kr4
Responses from kr4
Grilles or No Grilles Airegin: I fully agree and that is the point I was trying to make in my first post.Kal | |
Two-channel is inferior to multi-channel, no? Listening is never monaural unless you put a finger in one ear. You always listen with both ears even to a single sound source. What you might be talking about is monophonic (meaning one source) + ambiance but, even then, that applies to a tiny pr... | |
Beatles USB via Squeezebox Touch Using any drive directly into the SBT's USB input means that you are forced to use the tiny server software in the SBT rather than the one on the host computer. Interaction is sluggish and 24/192, fwiw, is not possible.Kal | |
At what distance are balanced XLR cables needed? Mariv26: Anything over 3 meters, but I would still keep the interconnects as short as possibleI don't think you can make such a general recommendation. It really depends on the EMI environment. OTOH, if you believe that there are no potential disa... | |
subwoofers w/room correction The Behringer has potential but (1) it is not built in as requested by the OP and (2) it also requires a competent external measurement system (e.g., REW) to calculate the necessary filters.Kal | |
At what distance are balanced XLR cables needed? There are no guarantees. I have heard of people resorting to balanced cables for much shorter lengths because their situations involve lots of EMI. (Do you live near a radio/TV transmitter?) Recording/mastering studios have miles of cables all inf... | |
subwoofers w/room correction Marty is spot-on. The auto setup on the Velodynes is grossly inferior to a manual setup but both are limited to a single microphone position and only account for frequency response correction.The JL is a pretty simply single frequency parametric E... | |
At what distance are balanced XLR cables needed? I run 10meter interconnects, balanced and unbalanced, in Manhattan and have no noise problems with either. FWIW.Kal | |
At what distance are balanced XLR cables needed? No answer is possible without knowing (1) the output current abilities of your preamp and (2) how much EMI noise there is.Kal | |
Why is 2 Channel better than multi-channel? Eldartford wrote: The effect is to put the musicians in your room as opposed to the usual approach of transporting you to some recording venue. Bryoncunningham wrote: I think you are right about this. So, whether you find this approach to multich... | |
Two-channel is inferior to multi-channel, no? Avgoround wrote: If you're into sound coming from all around you, and don't mind the overall refinement of the recording likely deteriorated a bit, I don't think you have much to stand on in this argument. You offer that same specious argument abo... | |
Why is 2 Channel better than multi-channel? Bryon, I agree. There are, also, terrible stereo recordings. Any technology can be misused or used tastelessly.Kal | |
Why is 2 Channel better than multi-channel? Niacin, in a real world live performance, sound does come from all around you. That is what accounts for the differences in the sound of a performance in a small club, a concert hall, a gymnasium and an outdoor stadium. It is, also, those differen... | |
Why is 2 Channel better than multi-channel? Niacin wrote: Having music coming at me from all angles is as unnatural an experience as I can imagine.I do not generally care for such either but that statement indicates a fundamental misunderstanding of the goals and advantages of multichannel ... | |
Why is 2 Channel better than multi-channel? Cine 100, I was distinguishing between multichannel for music and multichannel for home theater. Without doubt, MCH HT is the volume mover for dealers these days and those that still sell a bit of audio tend to sell stereo.What is the issue for me... |