The position seems strange, but it is the result of a year of micro-movements of the speakers. If I increase the distance between them you can hear the music coming from one speaker, whereas this way there is more perspective fusion.
In the past I also had a MiniDSP, but then when I did the acoustic analysis it turned out that the Indra's performance is very linear and there are no holes or emphasis, so I removed the MiniDSP...
DeVore O/93 or PureAudioProject Duet15 for a First Watt SIT-3?
Hi
What do you think would be better for a warm organic late night listening (classic music, opera and jazz)?
Stereophile reviewed the O/93 as a perfect pairing with SIT-3 (even is SIT-3 prefers low impedance speakers).
Duet15 seems to me more sensible (97db vs 93db) (and Steve Guttenberg think are top).
My current speakers are 4ohms / 87db Avalon Indra, absolute fantastic at their 80db listening kingdom.
Thanks
- ...
- 67 posts total
I heard the DeVore 0/96 speakers driven by an 8W 300B amp sounding great. I spent most of my time at the audio show listening to these finding them fun and entertaining. Certainly these can't be accused of 'got completely wrong' Someone here with an agenda? Your room appears to need some acoustic treatment. |
Can we maybe just say we all like what we like? Some folks like narrow baffle speakers, some like wide and some like open baffles? It’s preference and not a contest folks! And @ulul I find sensitive speakers in general to be good for lower level listening. I run Audio Note AN-J’s in an admittedly small room and rarely get above 70dbs using 3.5 watt 2a3 monoblocks. I’ve heard and liked DeVore 0/96s in a friends system and their reference system at CAF. I’ve only heard PAP speakers at CAF and didn’t love them but take that with a grain of salt audio shows being what they are. |
One of the S'Phile reviewers recently said something worthy of quoting-"If you have to play only great recordings for your system to sound great, it's time to change your system" (or something very close). While I am glad to see you now say that these are your opinions and not fact, your initial post and even the bold-faced sentence come across as statements of fact.
You touched, purposefully or unwittingly, on a subject of much legitimate debate. Classical music fans love to argue that an optimum loudspeaker should be capable of recreating the sound they hear in their favorite row and seat in their favorite music hall but in the real world no transducer or speaker system known to mankind can do that and the very "model/conceit" goes flying out the window when the music was created and preserved for future playback in a studio. And then comes the unfortunate truth that speakers with perfectly flat and extended frequency response and dispersion characteristics can (and often do) sound boring. You are giving up your spare time to relax and enjoy, not examine and study as if in a laboratory hunched down over a microscope. Look at it this way-why do headphones which are capable of perfectly flat frequency response, no room interaction, and no cross-overs still implement some variation of the Harmon Curve? The answer, in case you don't know, is that they better enable the BRAIN to perceive a recreation of the real event and they sound better. And finally comes the reality (my version of reality?) that every audio system is an amalgamation of compromises from source to transducers. My point is simple; lighten up, relax, and have fun. Does your system make you wish you were young again and wailing on the guitar in front of a crowd? Does it make you want to get up and dance? The O/96's do that, better than my O/93's. I am currently strongly considering a pair of Volti Rival SE's. Talk about having fun, it is Greg Roberts' motto! |
- 67 posts total