Brinkman Spyder review- anyone hear it?


I put an ear to this table briefly last week. I was impressed to say the least. Slightly on the warm side, and a very analog sound. I would have liked to hear a little more openness, but again, just heard it briefly. I plan on spending more time with the table in early May. I prefer this table over the Bardo, though I'm sure opinions may differ. It is $5000 more, but to my ears, quite different than it's DD sibling.
fjn04
Fjn, Same tonearm and cartridge on both the Bardo and Spyder? Same downstream components?
I heard subtle spatial cues with the Spyder, that I did not with the Bardo.
Hiho- that's fair to say, yes. That' how I heard it anyway.

"Slightly on the warm side, and a very analog sound."

"but to my ears, quite different than it's DD sibling."

"The Bardo is a nice table, just not my cup o' tea."



Does that mean the Bardo is not as analog sounding? By the way, the Spyder uses a motor (Sinus) that's developed from the design of the Bardo. Maybe the belt's compliance adds a touch of "warmth" to the sound. Maybe.

.
Fjn, What don't you like about the Bardo? That might be a place to start.
We have yet to see a Brinkmann belt drive table that was perfectly speed correct based on the Timeline. The Bardo proved otherwise. How would that affect the sound? Depends on how sensitive your pitch is.
I failed to mention there is a Spyder review in this months Stereophile. Sorry, that's what I was referring to when I mentioned review in my post.