You're certain your not thinking of the mention of setting the bias point at 65mv so that the tubes are driven at 32 watts of a potential 48?
AR Classic 60 Bias Confusion
Purchased my Classic 60 new in 1991. Loved the sound for many years. Had it retubed in 2013 but little time to listen with a toddler running around. All I know is that the amp has never sounded the same since being retubed.
The new tubes were old style Winged C 6550s.
I thought I should check the bias to be sure the tech who installed the new tubes had it right. It’s running at 36mv on the left and 33mv on the right. These numbers are pretty close to the 32.5mv bias recommended in my manual that came with the amp.
My problem is that every bias setting I have seen online for the Classic 60, including the pdf manual downloadable from AR says the bias should be 65mv.
Does anyone know whether AR had two versions of the amp? Is my manual a misprint at 32.5mv? 65ma is mentioned in my manual as the nominal current per tjbe but no mention of 65mv as the correct buas).
I’ve sent the question in to AR service but no doubt they are busy. Not sure when they will be able to respond.
Any insight would be greatly appreciated,
Perry
32.5mv x 2 =65mv. Logic suggests to me that each tube is biased for 32.5 mv but perhaps with this amp you must bias two tubes at the same time, i.e. the setting would be for 2 tubes, 65mv.. I don’t know about your amp specifically but, for example I had an amp which had this set up - you had two tubes (on each side) and the bias was set with one circuit on each side. They even had an amp with 6 tubes on each side and only one bias circuit for each side. Made for getting matched tubes essential. |
@perryg reading over the manual a bit, appears to be written more for a tech who's familiar with the basic procedure. Check this too - here is an older post on Audiogon worth browsing. There are varying references to different measurement values of 65ma, 65mv, and .65vdc used interchangeably - pay close attention to that, use of alligator clips, and a few other comments about how to do this. Some of the replies down on the first page are a bit more informative and helpful fwiw. Something else for reference, be sure to note the 2-3hr waiting time to let the amp reach full operation on your very last bias check before closing up.
|
Do not make any other adjustments of pots in the amp.
For power tube bias adjustments go to pages 7 and 8. https://www.arcdb.ws/Database/CL60/ARC_CL60_manual.pdf
|
The tech most likely got it right with a bias of 32.5ma. Based on the manual, there is a plate voltage of 420V and a bias of -46 V. If the output transformer is between 4 and 6k ohms, then 65 ma is the correct bias for the 6550 tube as it operates at 65% dissipation in Class A/B (or "enriched A/B" as ARC calls it). But that is a 42 watt tube. If using the 6550C, which is rated at 35 watts max dissipation, a bias of 65ma will take you into Class A operation (80% dissipation) territory and definitely not a recommended thing to do unless the amplifier is designed from the ground up to operate in Class A/A1. By using a bias of 32.5ma at 420V plate and -46V bias, that is "cold" Class A/B operation instead of "enriched" Class A/B the CL-60 was designed for. Don’t crank up the bias until you hear from ARC |
Many thanks for all of the input. I will look at the old forum post. I’m comfortable and careful working around high voltages but sadly my knowledge of amplifier/tube function is essentially nil. I know enough to know where to test and how, but beyond that I’m a bit lost. I have enjoyed listening to it which I can do:) It doesn’t seem as though there should be rocket science here but the bias in my manual is clearly different than the one online. The amp has two pairs of matched quads. I can’t recall if the Classic 30 has two matched pairs. Maybe my adjustment page should be in a Classic 30 manual? I just know that the Classic 60 manual in the ARDB says to set the bias to 65mv. I’m curious to see what the reply from AR service will say. In the mean time I’ll leave the bias as it is and read back in the forum. Thanks again for all of the info. |
I found this video for the ARC Classic 60. For the bias adjustment go to time marker 12:20. Note, when the tech first starts taking about where he has the meter probes attached on the left side of the amp he say points 2 & 4. I pretty sure he meant to say 3 & 4. When he moves to the right side of the amp he says points 1 & 2.
|
Hi jea48, I know that same video and have been in touch with Mitch who was the tech who made that youtube post. He does say 65mv in that clip. I also noticed the labeling of the test points but the locations of the points for each side were really what I wanted to see and he illustrated that well. I figured out the TP numbers on my own. I suppose I could have checked the Classic 30 manual on the ARCDB website earlier. It lists a bias setting of 32.5mv.
I have to leave town for 5 days but will set the bias to 65 when I get home. Looking forward to hearing how it sounds. Will keep you guys posted. |
I hope you have at least a pair of something like these.
You’ll need something insulated to connect the DMM two probe leads to the two bias points on the circuit board for channel of the amp. You’ll need the meter around the other side so you will be able the read the display as you adjust the blue trim pot. I thought my ARC VT50 amps where a PITA to bias the power tubes. The Classic 60 looks worse. Older ARC amps were not user friendly when it came to biasing the power tubes. At least you don’t have to bias the input and driver tubes for each channel like I do on the VT50. That can hours to do... |
Ok folks, Here is the response straight from the hoARse’s mouth. (Sorry for the bad pun). audio research HIGH DEFINITION® Page 2 So there we have it. 65mv. I’m not sure that I like the the disclaimer about this supplement not supposed to replace the supplied manual because that’s exactly what I’ll be doing. They didn’t officially admit to two iterations of the Classic 60 or to the error in my manual but this was the response.
Thanks for everyone’s help.
|
I finally got back home and biased the Classic 60 up to 65mv. I thought that the amp sounded so lean and lifeless initially because the new tubes needed to break in. All I can say is the amp is back. The wide soundstage, detail, beautiful mids, solid bottom end and floating highs with all instruments all back where there they shoild be. This has been a long time coming. Will have to listen to my music again. As said before, thanks to all. The gon community is like no other.
Perry |
Post removed |