Tekton Double Impacts


Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli
Totally agree with Kenny's opinion/position on what happens as you go up in power/watts on the DI's, and the Ulf's, slight changes in bass presentation, nothing radical regarding over "aliveness" dynamics and clear differences in tonality/color depending if you are using tubes or solid state amps.  Since both speakers are easy to drive conduits, I much prefer tubes in general and SET amps specifically because of what they have to offer in timbres/tonality, meaty 3D imaging, and spatial dimensions.

To be quite frank/honest, with no disrespect to anyone, I find that many so-called audiophiles and reviewers need to play their systems at very high volume levels because over the years they have really screwed up their ability to hear high frequencies at realistic volume levels because of the many years of setting in front of their system at unsafe/harmful dB levels.  Ever time I have gone to shows my first request virtually in ever room is could you please turn down the volume.  Because I'm spoiled reviewer, instead of copping an attitude they often oblige.  When I'm invited to other listener's home to hear the music through their system I also almost always am requesting to turn down the volume.

In all systems because of many factors their is going to be a "sweet spot" were all the dynamics are present, along with realistic sound-staging/layering, and finally the size of the individual players.  My major way of dialing in that sweet spot is the size of months of singers, and if a trumpet becomes four feet long its time to reduce the volume.  As a system reaches reference level performance the "sweet spot" becomes more precise with each recording and sometimes has to be reset on different selections on the same recording because the sound engineer did some changes from cut to cut.  So many times I have sat in front of systems that are playing at possible damaging dB levels with prefect clarity and dynamics but the snare drum sounds like it is the size of a bath tube!  Please turn it down is my quick request to the owner of the system.
The good news for all of us is the DI's most definitely give us a speaker that is a true "Conduit" and will respond to any changes made upstream of them but on the other hand we have a speaker that's fairly forgiving and does exceptionally well with all kinds of gear.

In my 36 yrs in this hobby,I haven't ever owned or heard a speaker quite like this one and I smile in amazement every day that I listen too them.

Simply no right way or wrong way in gear choices and what pleases the "Ears" of each individual audiophile/musiclover.

Kenny.
@kdude66- Totally agree the DI is a fantastic tool for an audiophile to learn what they like. I do agree with sprocket75 that putting some power behind the DI's does add some presence and "realism" and I listen at an average volume in the mid to upper 70db range with peaks in the mid 80's.
   This big SS vs SET amps brings up an important personal distinction and there aren't too many speakers out there that can sound good with  both big SS and SET. For many years I wondered what was wrong with me because I didn't feel so passionately about SET amps that people gushed over and I tried (845,211,300B, 2A3). I finally read a Nelson Pass article about distortion and found out that it's about an even split between people that prefer 3rd order harmonic distortion to 2nd order....Clearly my ears prefer the 3rd harmonic and that truly helped me make decisions about speaker choices and amplification. It was liberating to know that there wasn't something wrong with me for not loving SET.
   As far as the DI's go, they are the perfect way to find out what camp you fall in (2nd order, 3rd order, mixture of both). If you don't know which camp you fall in, pick a representative example of both topologies at the same time (if economically feasible) and find out what your ears prefer.
  
Everything about this hobby is subjective when it comes to sound quality. But you have to be very careful about generalizations regardings amps and especially specific tubes.
All I can tell you guys is that my solid state 30 watt per channel All Class A Pioneer M-22 sounds noticeably better than my solid state 200 watts per channel Class AB Schiit Audio Vidar amp.

The Vidar bass is outstanding for a $699 amp. But, the bass is better with the M-22. I listen to a lot of classical music and my max volumes do see an occasional 100dB because of the dynamic range. I have never had the M-22 have a problem with headroom. I wish it had a meters so I could tell how much power is being used. I don't see how extra power would change the sound if you never use it....