Biwiring make any sense?

If you want to biamp and you have existing biwired cables, that means you have to Block off two extra ends that you don't use anymore and that's a pain in the neck.  I wonder if that's a problem?

The jumper is another issue, I think biwiring probably does a better good job then a jumper does and this is probably a good reason to get biwire

Does this make sense?

Dumb question.  How about owning biwire speaker cables but the speakers have only two terminals instead of 4?   Is the signal split and flows into the naked or unhooked up wire?  Any negative impact on the sound from that?

 How about owning biwire speaker cables but the speakers have only two terminals instead of 4?   Is the signal split and flows into the naked or unhooked up wire? 

@kclone , I make no claim to have a real tight grasp on electrical theory, but it seems to me that what you have described would be sub-optimal. The signal would be starting out on what seems to me to be one gauge of wire but then arriving at the speaker on a narrower gauge of wire.  What you could do in that scenario, I think, is if the termination at the speaker end was spades, you could double them up so you had two on each speaker post.

Sure, if you just had one set of terminals.  Then you're basically giving yourself a fatter wire.  No harm there if you already have those wires, but if you're just starting out just buy the bigger wire!  If you have two sets of terminals, then you can avoid using jumpers, and maybe that's a positive.  Beamping seems like it makes more theoretical sense, but then you're getting into the old cost vs benefit thing, which is ok.