happy now acoustically with a ridiculously low cost system well embedded... I listen music i am not moved by the look of a system or his price tag not even by his performance passed a minimal acoustic quality threshold... I live for music not for sound, and my budget is very constrained... my hobby was acoustic for years... but now i am in music because i succeeded with a peanuts budget to go and reach this minimal acoustic threshold of satisfaction defined with each acoustic experienced factors at the right place...
Less is better...Especially if it comes from your creative work with ANY system at ANY price in their three working embeddings dimensions ... I am proud of my work not of the price tag by itself or branded name alone...
Anybody with a wallet can buy the best in the world... Making the best with the less is more interesting on all counts for me... 😊
My hobby is now music...My acoustic basic job for many years is done and learned ...
"If someone is serious about sound " he buy books about acoustics and psycho-acoustics , not plug and play costly components...
What is the use to own the components you just describe if someone dont know how to control crosstalk in his system or create the optimal conditions for experiencing the best ASW/LV ratio ?
Sorry but i think you are not serious at all about sound... 😉😁😊