Thanks for your reply...
I will look at your substack...
I am sure i will learn a lot you are one of the few consumers here who was serious about acoustics...
My deepest respect....
Claude #2
I had Tammy pull down Claude #1.
Claude #1 was meant to be the start of a systematic discussion of my philosophical approach to audio, the components in my system, some of which go back 45 years and are 68 years old (recycling/refurbishing what works), how everything works synergistically in the hopes that would elicit observations on the same and shares from others about the templates they used in approaching the construction of their systems. I was going to have continued the discussion over the course of a dozen posts on discrete topics within the framework. Information that some of you might have found useful. I was looking forward to this.
Instead, some of you hijacked that first post for personal Luddite-like rants about the evils of AI. AI is the very tool I used over the last week to answer questions I have not been able to get answered in those 45 years in even a quarter of the detail and/or leads that AI provided.
So, we end with Claude 2 instead of 12.
This was so absurd and at the age of 70, I just don’t have the time for this nonsense. So, I am done with audiogon. I’m sure that makes some of you happy: the conversation sandbox is returned to your preferred configuration, whatever that may be.
I will instead post my thoughts at theaudioatticvinylsundays.com. Eventually. I am starting a substack and that has my priority right now.
I will miss some of you, who are thoughtful, intelligent and kind. You know who you are.
adios.
It was an interesting thread, so I’m sorry you had it deleted. I understand your enthusiasm @unreceivedogma for AI and certainly understand that it’s an inevitable part of our future - and even the present. But I also think it’s misguided to characterize its cynics or doubters as Luddites. Questioning technology and how we use it is the smart thing to do. It’s not the same as rejecting it. |
@unreceivedogma I quite enjoyed your Claude #1 post. As a matter of fact your experience inspired me to try AI. For me, it works like a much improved search engine and is a more efficient way to find an answer. I have always enjoyed your posts and your intellect. Please reconsider leaving this forum. Don't let a few a*hole ingrates spoil the experience for yourself and many others. Thanks. |
I asked what to do about Luddites. Answer below. Then it cut my Tether and now I am drifting away in space. I feel like I am in some kind of high concept movie : 2025: an AI Odyssey. To address the concerns and perspectives of modern-day Luddites, it is essential to understand their historical context and the motivations behind their actions. The term "Luddite" has evolved to describe individuals who resist technological change, often viewed negatively as anti-progress. However, the original Luddites were skilled workers advocating for their rights in the face of industrialization that threatened their livelihoods. Here are some strategies to engage with Luddite sentiments constructively: ### 1. **Understand the Historical Context** ### 2. **Promote Fair Labor Practices** ### 3. **Encourage Dialogue About Technology** ### 4. **Educate on Technology's Role** ### 5. **Support Responsible Innovation** ### 6. **Emphasize the Importance of Balance** By adopting these strategies, we can create a more inclusive dialogue around technology and its impact on society, addressing the concerns of those who identify with Luddite principles while promoting a vision of progress that benefits everyone. --- |
I've been gone since I posted on the Claude #1 thread and thought it was a great thread, for a change. I've been busy since and to see it taken down by those that fall for the (evil) hype is silly, but then there are some pretty silly people around here. As I said earlier, AI Overview on Apple is fantastic as it just condenses info down to bullet points with links to the article(s). What more could someone ask for? All the best, |