How competitive are you with your system?

I don't see how any reasonable evaluation via youtube is possible.  First, it takes a master recording engineer to do a recording properly and good microphones cost many thousands of dollars each, and many are needed so that the right microphone for the job can be selected.  Even with all of that, how will one know that the recording is faithful to the original without playing it back on a system which has its own sound; the only way to sort of close the loop is to hear the system in its original venue and hear the recorded playback immediately on multiple systems to confirm that the recording is reasonably faithful.  And even if you have that, the youtube watcher has a completely different system coloring the results such that any comparison is hopelessly flawed.  The only way to compare systems is to hear them in person, and the result is a purely individual, subjective assessment, not all that useful unless there was a big panel of judges that makes it sort of like a baking contest--the "winner" is a rough consensus choice.

Any "contest" comparing systems is NOT about the sound because there is never a valid sonic comparison.  It is about something else--how nice something looks, how much was spent or how little was spent, or how may pieces made the Stereophile category A list, etc.  

@cleeds

That’s because you don’t know how to use it.

It will tell you if a system has a smooth frequency response in the room and if there are peaks and nodes (assuming a good recording).

Also, to do this, you need to go back and find the original direct transfer and that is what you are comparing the system too.

You are not listening to "what it sounds like" but rather "how close does it sound to the direct transfer" when listening on your quality monitoring system.

If you do comparisons in this manner, you will hear what the room sounds like as well as deviations in the system.

Sure, you loose imaging, soundstage, and the like, but you can tell trash from treasure.

I don’t care what others think of mine. There’s  likes are no business of mine. 

I'm kind of anti-competitive. 

I see speakers or gear on Stereophile and think "Wow, I've got a better sounding system than that and I only paid 10% of the cost!" 

My take is that I think it’s almost impossible not to wonder how your system compares to others’.  I believe it’s human nature. 

Generally speaking, as a principle I avoid comparing to others like the plague.  
When one compares, the creative mind can always find examples of others better than you AND examples of others worst than you.  The former can lead to feelings of envy/resentment, while the later can lead to feelings/attitude of superiority/pridefulness - both to be avoided.

In high-end audio, we strive to build our systems to be subjectively sonically pleasing, realizing that it’s not the same as a live event (reality), but can get very close at times depending on equipment and subject preferences.

@rvpiano - normally, after significant investment in time, resources, and effort, we are supposed to have increasing satisfaction with our systems as we raise subjective sonics in our system building.  I highly suspect it’s not a “comparison” issue with you, but rather a dissatisfaction/disappointment with the Sonics of your current system - if you loved your Sonics, you wouldn’t be looking elsewhere.  If you are disappointed that it doesn’t sound like reality/live music, then you have an unrealistic comparison as audio chains are at best a facsimile of reality, and the quality of recordings are all over the map.