50 years on---the brilliance of The Band and their astounding debut album.


There are people who still, fifty years after it’s release on July 1st, 1968, don’t get what all the fuss made about The Band’s debut album, Music From Big Pink, is all about. I understand; I didn’t until a whole year later. It took me that long to figure out "What the heck IS this?" I didn’t get it AT ALL (I had just turned 18, and was still a boy ;-). Here’s what some people who did had to say about it at the time of it’s release:

Al Kooper: "Music From Big Pink is an event and should be treated as one. There are people who will work their whole lives away in vain and not touch it." Eric Clapton admitted as much when, while inducting them into The Rock ’n’ Roll Hall Of Fame, said "I was relieved in a way when they ended. I no longer had to live with the fact that I was not in The Band." Eric had gone to West Saugerties, NY (the town the Big Pink house, not far from Woodstock, was located) after being played Music From Big Pink by George Harrison (whereupon Eric immediately disbanded Cream), intending to ask to join The Band. He never got up the courage, and eventually realized they neither desired nor required his services ;-).

Speaking of George Harrison, during the January 2, 1969 sessions for what became The Beatles sad Get Back/Let It Be album and film (which are painful, for me at least, to listen to and/or watch), he played a new song of his for the boys, "All Things Must Pass" (which we eventually heard on George’s debut album). The song was originally written to be performed in a country-prayer style, which George later said he had imagined as sung by Band drummer Levon Helm.

During the fade-out at the end of The Beatles live performance of "Hey Jude" filmed at Twinkerham Film Studios on September 4th, 1968 and later shown on The David Frost TV show, McCartney quotes lyrics from The Band’s "The Weight" (an indescribably great song), singing "Take a load off Fanny...".

Greil Marcus, in his 1975 book Mystery Train: Images of America in Rock ’n’ Roll Music, wrote: "The richness of Big Pink is in The Band’s ability to contain endless combinations of American popular music without imitating any of them." The Band’s recordings made with Dylan in the basement of Big Pink in 1967 (now known as The Basement Tapes, The Band at the time as The Hawks) are now viewed as the genesis of what is known as Americana music. Ironic, then, that all but drummer Levon Helm are Canadians, recruited one-by one by Arkansas Rockabilly Ronnie Hawkins during his years playing clubs and bars in Canada in the late-50’s/early 60’s.

It’s hard to overstate the impact Music From Big Pink had on musicians of my generation. Everyone I knew, most especially myself, had to start all over, learning to play in the "musical" style of The Band. Gone were the Les Paul’s and Gibson SG’s into Marshall stacks, and double-kick drumsets with half-a-dozen cymbals, replaced with Telecasters into small combo amps (the Fender Deluxe Reverb a particular favorite), and 4-piece drumsets (tuned low and "thumpy", like Levon) with a couple of cymbals. Gone were the long solos and earbleed-inducing volume. In was ensemble playing, great songs, and harmony singing. Workingman’s Dead is an obvious attempt at being The Band (sabotaged by The Grateful Dead’s member’s inability to sing very well), as is Neil Young’s Harvest.

I still listen to Music From Big Pink EVERY SINGLE DAY, and have for years. Music simply does not get any better than this. There is a new, remixed and mastered (mixed by Bob Clearmountain, mastered by Bob Ludwig) release of the album by Capitol on 2-45RPM LP’s and CD, as well as a deluxe boxset with a nice book, prints of pictures taken of The Band by Elliott Landy in 1968, a Blu Ray 24/96 disc of the album, both the LP’s and CD, and a 7" 45 of The Band’s first single, "The Weight"/"I Shall Be Released". If you don’t have the album and want to, I would suggest you get the current Mobile Fidelity LP or SACD instead of this new version. I’m not yet sure about the remix.

128x128bdp24
@n80,

You posted either here or elsewhere that you really don't want to get into vinyl. Yet, by your own posts are continuing to buy vinyl and continuing to make blanket statements against this format all at the same time without having any real experience for yourself that (is required) before making blanket statements or starting posts that assumes you actually have said experience. What gives?

@slaw, sorry for what Steve? No apology necessary, everything you said is fine by me! I agree about $30 being too much for an "RL" pressing of the brown LP (let alone $60!); I’ve had original UK pressings of both MFBP and the brown album since the late 60’s, and recently went looking for USA "RL" pressings (after reading a comment about them by you, as a matter of fact), and found a Mint Minus copy of each on ebay awhile back for ten bucks apiece. You have to know what to look for in LP listings (there is no substitute for experience), and be patient enough to wait for really clean copies to pop up. But I think the $30 n80 paid was for a new Mobile Fidelity pressing, which is a fine price, and money well spent.

@N80, sorry for your confusion over which album is which. Music From Big Pink is the album with cover art painted (poorly ;-) by Dylan, and a photograph on the rear cover of the Big Pink house in Saugerties, NY. The brown album has an almost-sepia-toned photograph of The Band taken outside on it’s front cover. Both albums are imo excellent (to put it mildly), but very different. The brown album is easily digestible on first listen, being not so austere as MFBP. The brown has an "organic" sound---lots of acoustic instruments, and a "down home" recorded sound quality, no studio effects. MFBP was recorded in pro studios in NYC and L.A., the brown album recorded by producer John Simon on a 4-track recorder rented from Capitol Records, done in the pool cabana of a house The Band rented in L.A. They stayed in the house, and went out to the cabana every day to record, set up in a circle facing each other (as they had done in the MFBP sessions, after talking the engineers into the idea). Here’s something else to know about both albums: the singing was recorded simultaneously with the instruments, not over-dubbed later. VERY few bands are capable of doing that.

bdp24 I think Steve is apologizing for me, and to a lesser extent, him, for highjacking your thread.

Steve, I think you are misunderstanding me. In general my comments about vinyl have _nothing_ to do with sound quality. I'm not making any vinyl SQ verses whatever else comparisons. My only references to vinyl SQ have been in regard to measured DR variations. That's it. So experience and level of equipment is not at all relevant to the points I've made.

My issues with vinyl have nothing to do with SQ, just the whole 'ritual' for lack of a better word, the care required, etc. I haven't even suggested that this should put anyone else off. It is just my personal opinion on the matter and I've seen it shared by any number of previously dedicated vinyl fans.

I also don't think that buying a few albums constitutes any sort of contradiction. I often preface that I'm not getting into vinyl simply to indicate that I'm not looking for advice on equipment, special pressings, etc. (One of these days I might....I'm dabbling here.) Sorry if this caused confusion.

If I've crossed a line, you know, like religion, politics, etc, then I apologize. I'll try to tread more lightly in the future.
bdp24, thanks for the clarification on the two albums. I do not have the brown album yet. Will probably get it on CD soon. Not knowing how to ID albums and such, all I can say is that this pressing of MFBP is SKAO 2955 and is by Capital. SKAO 2955 is engraved in the runoff area and I do not see anything else there but some sort of arrow symbol.

If I've paid too much, shame on me. I didn't do any research.

Don’t fret n80, your experience is part of the LP learning curve! For us older guys who already had LP collections before the CD was introduced, learning about all the different pressings of an LP, and the sonic differences imbedded in their grooves, was part of our evolution as music lovers with an audiophile bent. A good source for that kind of information is Michael Fremer’s Analog Planet, and mastering engineer Steve Hoffman’s website.

If you are interested in getting CD’s of the first two Band albums (as well as the 3rd and 4th, which are also well worth owning), Mobile Fidelity offers them on SACD as well as LP. MFBP and the 2nd album were remastered by Capitol Records in the 1990’s with bonus tracks of alternate takes, mixes, etc. Not essential, but if you can find them cheap they are of interest.

One more point to be made about Music From Big Pink vs. the brown album: the Americana music movement, rightfully said to be heavily influenced (if not actually created by) by The Band, takes it's source material, sound, and style from the brown album (and The Basement Tapes) much more than from Music From Big Pink. MFBP was nothing less than revolutionary upon it's release in 1968, actually changing the course of Pop music for a great number of songwriters, singers, and musicians (less so for the general public, who at the time were just being introduced to Zeppelin, Black Sabbath, Jethro Tull, ELP, etc.). But the songwriting, singing, and musicianship on that album are quite impossible to emulate, unlike the brown album (very difficult, but not impossible ;-). I hear the influence of the brown in the music of a lot of my current favorite artists, but very little of MFBP. It really is on a pedestal by itself. I am in absolute awe each and every time I play and hear it, and still can barely believe it exists. I cherish it beyond my ability to express in words.

I kind of feel that way about Van Morrison's Astral Weeks. Very different from his other stuff, high critical acclaim, amazing musical performances by a stellar cast (jazz and studio musicians). And most general Van Morrison fans have never heard it and don't like it when they do. 

I recall not getting MFBP but like I say, on your recommendation and info I'm going to tackle it and see where it goes. Thanks.
Speaking of Van Morrison (a favorite singer of mine; I was lucky enough to see and hear him live in Them in 1967), he and Band pianist/singer Richard Manuel sing a duet on "4% Pantomime" on The Band's Cahoots album, and it is fanfreakingtastic!
I also noticed that Astral Weeks and MFBP came out the same year....along with a number of other huge albums from various greats.

So true n80. 1968 was truly a landmark year, with an abnormal number of either really great or highly influential (or both!) albums. Two Byrds albums (The Notorious Byrd Brothers and Sweetheart Of The Rodeo) came out that year!

1968 saw the debut albums of Blood, Sweat & Tears (the Al Kooper version), The Electric Flag, Tiny Tim, Quicksilver Messenger Service, The Steve Miller Band, Fairport Convention, Pentangle, Randy Newman (a really great album), Credence Clearwater Revival, The Jeff Beck Group, Blue Cheer (oy ;-), Three Dog Night, Jethro Tull, Dillard & Clark, Nazz, Traffic, George Harrison (Wonderwall Music), John Lennon & Yoko Ono (double oy), Neil Young, James Taylor, and Spirit. Wow.

Led Zep's first album was recorded that year but released on 12 Jan 68.

I was only 5 so none of this was on my radar. What a great time to be a music fan (which for me started about 1972).
n80, I believe you meant to say 12 Jan '69. I remember the moment I learned of it, from a non-musician friend of mine (I didn't have many of those ;-). I loved The Yardbirds, their first three albums still in my collection. But their 4th (5th if you count the live album) and final album---Little Games, made after Jimmy Page took over the group, was just awful. My school had the Zeppelin 1 LP in their library, so I took a listen to it. Not up my alley ;-) .
Yes, typo, thanks. 

I like the blues, particularly delta blues. Not a scholar or collector of blues per se but it resonates with me. Zeppelin copied, stole and expanded on the blues in a way that works for me so I've been a fan since the mid 70s. Robert Plant's picture is graffiti stenciled all over Clarksdale, Mississippi....ground zero for the blues.

But I get why some don't like them. I get why some blues fans don't like them.
n80, take a look (or even better a listen, if possible) at Muddy Waters' Folk Singer LP on Mobile Fidelity. Great Delta Blues, in great sound.
Will do, thanks for the tip. Most of the blues that I own are either iTunes or southern sampler CD I get yearly. Blues is an avenue that could take me into vinyl a ways. 
I purchased the new 45 rpm copy and find a slight but not dramatic improvement. As someone above mentioned it still sounds kind of thin in spots especially the first few cuts. There is an improvement in bass on some cuts. The vicals also show some improved clarity. A friend brought the cd copy over and I'd go with it for the price difference sounds about the same and also has about 6 bonus cuts.
I did some research. The MFBP album that I paid $30 for is a 1969 Capital repress so it is fairly early. On Discogs the prices range from $15 to $85 (+ shipping) for this pressing. The reasons for the wide range in price are not clear to me. Some of it seems to hinge on condition of the cover but almost all of them are rated a VG+ or VG++. Mine was rated VG++. SQ is good. A few clicks and pops but would probably benefit from a good cleaning.

All of which is to say that I don’t feel totally ripped off.

n80, is the label lime green? 1969 is only one year removed from the album's 1968 release, which had the old "rainbow" Capitol label. What leads you to believe your copy is a "repress"? I'm not sure the album sold enough in a year to need a second pressing; that would of course be dependent on how many copies Capitol initially pressed. I have seen covers bearing the "Gold Album" emblem, but that took years to achieve, I believe. The 2nd album sold better initially than did MFBP, achieving higher Billboard and Cashbox chart positions.

MFBP was released when Hendrix, Cream, The Who, and the other "guitar bands" dominated most Rock listeners musical tastes and diets, and sounded very odd, not at all familiar or "friendly". Levon Helm recounted in his autobiography that when they took the stage at Woodstock (following, of all people, Ten Years After, a band that bludgeoned Blues music), The Band were concerned they might come off sounding like, as he put it, "choir boys". Before breaking into their first song, Levon said to the audience "Hope ya'll like Country music".

It has a red label. Notes said the lime green label was earlier in 69 and the red was later but that they are the same pressing. All the same markings in the run off area (forget actual term).

Discogs indicated that it was a repress. I don't even know what that entails, just saw it there.

I was into the guitar bands in the late 70's when I was exploring 'older' rock music. The Band sounded very quaint and 'down home' to me and I did not appreciate it. I think for many people it took a greater level of maturity to appreciate The Band than some of their contemporaries.