nandric
Responses from nandric
| Not as much activity on analog here Searching for whatever in our hobby imply investment.As should be known there is a shortage of investment everywhere at present. | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Hi Fleib, The statement made is: 'I put forth that thisnow pathetic thread be put to rest, and let you 2 take topersonal email'. You call this 'comment' and even 'contribution' without being 'contribution'. I callthis qualification without a singl... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Amen!'a club of sorts' is like a church community but because ofall those damn atheist we need to use a 'sorts' of othername. | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Lew, First thing first. I am sorry I forget to nameSartre. This Freud has obviously some 'points' right.I forget not because of you but myself. I hate Hegelians.Now about those 'northern' man. The most are blond and forsome unknown reasons ve... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? The eloquence of Lew is a mixed blessing. From Dostojevski,Kant, Newton, Einstein via slate plinths, innumerable TT's/tonerms then elecrotstatics and tubes we now reached thedomain of the (old) sport cars with special attention forthe Alfa Romeo's... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Do we miss Raul and if so why? My guess is that we miss him because no other is willing to spend so much money in searh for the interesting new MM carts. We were spolied with the easy access to the carts of the month each, uh, month.Since Raul lef... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Storyboy, You should check the meaning of the word 'pathetic' first and if this does not help follow my implicite advise in connection with Lew. When he writes about Newton I simply pass over his post. Despite the fact that I very much like the gu... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Lew, We all want the so called NOS carts. The reason is of course the stylus . But we can only hope that the suspension is also ok. Those are mostly more as 30 yearsold carts. AKG's last (2?) series are notorious because of their wrong 'rubbe... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Lew, This is your x time complaining about your Grace Ruby re-tip asking others for a possible explanation. This imply that you made no effort to explain the cause yourself. You also missed my attempt to provide some answers. I think that Rau... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Hi Fleib, What an coincidence. I bought the cheap onesome time ago and this Jico SAS replacement I got frommy comrade Don yesterday. I am sorry but I need to use thisexpression again. The SAS one has tension wire ,of which Iam so fond, inside. Don... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Fleib, I desagree with you about importance of this tension wire and the joint pipe. Who would expect such attitude from me (grin)?My arguments are: if the styli with tension wire sounds better than those without this should be interesting fo... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Fleib, Dertonarm is a good friend of my whom I also admire. I don't believe that my report about his products can be objective. But to satisfy your or possible otherscuriosity I need to first mention that Archon is the first item I ever bough... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Hi Fleib, You should check your set-theoretic assumption.There are no numerical bondaries for the quantor 'all'.There are sets with just one member about which one canquantify. Then you pretend that I have some issue withJ. Carr and not with you. ... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Hi Fleib, You quoted J.Carr sentence which was: 'In every phono cartridge that I have seen'..., etc. I assume that your quote was meant as an contra argument against myassumption in this regard. Well I can assure you that the expression 'in every ... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Hi Fleib, I am really sorry but I need to use some logical arguments again. The quantor 'all' is a trucky one.'For all x Fx&Gx ' means that all x of a given set satisfy the conditions Fx and Gx. For F and G one can chose whatever property one ... |