Are Ohm Walsh's a step up from Martin Login Electro Motion ESL's


I currently have a hapr of Martin Login Electro Motion ESL's and I will never get rid of them, but in my current house only one person can trully be in the sweet spot for the speakers, and it does get a little annoying how fast you can get off axis.  I really want to find something beautilf sounding in a small room that just feels like you are there.  The one speaker that keeps coming up that can do this are Ohm Walshes.  I have been looking at the Ohm Walsh 2's and doing an upgrade (speakers on my terrms) or looking at the tall 2000s.   I really want to find a speaker that is my last speaker for a long time. 

I am driving my speakers with Odessy Kismet Mono block's and a Schiit Freya+ with RCA JAN 5692's in the gain side and PSVANE COSSOR 6SN7 in the buffer side.  

Have anyone compared Ohm's to Martin Logan's.  Anything else I should be looking at.  My budget is $4000+ but I also am a guy that likes rebuilds of things.  I primarily listen to Rock and Jazz

128x128justinrphillips

Auralec Subdude just make sure big enough for those MLs. Available off Amazon not expensive and should be returnable. I’m thinking it would help clean up bass that can also Obscure midrange detail if needed. Hardwood floor coverings especially on suspended plywood floor structure common with upper levels of many homes can be rough acoustically. Carpet on floor in front of speakers can also help if needed.

 

check my system pics that show my ohm 100s with 8" drivers on Auralec Subdude pads in family room on second level of my house  

 

Corner placement boosts bass. With Ohm Walsh probably a small model maybe even microwalsh may be best. You could add a sub at location of your choice if even needed. Run it by the folks there they have a good rep as straight shooters and won’t try to sell you something you don’t need.

Post removed 

A true omni is not an ideal recommendation for that room if the positioning is that close to wall, and because of the corner. The man would have to treat the corner, which could screw up the M/T. It might be a different story if the room could be rearranged and the speakers moved out further. YMMV

How about for a start you not toe in the ML speakers. You’re complaining about how narrow the sweet spot is, but you have them toed in. So, change it and put them parallel to the head wall. Obviously this will open up the center image, but you’ll have perhaps enough size for two to listen. You’re not going to get much out into the room at all with those speakers. You would need a different genre.

I agree with douglas schroeder.

The OP has limited wiggle room, and to really appreciate most speakers, they need room to breath. 4-6 feet out. The OP presumably did the ML "light shining" position regarding the toe in?

I have a pair of Theos(step up from the OP’s) that sound quite good for their small size-Not a Soundlab, Maggie or big ML, but very convincing.

6 feet out from the front wall, 3.5 from the side. Combination of damping/diffusion to taste.

 

Hey Doug you know the Ohm Walsh are not true Omni right? If they were definitely not in corners. But they are designed to go closer to walls than many. Still I have never landed on a corner placement with my Ohms by choice . Can work but may not be optimal placement for them . In general Ohm Walsh are easy to place for good results but there is always still such a thing as optimal placement if possible in one’s particular case.

Big difference between ohm and ML dispersion being just one. Both are good speakers subject to preference and what works best in each case. So I would be cautious about using the term "a step up". Either might do very well if set up properly. The ohms clearly solve the sweet spot problem though versus ml. Trying to play with toe in or no toe in is a good idea always.