In my experience (and only that), big speakers don't necessarily mean big sound. Some years ago I went from large Magnepan MG 3s to small ProAc Response 2s. I thought the ProAcs sounded better and certainly no "smaller." Last September I went from Gallo Nucleus Ultimates (huge 4-ball speakers in a five-foot-high "cage") to diminutive Gallo Reference 3s. I swear the sound is substantially "bigger," but found that many friends believed their eyes instead of their ears. BTW, my room is approx. 18 x 40'. Good luck, Dave
Big Sound = Big Speakers = Big Problems?
Do these three necessarily go together? I currently have the Dynaudio Confidence 3 speakers, and my only consistent sense of shortcoming is that, on some pieces, the sound is constrained in size. Given that I consistently read in reviews of monitors the description (inevitability) of a sense of scale, I have to assume that to get appropriate "size" of sound, I'd need to use bigger speakers.
Unfortunately, I have also read in more than one place that big speakers create big problems. My room is 14x18x8, so medium sized. Paired with a Velodyne DD-15, I get nice full-range sound, and on pieces that are over-hot in the bass, I can just turn off the Velodyne for a while.
So, is it reasonable to expect that a physically bigger speaker would likely yield a bigger sound.
And, is it likely that a bigger speaker will inevitably lead to bigger problems getting good sound in a room of my size.
Thanks
Unfortunately, I have also read in more than one place that big speakers create big problems. My room is 14x18x8, so medium sized. Paired with a Velodyne DD-15, I get nice full-range sound, and on pieces that are over-hot in the bass, I can just turn off the Velodyne for a while.
So, is it reasonable to expect that a physically bigger speaker would likely yield a bigger sound.
And, is it likely that a bigger speaker will inevitably lead to bigger problems getting good sound in a room of my size.
Thanks
9 responses Add your response