Anti skating SME V

HI, you're right. I saw the 3rd pic and that kinda looks like a 20/12 but the platter is off...making it appear wider...thanks

This sounds EXACTLY like some "problems" I've been having with an assortment of tables, arms and cartridges which have passed in and out of my system over the past 2 years. To be more precise, I've had Avid Volvere and Oracle Delphi V and VI tables, 2 SME Vs, one Graham Phantom, and multiple cartridges including Benz Ruby, Zyx UNIverse, Dynavector XV-1s and Ortofon MC A90. In every case I have had EXACTLY the same issues you are describing - with the added caveat that some of the combos gave me tracking issues in the right channel. With my current set-up (Delphi VI, Phantom and A90) I seem to be getting the best overall tracking performance but only with more than max antiskating and the DIN connector rotated all the way counterclockwise. All in all, skipping in the lead-in groove was worst with the XV-1s (the issue you're having) and tracking was worst with the UNIverse - the issue always appearing to be related to excessive skating force causing skipping ahead or mistracking.

Anyways, I've worked with and examined this issue in ridiculous amounts of detail and basically have come to a conclusion similar to Doug. Now I'm just enjoying the music!

Normally I rather laugh at people who re-awaken zombie threads, but this was the first hit on a search for "SME V IV anti-skate"! I searched because I have been finding it awkward to set the anti-skate of late, so to be a bit more scientific about it I used a smooth grooveless record. I know, anti-skate counteracts skating force, and a grooveless record is not going to show the full stylus-groove interaction. For the sake of argument, let us agree it gets you in the ballpark (even the nine different ways of setting anti-skate tested by the maker of the Parks Puffin in a YT video showed the grooveless record as getting very close to all the other methods).

Now the grooveless record showed two SME IVs and an SME V still let the stylus wander slowly towards the centre even with the anti-skate set to the maximum of 3. The fourth arm, an SME M10 (call it a 309 with a cheaper sliding mount), can hold its position mid-disk with the anti-skate set to 2.5. This makes me think the first three arms have their anti-skate spring weakened by age, and perhaps should make a visit to West Sussex to have the spring replaced. But spending £1k per arm for a 10¢ spring seems extravagant. I shall ask my contact at SME if such a spring can be bought and fitted at home.

Question for the smart people here: I am right, am I not, in assuming the anti-skate on these arms is spring-loaded and not magnetic?

Got a reply from SME:

Dear Chris,

Thank you for your email to Elaine.

The anti skate spring can only be fitted / calibrated here at the factory due to unique tooling and measurement equipment used.

If you would like to send the arms for checking we would be happy to help.

Whilst writing we should mention that blank test discs are not recommended or suggested by SME due to inconsistent results leading to poor set up.
Best regards,
Brian

Decided to do it properly and ordered a Wally Skater....

I'd love to see how they calibrate a new spring.

Per ordering the Wally Skater, do what properly?  Set antiskate? With that response from SME, I think it adds weight to the idea not to use a blank LP to set AS.  And yet, the posts on doing it that way will keep on coming.