Aesthetix Mimas vs. Calypso + Atlas?


I have been very happy with an Aesthetix Calypso Signature preamp, and have been keeping an eye out for a used Atlas or Atlas Signature amp. I’ve heard great things about the Mimas integrated, and wondering if that might be another direction to go. 

Has anyone has heard the Mimas compared to the Calypso + Atlas combo and can speak to the differences in sound?

 

Associated equipment: Vandersteen Quatro (wood, not CT), Belles 150 Reference V2 amplifier, Schiit Yggy DAC, SOTM SMS-200 streamer, Anticables shotgun bi-wire speaker cable, Bluejeans LC-1 interconnects.


mnski
Post removed 

according to this review, the Mimas is very close to the Calypso/Atlas combo and is better in some ways, sound density is mentioned.

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=zh-TW&u=https://review.u-audio.com.tw/review...

Enter your text ...

I would change to the CT version of your speaker first....but the several people I know w MIMAS say it is fantastic.

I am an Aesthetix owner and Jim White fan
Kclone- It was interesting reading a translated review- thank you.

Tomic- that is a good idea to consider. I’ve heard only great things about the CT.

I’m also making some speaker positioning changes per Johnny R’s guidance.
I have gone from the Calypso/Atlas to the Mimas with a pit stop in between. I owned the Calypso/Atlas for many years driving a pair of Vandersteen cloth Quatro’s. It was a great combination and I lost all system envy for those 5 years. My Aesthetix pieces were the standard versions.

I had to sell the system when I moved to Italy and when I came back I moved into a loft and no longer had a dedicated listening room. I bought a different system with an Ayre Integrated and Harbeth SHL5+ speakers. Harbeth’s play better at low volumes than any other speaker I have heard and that was important to me. I lived happily with that system for a few years.

Last year I heard the Mimas paired with Vandersteen Treo CT’s and decided to make the change. The Mimas seems to have a more musical character than what I remember of the separates though not by much. My dealer thinks that the simpler circuit and the use of only 1 tube per channel may be the reason. Aesthetix now makes a preamp, the Pallene, that uses the same circuit and he likes it better than the Calypso. AGON member tomstruck uses this combination with his Quatro’s.

With all of that said I would keep the Calypso if I were you. I have not heard it with the Belles amp but every Belles amp I have heard sounds great. I heard the Belles Virtuoso with the new Vandersteen Kento’s and it was amazing. I have heard the Vandersteen 7’s with an Eclipse Atlas and the new Aesthetix Metis preamp and I think it sounds better than any of the amps I have heard with the 7’s including Richards wonderful monoblocks. Just my opinion of course.

I agree with Tomic on trying to get the CT version of the Quatro’s if you have the opportunity. The CT tweeter is a major upgrade and finally allows the Vandies to sound good at low volumes.

You can also have the Calypso upgraded to Eclipse levels. You might want to contact JohnnyR (audioconnection) if you are looking for a used Atlas as I believe he may have one. He’s also a Belles dealer and I am sure he can give you some good advice.

Good Luck!