I've found EJ to be exceptionally helpful and direct. He won't steer you wrong.
Wyred 4 Sound W4S DAC-2 DSD
Hi there,
I am running a music server off of a headless PC. (No monitor.)
It is running Daphile, a Linux-based single purpose music server based on Logitech Media Server.
My Wyred4Sound DAC-2 DSD is connected to one of the PC USB ports via USB cable. Other than the power cable, there is nothing else plugged into the PC. No other USB devices, cables, etc.
My question is how does the USB input of the DSD-2 DSD compare to the coax input?
I have heard that previous W4S DACs (non DSD) may have benefited from the Audiophilleo or other similar USB to S/PDIF devices. However, the USB on the DAC-2 is upgraded, has galvanic isolation, supports integer / direct modes, requires no drivers on Mac / Linux, etc.
Would I benefit from getting an Audiophilleo, connecting that to the USB of the PC, and connecting to the DAC via coax? Obviously, I would lose DSD capabilities this way.
Is the USB on the W4S DAC-2 DSD elevated to the point that a USB to S/PDIF convertor would not provide improved sound?
Thanks,
Mark
I am running a music server off of a headless PC. (No monitor.)
It is running Daphile, a Linux-based single purpose music server based on Logitech Media Server.
My Wyred4Sound DAC-2 DSD is connected to one of the PC USB ports via USB cable. Other than the power cable, there is nothing else plugged into the PC. No other USB devices, cables, etc.
My question is how does the USB input of the DSD-2 DSD compare to the coax input?
I have heard that previous W4S DACs (non DSD) may have benefited from the Audiophilleo or other similar USB to S/PDIF devices. However, the USB on the DAC-2 is upgraded, has galvanic isolation, supports integer / direct modes, requires no drivers on Mac / Linux, etc.
Would I benefit from getting an Audiophilleo, connecting that to the USB of the PC, and connecting to the DAC via coax? Obviously, I would lose DSD capabilities this way.
Is the USB on the W4S DAC-2 DSD elevated to the point that a USB to S/PDIF convertor would not provide improved sound?
Thanks,
Mark
14 responses Add your response
| Post removed |
Peter - this is the cable http://www.ebay.com/itm/Power-supply-and-USB-cable-separate-audio-signal-cable-/251589388236?ssPageName=ADME:X:AAQ:US: I also use a 1 amp power adapter like this one... >http://www.ebay.ca/itm/ENERCELL-AC-to-USB-Power-Adapter-5VDC-1000mA-2730414-/291291051350?pt=Travel_Adapters_Converters&hash=item43d24cb556 I tested it against a rechargeable USB battery and could hear no difference, which is really good for a switched power supply Regards |
| Post removed |
One thing you might want to look into is whether the W4S uses power from the computers USB port - many DACS take this approach. I found a dual USB cable where one cable handles just data and a second just power - they are joined at the DACs usb plug. I now power my DAC's USB board from an external power adapter. The improvement was quite noticeable. The cable itself is very good quality and improved on my DH-Labs USB cable - even with both cables plugged into my iMac. Other USB power solutions include the AQvox power supply which injects cleaner power into an adapter that fits between the USB cable and the DAC socket. Personally, on my Bifrost I was unable to tell the difference between USB, SPDIF and Optical inputs. But I think the dual cable and seperate power supply upped the anti in favour of USB implementation. Regards |
| Post removed |
| Post removed |