Just a follow-up to my post in this thread from three months ago... I've since sold my ultraRendu and now use the Ayre QX-5 Twenty as a one-box system.
For fun I had a friend help with some (unscientific) blind testing with him as the swapper and me as the listener. I found that I couldn't even reliably tell when he had actually changed anything, let alone tell which I preferred as "better". With the ultraRendu in the system and without - it sounded great to me. So, I decided to stick with the simpler configuration. For what it's worth... |
I'm not sure what I was imagining in my previous post re inserting a microRendu. I don't hear any noise with ethernet directly to the QX-5/20, and the sound is superb.
db |
I use dCS NB connected to QX-5 via Cardas Clear AES/EBU cables. The best sound I've achieved so far. QX-5 is the beast, just find a way how to wake it up. |
@dbphd
https://www.sonore.us/systemoptique.html
Take a look at the optical network. The optical cable is supposed to eliminate noise, unlike regular Ethernet. I am going to set up an optical network next and either buy a DAC with an optical input (such as Lumin X1) or take a look at the Sonare optical network kit which allows optical to USB (via a few devices). |
I currently connect ethernet directly to my Ayre QX-5 Twenty. Would inserting a Senore microRendu for USB connection add any value?
|
Have you heard ethernet properly implemented with FMC, LPS , switches " |
USB with a SOtM tX-USB Ultra definitely sounds better than the ethernet input. |
I use ethernet directly to my QX-5 Twenty, but I bought a microRendu to use between a Mini that tuns Roon 24/7 and an Ayre Codex. It hasn't been shipped yet. I hope Roon doesn't have a problem finding it as an endpoint. |
Thanks everyone for your input. I look forward to pulling the trigger on a QX-5 Twenty very soon. |
The network input on the QX-5 Twenty is based on a module from ConversDigital. It sounds very good and if it were my only option I'd be happy with it. It makes a fantastic one-box system at a desk with headphones and powered monitors.
But, in my experience, a Sonore ultraRendu streaming to the USB input on the Ayre sounds just a little better. That's what I use. |
My QX 5 (Dac mode) is currently being fed from the Melco NZ60 , which I hope to replace this year with a Innuos Zenith Mk3. so unfortunately cant use AES/EBU but Im glad to hear it sounds even better through AES/EBU.
|
My skepticism fades away. |
I had the same question that has been posted, few months ago. I read and asked questions and this is what I have done and I love it.
i have a lumin mini u1 streaming via cardas clear aes/ebu interconnect to my qx 5 twenty. I got the basic qx-5 without a internet or streamer. The qx-5 functions as a pure dac, with the volume bypassed. They feed to a kx-r twenty which feeds a pair of mx-r twenties . All connections are balanced and are cardas clear. My ayre c-5 also feeds the qx5 via the other aes/ebu input .
the qx5 functions as a digital hub with the volume bypassed . I am very happy with the sound. |
The U1 Mini connects to the QX5 via AES/EBU, which I have found to sound the best with the Ayre DAC. I generally avoid USB, so I am not surprised that ethernet sounds better than USB. To be clear, the ethernet input of the QX5 sounds very good. It is just that the U1 Mini is better.
|
I must of missed the thread on CA where Charlie Hansen said the QX 5 ethernet is a bit of a compromise, Is your QX 5 connected with ethernet or USB from the U1 mini.
I think it was Michael at Arye who told me over the phone along with several other QX 5 owners ( including myself ) feel the ethernet sounds better then USB.
|
I’m not sure what "claim" you think I’m making. I listen to my QX5 in a balanced set up as well, with an Ayre AX5 Twenty.
To be clear, I am using the Lumin U1 Mini as a streamer into the QX5 and comparing it to the QX5’s own internal streamer. The U1 mini is a noticeably better streamer, but unless you do the direct comparison, the internal streaming capability sounds perfectly fine.
This is consistent with some comments by the late Charley Hansen on the Computer Audiophile thread on the QX5. Hansen had said (I am paraphrasing) that the ethernet input of the QX5 was a bit of a compromise and that a good external streamer had the capability of sounding better. It’s worth reading the thread for this and other helpful and interesting comments from Hansen.
|
I’m skeptical of rossb’s claim, but John Atkinson’s review of the QX-5 Twenty for Stereophile did suggest it’s sound improved when paired with a KX-5 Twenty. Ayre gear always seems to sound best in a balanced setup, and I've only heard mine with that pairing. |
I have a QX5 Twenty. The ethernet input is adequate, but I find that a Lumin U1 Mini sounds noticeably better.
|
Im not sure this addresses your question. I run Roon core on a Mac Mini that sends files via ethernet to an Ayre QX-5 Twenty. In addition to rips and downloads, I stream Qobuz and Tidal. The audio chain includes Ayre KX-5/VX-5 Twenty preamp/amp driving KEF Ref 1s supplemented by a pair of Velodyne HGS-10s with SMS-1 bass management. The sound quality is superb. Files sent to the asynchronous USB port of an Ayre DX-5 DSD sound nearly as good. |
