Cryogenically treated cables


There are more and more cable manufactures treating there cables now. Some offer this service for a fair price.
I was thinking of getting all my IC, Speaker and PC treated along with the Power condintioner.
Can anyone give me a before and after sonic description of the cryogenically process.
Steve
evo845
+1 delkal,

Many do. It's an easy path to a higher charge and as illustrated, with obvious marks why not?  I believe some specifically do not as they recognize materials in the construction may not be designed for those temps.  
audiozenology
Cryogenic materials treatment involves little shock. You don’t dump it in liquid. It is a vapour exposure.

It is not going to have a "sound". Copper conductivity is barely impacted and even if you caused some damage to the dielectrics, it would make 0 difference at audio frequencies. I would bet more cable to cable variation than cable to cryoed same cable change.


>>>>>You say Hello, I say Goodbye! Take copious notes. 
Most of them do cryo their cables. Shhhh, don’t tell anybody. The rest must not have gotten the memo. Who knows?
If cryo treatment always improve the sound why don’t ALL high end manufacturers cryo their cables by default? Treating cables in bulk, cryo treatment would probably only add $10-20 per cable. There would be plenty of profit left with their $500-1000+ wire. Why are they selling uber-expensive cables that are not the best they can make and could be improved for $20?
Cryogenic materials treatment involves little shock. You don't dump it in liquid. It is a vapour exposure.


It is not going to have a "sound". Copper conductivity is barely impacted and even if you caused some damage to the dielectrics, it would make 0 difference at audio frequencies. I would bet more cable to cable variation than cable to cryoed same cable change.
Hi, Michael, I’m giving you the benefit of twenty years of cryo experience. I was one of the early pioneers. Are you giving me a little jab 🥊 for my Ultra low mass portable system? Isn’t that a conflict of interest? 😀 Is my system even lower mass than the Michael Green standard? Total SONY Walkman/ Sony headphone system mass 1.5 lbs. Jealous? 

Hi Geoff

Did you ever setup a stereo in your home or are you still giving results based on your Sony Walkman?

The last several times you and I have been giving thoughts on the same threads you didn't have an in-room stereo. Let me know if you ever do.

Michael

I find cryo generally provides more information, not less. Cryo improves the performance of all materials. There is no reason I can think of why cryo would degrade the sound of anything, with certain caveats. There is a waiting period for cryo, maybe several days, to let the CDs or LPs or tubes or whatever recover from thermal shock of cryo. During that time the sound can be quite bad sometimes. Also, avoid cryo that involves immersion in liquid nitrogen. 

You can get quite good results using the home freezer, and you don’t have to wait a week or two to get your stuff back from the cryo lab.

I'm not a fan of the cryo sound. Too many things come up missing in the info for me.

Michael

Well this didn’t age well ...
clearthink

1,003 posts01-19-2017
3:12pm

Again,with the kind permission of Bo, the group and the moderators kindly please allow me to expand a bit on TruFi, what it means for the world of music reproduction systems and how it will change the industry.

Kindly please remember that I am not not a spokesman for TruFi. I am a client of Bo’s and it has been proven to me and it has been proven to everyone that the world of music reproduction systems is shifting from one of widdley-tiddley voodoo to TruFi, which is recognized by all who hear it.

Bo does shootouts. Using properties identified under TruFi and measurement techniques, Bo can demonstrate a diversity in sound that no one else can deliver. He can do this because he alone has developed TruFi, the only means so far developed to allow music reproduction systems to show the true diversity of sound that only TruFi can deliver, so far.

Until now music reproduction systems have been built using information from paid for advertising and "reviews" and trial and error approach. This is why all music reproduction systems other than TruFi are 1D or 2D while TruFi systems are 3D. This has been proven many many times, so there’s no need to debate that here.

As I said earlier but some seem to have not understood Bo is an innovator, trailblazer, and a visionary. As such of course he is a threat to the current establishment of hi-fi and music reproduction systems. These people need to defend their businesses and hi-fi religion so they do that here! Some have accused Bo of using this group for advertising but the opposite is the truth. It is Bo’s attackers who use this group to promote their own self interests above those of the true lover of music, which is all about emotion, and the music reproduction systems we use to reproduce it.

In the end, emotion is the only key to success in audio.
Amen.

Only a tiny fraction of systems emote. Sadly, far too many rumble, rattle, fart, bloat, tizz and screech preventing any connection with the music.
We are now discussing to do presentations with Conservatory students. Manufacturers with who we do business are interested in it. This is the best and only way to show and teach people how voices and instruments sound and how big they are in space. 

The idea is to start with a voice or a person who plays an instrument. After this, we want to let people hear how a Tru-Fi system plays the same kind instrument.

In the end, emotion is the only key to success in audio. This is why we want to show people how human emotion works regarding music. So it makes sense to use real voices and instruments for that.
I sold and tested many different brands in cables in over 20 years of time. When you compare and test cables you often can hear that a manufacturer puts the focus on a certain frequency range. 

This makes people often think for example that the low frequencies increased in power and control. But they forget that these choices often create other limitations. In other aspects of sound.

I will not use names anymore. Often 'emphasis' cables are not able to create a huge level in 3D. And they often can also not reveal diversity in height like brands who are what we call; more linear. This means that all frequencies are being equally carried out.  

ieales
"
Anyone with an LCR bridge can measure cable parameters, enter them in a calculator along with the electronics I/O / speaker parameters and calculate the values"

Yes this should not be too difficult for anyone with basic, fundamental, rudimentary technical skills and that is why it puzzles my that bo1972 hasn't shared such details to accompany his claim except it doesn't really surprise me because bo1972's understandings are much more limited than he is ever willing to admit, acknowledge or accept.
Anyone with an LCR bridge can measure cable parameters, enter them in a calculator along with the electronics I/O / speaker parameters and calculate the values.

If manufacturers were more honest, they would include LCR values in their 'specs' instead of fuzzy headed audiophile nonsense.

See http://ielogical.com/Audio/CableSnakeOil.php

bo1972
"
Most cables in audio are what we call; emphasis cables. That means that those who created them put the focus on certain frequency response. "

That is quite a claim, assertion, and pronouncement please provide data on the FR measurements you have done on audio cables that confirm you're claim or are you saying this is just a belief that you have but haven't conducted the tests necessary to confirm it which is fine if that is the case. 
Can I sell you some Nitro-Gin for your tires?  If that is not good enough, we could use hydrogen.  It is great on big bumps. 

hemigreg
Yes copper purity is paramount to make a few microohms decrease-but you can get 1000 fold improvement by upping gauge one size. even the cheap cca cable will show no active degretation if SIZED and terminated according to NIST and JAN spec. there are many papers and govt research on this. so now theri decision is to Not use cryo conductors in and space program,neclear reactor,wepons system,life support equipt.
so why would any "sound equipt" benefit unless things are under spect to start with.

>>>Audiophiles don’t really care very much what the Government does, or NASA or the military or life support. We do whatever we like. We are the Clash! 🤗 Besides NASA employs cryogenics routinely for space missions, liquid nitrogen and BEYOND. Anyone interested in higher performance materials would use cryogenic treatment.

We ain’t gonna be treated like trash
We got one thing
We are the Clash
What?
We are the Clash
It’s like a patch
You can strike that match!
yes copper purity is paramount to make a few microohms decrease-but you can get 1000 fold improvement by upping gauge one size.  even the cheap cca cable will show no active degretation if SIZED and terminated according to NIST and JAN spec. there are many papers and govt research on this. so now theri decision is to Not use cryo conductors in and space program,neclear reactor,wepons system,life support equipt.
so why would any "sound equipt" benefit unless things are under spect to start with.
Nothin’ could be weirder than to see some geezer puttin’ LPs in his freezer. 
Ain’t nothin wrong with that action! Your freezer is effective, inexpensive, controllable and a whole lot quicker that sending stuff off to the cryo lab and waiting to get it back, which can take up to two weeks. 🔄 Another big plus ➕ is there’s no thermal shock involved with the home freezer. Nothin says lovin’ like something from the freezer! 🥶 There is always something in my freezer, CDs 💿 mostly, but also cassettes, cables, portable CD players, headphones 🎧 , etc.
Most people forget.......how to refer. When you don't understand sound, you can not understand audio. Most cables in audio are what we call; emphasis cables. That means that those who created them put the focus on certain frequency response. But....a cable needs to be as linear as possible 

What all emphasis cables have in common is the fact that they all can not reveal all aspects of sound. And this can easily be proven by sound and stage. Even many fuses are emphasis fuses. And again the same limitations will occur as what emphasis cables show by sound and stage.

It is very easy to change sound and even stage by adding or changing a part of an audio system. But......the question is does this changement create an improvement. So you need to be able to reveal and observe all aspects of sound within 1 tenth of a second. As your system needs to be able to reveal all those aspects of sound.

It is the complexity of sound that makes audio so difficult to understand and adjust. But you need to understand all the different aspects which influence sound and stage. As you need to understand in detail what sound is and on which properties it is being founded.

So even before you can judge one part of what you change in your system. You need to describe the full DNA (all aspects it owns and how these different aspects are being carried out) of each part in your system. After that, you need to describe in full detail the influence of the acoustic, electro-smog, magnetism and high-frequency noise on your sound and stage of your system. And it needs to be done independently.

Without this audio is 100% pure gambling. 
In space, nobody cares about cables from refrigerator.👨‍🚀

"In space no one can eat ice cream, glubby. 👨‍🚀"

Predictable as usual, you may not be correct.

"https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-astronauts-will-get-some-real-ice-cream-180964558/

As always, use this piece of knowledge during your next attempt to be witty and funny or at some cocktail party. You know, things insiders from NASA like to talk about.
In space no one can eat ice cream, glubby. 👨‍🚀

For glubby twenty years was the time he spent in high school. Comedy is subjective, I know.
Twenty years of schoolin’
And they put you on the day shift
That is some shortcut school. When you put more years into school, you can work day and night.
"I wish I could tell you, gentle readers, how many things improve the sound after they’re cryo’d."
I will help you.

It is only one. Ice-cream. And that one is not about sound but overall.
Geez, even a tiny little fuse sounds better after cryo. Cut me some slack, Jack! We don’t need a doctorate dissertation to tell us cryo is good for any type of wire. Cryo makes things perform better. I wish I could tell you, gentle readers, how many things improve the sound after they’re cryo’d. Unfortunately, it gets into areas I fear are beyond scope and might be a little bit too much for the naive and those just starting out. 😳 I certainly don’t wish to frighten or snow anyone. None of this stuff is in books. Hel-loo! That’s why the -10 F home freezer is way more mysterious than - 300 cryogenics.

Don’t steal, don’t lift
Twenty years of schoolin’
And they put you on the day shift
Look out kid
They keep it all hid
Better jump down a manhole
Light yourself a candle
Don’t wear sandals
Try to avoid the scandals
Don’t want to be a bum
You better chew gum
The pump don’t work
’Cause the vandals took the handles
atdavid, eeyeah, my post was for those who were addressing the OP in one manner or the other. Perhaps you should read it again to better understand it. And feel free to call yourself an idiot anytime. No argument from me.
There have been papers, by real scientist (no for real), that have shown a several percent increase in conductivity in copper conductivity at room temperature after cryogenic treatment. What I don't remember (was a while ago), was what the initial purity of the copper was. I would not be surprised if the results are dependent on copper purity, hence if you are starting pure, there may be virtually no change. No indication this had any affect at all on high frequency, or any other useful property.


glupson2,772 posts11-06-2019 9:38pm
"...the electrical activity in copper when brought back to room temp will not be any better than with no treatment."
Finally! Thank you!

I have been trying to gently imply that warming it up may negate any possible benefit from cooling but to no avail.

As the hillbilly said to the city slicker in Deliverance, you don’t know nothin. I don’t mean to pry but is your brain really the size of a pea?
"Are all this cable companies that cryo their cables wasting their time and everybody else’s?"
They are spending their time wisely and in a lucrative way. Question of ethics may remain, though.

"Was NASA duped, too?"
Yes, big time, They hired geoffkait.
"...the electrical activity in copper when brought back to room temp will not be any better than with no treatment."
Finally! Thank you!

I have been trying to gently imply that warming it up may negate any possible benefit from cooling but to no avail.

hemigreg
The electrical activity in copper when brought back to room temp will not be any better than with no treatment. ive done cross sections of copper/gold/silver/plat/irridium/plutonium/thorium/ etc in research for conductivity and transmission speed of the electron/hole pairs for semiconductor chip upgrades cause the time a Ghz signal enters a pc board to the time it hits the transistor junction in the processer does make a lag in the output. but that is only signifient in the GHZ freq range. totally silly effect in the khz and down. even high freq MRI magnets with cryo cooled power supplys are for the reason of lower resistance and no infulence in the resultant mri results- so if you think itsounds different its your $$ to waste. ive done it to liquid HE,H.O2, and colder.you may likely suffer more damage due to slip face kinda like embritlement in the lattice no matter how slow warmed up, the inital cold shock will offset the lattice a few minutes/deg. upsetting the outer 3-4 electrons orbit. yea.
otherwise copper is ultra stabil electrically and mechanically. cryo for fe based elements is a totally different reason.

>>>>Gee, that’s too bad. Must be mass hysteria or hypnosis. How else to explain all the many hundreds of thousands of cryod cables and fuses and vacuum tubes sold? Are all these cable companies that cryo their cables wasting their time and everybody else’s? Was NASA duped, too? OMG 😲
Look, if we want to argue about 18 year old threads we will! ... but thank you for reminding us what idiots we are. I will go and hang my head in shame now .... over and out (of this thread).

thecarpathian702 posts11-06-2019 7:58pmYou guys realize this thread is 18 years old, right? And since the OP hasn’t posted anything new anywhere since 2001, I’m gonna go out on a limb and say he’s pretty much moved on......probably in more ways than one.

 its high electrical conductivity (59.6×106 S/m) and high thermal conductivity, second highest (second only to silver) among pure metals at room temperature.[10] This is because the resistivity to electron transport in metals at room temperature originates primarily from scattering of electrons on thermal vibrations of the lattice, which are relatively weak in a soft metal
the electrical activity in copper when brought back to room temp will not be any better than with no treatment. ive done cross sections of copper/gold/silver/plat/irridium/plutonium/thorium/ etc in research for conductivity and transmission speed of the electron/hole pairs for semiconductor chip upgrades cause the time a Ghz signal enters a pc board to the time it hits the transistor junction in the processer does make a lag in the output. but that is only signifient in the GHZ freq range. totally silly effect in the khz and down. even high freq MRI magnets with cryo cooled power supplys are for the reason of lower resistance and no infulence in the resultant mri results- so if you think itsounds different its your $$ to waste. ive done it to liquid HE,H.O2, and colder.you may likely suffer more damage due to slip face kinda like embritlement in the lattice no matter how slow warmed up, the inital cold shock will offset the lattice a few minutes/deg. upsetting the outer 3-4 electrons orbit. yea.
otherwise copper is ultra stabil electrically and mechanically. cryo for fe based elements is a totally different reason.


taken from Cu atomic info
What is Metallography?

Metallography is the study of the structure of metals. It includes the techniques used to prepare specimens for examination, examining the specimen and interpreting the structures. Specimen preparation is an important part of metallography. A specimen must be appropriately prepared to ensure correct observation and interpretation of the microstructure. Specimen preparation consists of sample selection, sectioning, grinding, polishing, and etching. Adequate sample selection provides a statistically reliable description of the material quality. The number, location and orientation of the samples examined are important parameters in sample selection. Sectioning, grinding and polishing are used to prepare a flat specimen with a mirror like finish. Care must be taken during sample preparation not to introduce artifacts which lead to invalid microstructure interpretations. Sometimes it is beneficial to examine the specimen in the as polished condition. The as polished condition is useful for examining the microstructures of materials whose constituents exhibit large differences in light reflectivity after polishing. Porosity and inclusions are examples of features that are easily observed in the as polished condition. But most materials are etched to reveal the microstructure. Etching is a controlled corrosion process resulting form electrolytic action between surface areas of different potential. Etching reveals the microstructure of a material by selective dissolution of the structure. Specimens are then examined using optical and electron microscopes. There are also many other techniques used to characterize the structure of metals, but this article will concentrate on microstructural characterization.

Please see the proof below
https://www.copper.org/resources/properties/microstructure/coppers.html
You guys realize this thread is 18 years old, right? And since the OP hasn’t posted anything new anywhere since 2001, I’m gonna go out on a limb and say he’s pretty much moved on......probably in more ways than one.
Could we possibly get back to the topic and not keep feeding geoffkait? I'm beginning to not want to click on this thread anymore.
geoffkait,

You have probably been too busy braking barriers of curent physics, but could you elavorate on my question from this morning?

geoffkait,

"At the molecular level, electrons that make up any electrical pulse jump from one conductive molecule to the next."
Do you accept this?
geoffkait,

Pay attention even if you have issues with comprehension. LIGO did consider cooling. Keeping it cool, unlike all the cables. Different things.
Post removed 
Glubson, try to pay attention. We’re taking about LIGO, not LEGO. By the way, shouldn’t you be outside riding your horsey? 🐴