Hello. I’m about six months into a one year subscription with Qobuz.
Before I purchased the platform I did a side by side comparison with Tidal - I had a month remaining on Tidal at the time so I figured it was as good a time as any to see which one was better.
Mind you, the comparisons were done with identical tracks on either platform, and played through the woefully inadequate speakers on my Mac desktop. Not a very “audiophile” thing to do admittedly, but as this comparison was conducted near-field i felt it would, for me at least, hold water.
To my humble ears Qobuz was better. Not by much, but I believe I heard more depth and resolution in the tracks than I did with Tidal. For the record I have to state that I am not necessarily a fan of streaming or downloading, but I do have to recognize that things are what they are currently, as well as for the foreseeable future.
I’m a sublime subscriber, as well. So far as purchasing music as a sublime subscriber it is far less expensive than HD Tracks - and HD Tracks doesn’t have the depth that Qobuz has. I haven’t encountered any quality/sonic issues with purchases or streaming, and the only critique of the platform is that when playing my playlists there almost always is a dropout at the beginning of tracks. It’s a second or so, but it can become annoying quickly when it happens frequently.
What I dig mostly about Qobuz is the ability to dive into record labels. I’ve discovered a lot of new artists doing that.
Overall I don’t think there are enough faults in either platform to authentically claim one is remarkably superior to the other. In fact, as my subscription to Qobuz nears its end I will shop around to secure the least expensive subscription platform.
I have a modestly good two channel setup in my living room: Belles 150A integrated hybrid amplifier, Musical Fidelity CD player, a Bluesound Node 2, Jolida FX-10 glass tube DAC, and a pair of Thiel CS 2.4 loudspeakers.
Great question. Hope more folks chime in.