Analog vs. digital


I’ve found that on my system the digital side is more finely etched than the analog side. Both sound great in their own way, but records just don’t sound so finely defined.
What is your experience?

128x128rvpiano

I have six times more money on the analog side and on my system the analog is more musical with more presence. DSD stored locally is wonderful, but the same material on a good pressing is better..but that assumes that I have the funds to buy the album, it is available and is a good pressing. 

Everything comes down to$$,  the sweet spot in digital $4-6 k 

turntables  similar ,  T get a lot better maybe 3-4x the price in my experiences 

in the many setups I have heard.

My experience is that once you cross a certain threshold, analog sounds better.

 

My digital is Emm, my analog is VPI.  I haven’t had much need to upgrade my digital.  But my analog is probably twice as expensive as my digital.  Both sound great but the analog has a more realistic sound.  It’s more “defined” as well.

 

I tried a regular entry level turntable in my exact system, sounded dull and vague and missing bass notes by comparison.  I don’t believe analog is baseline better than digital.

 

it’s easier to get your digital to sound great rather than analog.  IMO.

The more money you invest (the more research you do) the better system you get. It's not really important if it's analog or digital.......

At 16 bits, the 'etching' you hear is distortion caused by the limitations of 16-bit digital. At 24-bits, it is actual detail that even the best analog has a hard time duplicating. I recently picked up a pristine copy of Jesse Winchester's 'Let The Rough Side Drag'. It is everything that analog promises, sweet, spacious and invting. My CD copy, by comparison is hard and flat, not really enjoyable sonically. For both, the performances and the songs are amazing. I would love to hear a 24-bit remaster from the original master tapes, but I'm not holding my breath. And that's the problem. For much of the catalog from the mid-60s to mid-80s, 24-bit remasters simply aren't available for all the usual reasons - financial, logistical, and technical. So, we're left with only the analog pressings or first generation digital, most of which simply aren't very well done. Newer originals, mostly 24-bit digital, suffer far less and when down-converted to 16-bit CD and can sound quite detailed, but without a proper analog master for comparison, who's to say which might be better. Kind of hard to find in any event.