terry9

Responses from terry9

LP Record Cleaning Machine - Ultrasonic or Vacuum
Hello Ebuzz."Some of those Elmasonic machines are as expensive ..." Just what I said to myself. Then I noticed that the Elmasonic were just that much BETTER than the complete US units for sale; 80 KHz is just the start. They are built to run relia... 
LP Record Cleaning Machine - Ultrasonic or Vacuum
Sorry for the delay, Ebuzz.I bought a skewer-like label protector for cleaning 4 records at a time, on Ebay. I mounted this on a frame, then affixed a very low speed motor to the frame. I put the frame over a German commercial grade machine from E... 
Subwoofer: should we even use them at all?
Good question, Elegal.In my opinion, it depends on the system. If your main speakers are cones, add a cone subwoofer. If your main speakers are Magnepan, add a Magnepan sub. If your main speakers are ESL's, the Magnepan sub just might be fast enough. 
Thinking about getting into vinyl again...
Hello M.After 50 years of analog, I find that a well-set-up budget vinyl rig is superior to a poorly-set-up premium rig. I suggest that you buy a minimum vinyl rig (new, because then you can expect it to be OK) and learn how to set it up. Everythi... 
LP Record Cleaning Machine - Ultrasonic or Vacuum
Ebuzz, bubbles are not bubbles. The variables are:1. size of bubbles - monotonically decreasing with increasing frequency 2. distribution of bubbles - some machines concentrate them in a few locations3. number of bubbles - some machines just don't... 
LP Record Cleaning Machine - Ultrasonic or Vacuum
RE: DamageI tested my home-made US machine by US cleaning the whole record, then stopping the motor and blasting the bottom third for 2 hours. I reasoned that the first cleaning should get rid of the gunk, and the 2 hour blast should eat away the ... 
TELEFUNKEN E88CC-TK
I have used many different iterations of Telefunken 6DJ8 variants, and older is a lot better. In order:1. 1961 Telefunken 6922 specially selected for HP2. 1964 Telefunken 6DJ8 specially selected for HP3. US Amperex wasp wasted 69224. Early Dutch A... 
Koetsu step up transformer - who knows about it?
Xronx is giving good advice.Oddly enough, I too compared a Rosewood cartridge through a Koetsu SUT (unknown vintage) and an Audio Note AN-8. The AN was much more revealing, and I would have to say somewhat better - but the cost!What I eventually d... 
Quiet"er" record cleaner?
Czar has a good idea.I built my own based on a German industrial unit from ElmaSonic. The 80KHz setting is best. But it does radiate a lot of US noise, which most people cannot hear. Nothing against my 16.5, but the US is FAR better. 
Help diagnose the kind of power treatment needed
Hello Lew.I would save your money for hardware. It's a pretty safe assumption that power at the wall is filthy. 
Capacitance settings on Manley phonostage
I hear a slight but distinct capacitance effect with my Koetsu and an SUT. I have a 250-450pF variable cap across the SUT outputs. All my records sound good somewhere within that range.As I said, the effect is slight, much less than resistive load... 
Order of importance of cables
Hello Rox.I suggest cleaning up your power. An industrial isolation transformer makes a difference, but it growls, and should be outside the music room. Almarg has good advice too, but I would add that capacitance and dielectric absorption are you... 
transformer or sweet but low cost phono pre amp
You may want to build your own box around a pair of SUT's: less money, more quality. I use Sowter 8055's with the oxygen-free copper option, Vishay VAR resistors, and Eichmann connectors. Sound is good enough for a high end Koetsu. 
Spindle/bearing noise measurement
Hello Graham. I use a good tonearm and disposable cartridge, with the stylus resting on the housing. 
Martin Logan panel renewal
Hello Ptss.I am the proud owner of 2 ML Prodigy's. They are in storage. I now use Quad 2905's, which, to my ears, are far superior.My problem is the discontinuity between the (fast) electrostatic panel, and the (slow) cone speaker. I should also m...