prof
Responses from prof
| Thiel Owners I had no problem getting the Thiel CS6 to sound stupendous in a room only 13’ X 15’ (though with a wide opening to the hall) and CJ premier 12 tube monoblocks. | |
| I love my Hales T5’s but what about Magico A3 or Vandersteen? looks like @mitchb has gone silent. | |
| I love my Hales T5’s but what about Magico A3 or Vandersteen? I owned the Hales T5s for quite a while. They are a fabulous speaker and IMO competitive with plenty of new speakers. In fact I find them better than many new speaker in terms of timbrel beauty and accuracy.Few speakers sound so "right" across t... | |
| What's your dream speaker? 1. DeVore O Reference (simply extrapolating from what I’ve heard from the O/96)2. MBL 101E3. Joseph Audio Pearl graphene4. Perhaps some flavour of horn speaker. I find myself ever more persuing a sense of density and aliveness, which horns are kno... | |
| Why is science just a starting point and not an end point? 'Blind Tests To Determine: Do Either Red Or White Boxed Wines Go Best With Chef Boyardee Pizza?'Ok, I've given up on Rodman. Looks like that's the best we'll get from him. | |
| Why is science just a starting point and not an end point? Well, I asked for a clear example from rodman99999 about some tweak he "hears" making a difference at home, and we get yet more scattershot rambling and links...as if someone else needs to do the job to piece it all together.Again, this is a threa... | |
| Why is science just a starting point and not an end point? Is the unfathomable irony, of one that IMAGINES themselves a fictional intelligence operative, posting a quote from ANOTHER fictional character, lost on anyone? Then: there's, "prof" (snort of derisio... | |
| Why is science just a starting point and not an end point? It seems rodman99999 can’t or won’t answer direct questions clearly for some reason.So this is for others...As I’ve written before, it’s typical for believers in dubious claims, under pressure from skepticism, to fall back on classic responses as ... | |
| Why is science just a starting point and not an end point? djones51,Agreed.The amount of pseudoscientific thinking in this hobby is tiresome, isn't it? | |
| Why is science just a starting point and not an end point? Prof-FWIW, I never misunderstand what you write. In this case I was attempting to open your mind a little & improve the performance of your audio system at the same time. Thank you, but I prefer to allocate my money toward things that actually... | |
| Why is science just a starting point and not an end point? boxer12You misunderstand.This thread is about how science, and the scientific method, bares upon audio claims.You are simply repeating a request to engage in non-scientific anecdotal method, with zero control for imagination and bias.If you can pa... | |
| Why is science just a starting point and not an end point? mahgisterBy god you seem to be gullible.Of course I referenced a specific theory of earthing: "improving their health" by "grounding themselves magnetically to the earth" with their bare feet." I’ve already seen the "theory" taken apart by knowled... | |
| Why is science just a starting point and not an end point? boxer12Note the theme of this thread.I can find similar testimonies for people "improving their health" by "grounding themselves magnetically to the earth" with their bare feet.And for the healing power of magnetic bracelets. And for faith healers... | |
| Why is science just a starting point and not an end point? mahgister, FYI: I have come to ignore your replies, based on past experience, and seeing you produce more of the same. Don’t let that stop you though ;-) | |
| Why is science just a starting point and not an end point? rodman,You are all over the place.First, I’d written: Ask yourself: When science has been corrected: how was it corrected?That’s right, by more science. It’s a self-correcting method.Do you agree or not?If so, the old "science has been wrong" bit ... |