AI-Written Stereophile Articles


Has anyone else noticed that some of Stereophile's articles are sounding decidedly "off" and just plain badly written? I have now read several that sound suspiciously like they're AI generated (bizarre phrasing, odd syntax, etc.). Just curious if others are noticing the same.

bojack

No one is more amused by asvjerry that he himself. He's cracking himself up. Harmless, though.

"....than by he, himself."

Better form.....that AI jargon must be catchy...

AI:  Super senstivie measurements.  No subjective listening biases. Expansive vocabulary.

Audio review(er) problem solved?

Except ...

... people have less than perfect instruments on board, are subject to bias(es) and stumble with finding the right words to describe our observations.  So, we need people, not machines, to have meaningful conversations about high performance audio.

A Google engineer says AI has become sentient. What does that actually mean?

 

"If we think consciousness is important, it probably is because we're concerned that we're building some kind of system that's living a life of misery or suffering in some way that we're not recognizing," said Vold.

"If that really is what's motivating us, then I think we need to be reflective about the other species in our natural system and see what kind of suffering we may be causing them. There's no reason to prioritize AI over other biological species that we know have a much stronger case of being conscious."