50 years on---the brilliance of The Band and their astounding debut album.

n80, is the label lime green? 1969 is only one year removed from the album's 1968 release, which had the old "rainbow" Capitol label. What leads you to believe your copy is a "repress"? I'm not sure the album sold enough in a year to need a second pressing; that would of course be dependent on how many copies Capitol initially pressed. I have seen covers bearing the "Gold Album" emblem, but that took years to achieve, I believe. The 2nd album sold better initially than did MFBP, achieving higher Billboard and Cashbox chart positions.

MFBP was released when Hendrix, Cream, The Who, and the other "guitar bands" dominated most Rock listeners musical tastes and diets, and sounded very odd, not at all familiar or "friendly". Levon Helm recounted in his autobiography that when they took the stage at Woodstock (following, of all people, Ten Years After, a band that bludgeoned Blues music), The Band were concerned they might come off sounding like, as he put it, "choir boys". Before breaking into their first song, Levon said to the audience "Hope ya'll like Country music".

So true n80. 1968 was truly a landmark year, with an abnormal number of either really great or highly influential (or both!) albums. Two Byrds albums (The Notorious Byrd Brothers and Sweetheart Of The Rodeo) came out that year!

1968 saw the debut albums of Blood, Sweat & Tears (the Al Kooper version), The Electric Flag, Tiny Tim, Quicksilver Messenger Service, The Steve Miller Band, Fairport Convention, Pentangle, Randy Newman (a really great album), Credence Clearwater Revival, The Jeff Beck Group, Blue Cheer (oy ;-), Three Dog Night, Jethro Tull, Dillard & Clark, Nazz, Traffic, George Harrison (Wonderwall Music), John Lennon & Yoko Ono (double oy), Neil Young, James Taylor, and Spirit. Wow.

Don’t fret n80, your experience is part of the LP learning curve! For us older guys who already had LP collections before the CD was introduced, learning about all the different pressings of an LP, and the sonic differences imbedded in their grooves, was part of our evolution as music lovers with an audiophile bent. A good source for that kind of information is Michael Fremer’s Analog Planet, and mastering engineer Steve Hoffman’s website.

If you are interested in getting CD’s of the first two Band albums (as well as the 3rd and 4th, which are also well worth owning), Mobile Fidelity offers them on SACD as well as LP. MFBP and the 2nd album were remastered by Capitol Records in the 1990’s with bonus tracks of alternate takes, mixes, etc. Not essential, but if you can find them cheap they are of interest.

One more point to be made about Music From Big Pink vs. the brown album: the Americana music movement, rightfully said to be heavily influenced (if not actually created by) by The Band, takes it's source material, sound, and style from the brown album (and The Basement Tapes) much more than from Music From Big Pink. MFBP was nothing less than revolutionary upon it's release in 1968, actually changing the course of Pop music for a great number of songwriters, singers, and musicians (less so for the general public, who at the time were just being introduced to Zeppelin, Black Sabbath, Jethro Tull, ELP, etc.). But the songwriting, singing, and musicianship on that album are quite impossible to emulate, unlike the brown album (very difficult, but not impossible ;-). I hear the influence of the brown in the music of a lot of my current favorite artists, but very little of MFBP. It really is on a pedestal by itself. I am in absolute awe each and every time I play and hear it, and still can barely believe it exists. I cherish it beyond my ability to express in words.

@slaw, sorry for what Steve? No apology necessary, everything you said is fine by me! I agree about $30 being too much for an "RL" pressing of the brown LP (let alone $60!); I’ve had original UK pressings of both MFBP and the brown album since the late 60’s, and recently went looking for USA "RL" pressings (after reading a comment about them by you, as a matter of fact), and found a Mint Minus copy of each on ebay awhile back for ten bucks apiece. You have to know what to look for in LP listings (there is no substitute for experience), and be patient enough to wait for really clean copies to pop up. But I think the $30 n80 paid was for a new Mobile Fidelity pressing, which is a fine price, and money well spent.

@N80, sorry for your confusion over which album is which. Music From Big Pink is the album with cover art painted (poorly ;-) by Dylan, and a photograph on the rear cover of the Big Pink house in Saugerties, NY. The brown album has an almost-sepia-toned photograph of The Band taken outside on it’s front cover. Both albums are imo excellent (to put it mildly), but very different. The brown album is easily digestible on first listen, being not so austere as MFBP. The brown has an "organic" sound---lots of acoustic instruments, and a "down home" recorded sound quality, no studio effects. MFBP was recorded in pro studios in NYC and L.A., the brown album recorded by producer John Simon on a 4-track recorder rented from Capitol Records, done in the pool cabana of a house The Band rented in L.A. They stayed in the house, and went out to the cabana every day to record, set up in a circle facing each other (as they had done in the MFBP sessions, after talking the engineers into the idea). Here’s something else to know about both albums: the singing was recorded simultaneously with the instruments, not over-dubbed later. VERY few bands are capable of doing that.

@n80, I feel I should tell you Music From Big Pink sounds like no other album you have ever heard, and some find it takes quite a few playings for it to "reveal" itself. I myself didn't understand it for about a year after it's release, not getting into it until after the 2nd s/t ("brown") album had won me over. The 2nd is more assessable, doesn't sound as "odd" (in comparison to other bands/groups) as does MFBP. So try and find a clean copy of the 2nd Band album as well---you may, as do many, like it more than the first.

I'm guessing the $60 copy you saw was the desirable pressing that was mastered by Bob (Robert) Ludwig, identified by his RL initials scratched into the dead wax near the LP's paper label. If you like MFBP enough to justify more than one copy, Mobile Fidelity has an excellent version available on LP and SACD, the same with the 2nd album.

Could be slaw. I don’t imagine RR would own two studios, but it’s possible. If it’s located in Malibu, I’m sure it is. My favorite studio in L.A. is Ocean Way, where Ry Cooder records. GREAT sounding albums come out of there, including John Hiatt’s Bring The Family. I haven’t recorded there---it’s WAY above my pay grade ;-) .

I did track in the old RCA studio in Hollywood, in the huge room The Stones recorded "Satisfaction" in, and in which Sinatra recorded. It has a hardwood floor and adjustable walls, a very "live" sounding room. I overdubbed some percussion and vocals to an existing recording, engineered by Tchad Blake (Los Lobos, Elvis Costello, Richard Thompson, T Bone Burnett, many others). Very cool guy, and a great engineer.

Fair enough, brother! Just to be clear, it’s not vocal perfection I hear in The Band. They aren’t note perfect like CSN (whose harmonies I find too "pretty", a little prissy. I think it may be Graham Nash’s fault ;-), being kind of loose and sloppy, but intentionally so. And I wasn’t holding the singing of The Band up as a standard to which I expected The Dead (or anyone else) to equal. The point I was trying to make (unsuccessfully, perhaps) was that the type of music found on Workingman’s Dead requires a certain level of vocal ability to pull off successfully, and that The Dead did not possess that ability. There abilities were of a different sort, and what The Dead did well nobody else has come close, an accomplishment few bands can claim.

I apologize for the angst my comments caused you. I do suffer from an unfortunate and unactractive proclivity to become somewhat dogmatic when I pontificate on a subject of great importance to me, which The Band, as you may have surmised, is to me. And, if this paragraph is any indication, from pretentiousness ;-) .

Good post jriggy. I read Jerry or Bob say it was CSN’s harmonizing that prompted them to start trying to sing. And I know Jerry played banjo in Folk/Bluegrass bands around Stanford University in Palo Alto (whose Frat houses my High School garage band played at in 1967-8. My introduction to the joys and danger of alcohol ;-). However, the songs and playing on Workingman’s Dead show no non-vocal CSN influence, but a lot of The Band’s. Listen to the two, back-to-back. It’s obvious. As does Neil Young’s Harvest, the only album of his that sounds as it does. Have you carefully watched Neil’s face and body language as he is brought up on stage at The Last Waltz? And what he says about The Band at that moment? Look for the "white substance" in his nostrils---he’s loaded to the gills!

As to my opinion of The Dead’s singing.....I thought Pig Pen’s vocals fit their music pretty well when I saw them live in The Panhandle at Golden Gate Park in the Summer of ’67 (top THAT ;-). He did most the singing, though I think Jerry sings on "The Golden Road (To Unlimited Devotion)", a cool song. They were a VERY different band on their 1967 debut album, almost proto-punk in a way. They moved into extended jamming on their 1968 2nd and 1969 3rd albums, the one’s of theirs’ I actually kinda like. So I was not prepared for Workingman’s Dead in 1970. You know they toured across Canada in 1970 with The Band (as documented in the documentary Festival Express) and others, right? Coincidence?

Back to Jerry and Bob’s singing. We’ll have to agree to disagree. I played and recorded with a songwriter who had perfect pitch, and I’m afraid he drilled harmony and counterpoint singing into my brain. I can’t STAND even slightly flat singing, and their singing is far more than slightly flat. It’s just SO sour. You can’t hear that? As for soul, sorry mate, my standards are pretty high in that regard. Ray Charles, Solomon Burke, Big Joe Turner, Wilson Pickett, and, yes, The Band’s Richard Manuel sing soulfully. Jerry and Bob sound like boys to me, not men. They are constantly straining to reach notes, and lots of words are sung as if they are running out of breath. They are simply not very talented singers.

The Band were not all alone in their musical direction. There was an entire underground counter-Counter-Culture taking place, rejecting the psychedelic style and substance that was in style in 1967-68 for a more "organic" music. Bob Dylan turned his back on the anti-authoritarian movement he was largely responsible for creating earlier in the decade, and his December 1967 album John Wesley Harding, his first since Blonde On Blonde, was a complete musical about-face. A very quiet, rural-sounding album (recorded in Nashville) featuring mostly acoustic guitar, electric bass, drums, and pedal steel, with lyrics containing Biblical references, it stood in stark contrast to the bombast taking place in Rock. I had NO idea what to make of it. Until I "got" Music From Big Pink, that is.

There was also the new, very Country version of the Byrds, new member Gram Parsons taking David Crosby’s place and essentially leadership of the group in 1967. Gram was brought in by Byrd’s bassist Chris Hillman, who knew him from their Bluegrass days in New England. Everybody I knew had their Sweethearts Of The Rodeo album, and loved it. Parson’s and Hillman left The Byrds after that album, starting the hugely-influential Flying Burrito Brothers.

Buffalo Springfield had a hit right out of the gate, with the classic "For What It’s Worth" single. Member Neil Young was, like The Band, a Canadian, and was extremely impressed by them. As I have said previously, his Harvest album is obviously his response to The Band’s brown album.

Then there was Dan Hicks, who almost openly mocked the overblown music that was most popular in the Rock world. Great songwriter, much more clever than Frank Zappa, another satirist who mocked Rock and the Hippies who were it’s audience.

There were lots more great underground-level artists working in the field planted by Dylan and The Band, but there were also hugely popular artists emerging who were making more "musical" music. Jackson Browne, Carole King, James Taylor, people like that. The whole singer/songwriter thing, which is not really the same as The Band and their ilk. Still, better than some more 10-minute guitar solo bands ;-) .

You may notice that the music being made by the people I’m talking about is very much Country and Folk Music-influenced, or even derived. The music being made by most bands in 1967-68 had become more Blues-based. The Band very much had Blues roots, but that wasn’t very obvious on Music From Big Pink. Whereas most bands were playing music in which the Country element in Rock 'n' Roll (Elvis, Buddy Holly, The Everly Brothers, Carl Perkins, Jerry Lee Lewis, Johnny Cash, all hillbillies who played Country before Rock 'n' Roll) had been completely eliminated, The Band put it back in.

Agree completely tostadosunidos. Discussing an album can leave out the absolute joy it brings. I still laugh out loud at some of the things I hear The Band play and sing on MFBP. In the book included in the MFBP boxset, there is a reprint of a review of the album from the time of it’s release, in which the writer describes The Band as looking like they came out of the 19th Century. While the British bands were dressing up in stage costumes with lots of ruffles, silk, and satin, here come these mountain men in old suits and hats, very Appalachian. The Band’s music already sounded ancient when it was brand new, while Hendrix sounded brand new. It’s funny to me that Hendrix now sounds dated, Music From Big Pink still fresh. But then, I like timelessness, not timeliness ;-).

The greatness of the music of the 60’s should include the first half of the decade. Bob Dylan started in 1962, as did Brian Wilson (okay, The Beach Boys) and The Beatles. And there was also the work of Phil Spector and his girl groups, all the great Pop coming out of the songwriting of the Brill Building and Motown Records, as well as the R & B of Atlantic, Stax, and other Southern/rural music. Then there was Roy Orbison, the Surf guitarists and groups, Paul Revere & The Raiders (laugh if you want, but give a fresh listen to "Just Like Me", a KILLER song!) and The Kingsmen of the Pacific Northwest, and Chuck Berry and The Everly Brothers, who were still making great music. The pre-British Invasion 1960’s music is unjustly maligned!

jafant, the album was released on the 1st, and on that day I Googled the deluxe boxset (which contains a 2-LP 45 RPM set, a single CD, a Blu Ray-24/96 disc, a 7" 45 single of The Band’s first single "The Weight"/"I Shall Be Released", a set of prints of pics taken of The Band by Elliott Landy for the original release in 1968, and a book) and found it at a few places (Amazon, Barnes & Noble, the Hi-Fi LP sellers) for around the set’s $124.95 list price. The Band’s website was selling it for $150, and was already sold out! My LRS in Portland (Millennium Music) showed only one copy had come in, and was already gone.

I looked a little harder, and found it listed for $65.64 with free shipping on Walmart’s website, of all places! It showed only two copies in stock, and though I thought "This is too good to be true", I went ahead and bought it. It showed up four days later. It’s factory sealed, and I have no idea why Walmart decided to sell it so cheap. Who knows if they’ll ever get it back in? It’s probably essential only for Band completists, the 2-LP or single CD enough for most. Or the current Mobile Fidelity LP or SACD maybe even better, depending on how one feels about the new mix and mastering of the 50th Anniversary release.

A couple of nights ago I wrote a whole, long, very complete and detailed discussion of the recording of both Music From Big Pink and the 2nd Band album (the "brown"), including an explanation of the reason for the huge difference in sound character between the two albums, a subject broached a few days ago by slaw. The treatise took me QUITE a while to compose, and when I clicked on the "Post Your Response" button the AudiogoN system asked me to prove I wasn’t a computer by hitting another button. When I did, my post disappeared. Ay carumba! I haven’t had the energy to try again; plus, I’m not sure anyone other than I finds the subject all that interesting.